Rove Says “Dem Apocalypse” Tuesday. Not Good Enough

Janus, the Roman god; otherwise known as the Neo-con/Democrat hybrid

By: Jay

Karl Rove writes in the Wall Street Journal that Tuesday will see an “apocalypse” of the Democratic Party. While that may be the case with regard to the standard party politics, it’s not good enough for the country. If we simply shove in a gaggle of neo-cons, all we will get is more of the same, minus slightly different rhetoric. If Gingrich runs for president in 2012, it will be more of the same, since Gingrich supports carbon taxes. And insert there as well Palin, Romney or Petraeus. Carbon tax is, of course, one of the key pillars of the present globalist-minded Washington establishment, and it has been totally discredited. And by establishment, I mean the mainline left and “right.” Gingrich is not a conservative, and Palin isn’t good enough. Many of the candidates presently running aren’t really conservative, either, but many are. Rand Paul represents the best among the candidates, as well as Sharron Angle, and it’s here that we can begin to see a step in the right direction.

Proof that they are legitimate is in the pudding – who does the mainline media go after relentlessly? Paul and Angle. While we are in the midst of depression, more proposed banker bailouts, more proposed government takeovers and nanny state control, do we really think a pile of neo-connery will save us? We shouldn’t. Most of the neo-con establishment backtracks and waffles as often as the Democrats they have stage play battles with. 

So what is the future trend? Like it or not, the future trend is the popularity of Ron Paul.  At CPAC this year, Paul annihilated Romney. Romney had, the prior year, edged out Paul, and a year later, Paul blows away Romney. If Republican Partiers want to survive, they should understand that it won’t work to shuffle in the same old hacks. In fact, if we get a new crop of neo-cons, it will signal a future apocalypse of the Republican Party. Perhaps this is a good thing. Like it or not, the trend is Ron Paul. 

The political zeitgeist is one of awakening, and the so-called conservatives are taking baby steps towards the right positions, but we must beware of falling into tribalism and drifting off to sleep, assuming our football team has beat the other team. That’s not good enough. A crop of neo-cons isn’t good enough. People are tired of the same old hacks–it’s like political Groundhog Day.  More quantitative easing, more inflation, more regulations, more big brother, and more bailouts only signal further destruction of the economy, and what is crucial to understand is that this destruction is by design, not by “inefficiency” and not by “stupidity.” This is the line the mainstream outlets continually sell, but it’s just not the case. Former chief economist of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, who leaked the facts in 2000 that this monetary apocalypse plan was by design, and it’s the same globalist banker crew that was among that ilk. This is what the neo-cons won’t talk about, and even Gary North at LewRockwell seems to be unaware of the fact that it was known to be an implosion by design.  Until we identify the real problem, solutions cannot be given. Thus, the future is not more neo-cons, but real conservatives.  Another influx of neo-cons will only wake people up further.

Global Banking Elite Controls World Economy

(An old article from my old site – the players mentioned here are in the news now)

A Simple Glance at the Geo-Economic Structure

By: Jay

Last Friday I called in to the Alex Jones Show and spoke with Alex and Bob Chapman about the Group of 30.  The discussion was essentially as follows:  two semesters ago, the head of the economic department at my university gave a lecture on the EU economy and the Euro.  In fact, after a few prodding questions from myself, she related that the EU set-up was similar to our privately owned Federal Reserve system in the US.  I asked her why a system of privately owned banks is in charge of the issuance of currency, and, as most status quo partisans echo, she stated that it was for “economic stability.” 

This is now laughable.  Why is that after 1913 with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act the Great Depression soon ensued?  Where was the economic stability promised in this privatization of banking and currency.  Following the depression, bankers and their ilk seized tons of assets: this is how Joseph Kennedy, Sr. (JFK’s father) made the family wealthy.  After the depression, the engineered chaos was only “solved” by massive socialization through FDR’s “New Deal.”  We are witnessing something similar now, though rather than being primarily a federal takeover, it’s a banker takeover (but bankers have long owned the government anyway–think Col. House).  And its likely that if things continue to spiral out of control, Obama will, I’m sure, offer us a ‘New Deal: Part 2.”  Read more of this post

Colleges and Universities Do Not Want the Best and Brightest

By: Jay

I recently graduated, and my rocky, extended college career has given me many insights into the nature of the system, or more properly what might be called the academic control grid. I’ve seen quite a bit in my ten years at four different colleges, though those stats might lead you to believe I’m a closet failure. Not so: I only seemed to be a failure, that I might avail myself of more time to analyze the system and expose it. Okay, not really. But I have learned some things about the control grid that is the education/university system.

Is it all bad? No, not the 10% that isn’t the norm. I personally learned a lot of good philosophy enjoying some engaging philosophy, literature, and history classes. But what really rubs me raw is (forgive me for sounding like a troubled teen) how fake the entire structure is. It reminds of an “Amos and Andy” episode I saw once as a kid, where the duo bought a house from a Hollywood set that appeared very large and quite exquisite, but was actually a huge, one-dimensional set piece. “Sho is a thin house,” said Andy after walking through the door. The University system is precisely that. In reality, it is a massive house built upon the four balsa wood pillars of statism, Darwinism, communistic/socialistic “equality” and pure relativism. Behind these is the “secret” pillar of Freemasonry and the Rockefeller-Banker controlled foundations and a subtly constructed plan (borrowed from the Prussians), and created for the purpose of dumbing down students into complete Pavlovian controlled responses.

The professors are far too often 1960’s leftover-lefties, with about as much concern for truth as the Fox News they profess to hate so much. Unfortunately, one does not go to the university to learn truth: one attends the local university to learn to work the system. That is, the total control grid that elite cartels have been putting in place for the last hundred years or so. The absurdities of academic life are quite manifest: under the guise of the freedom of inquiry, the system mysteriously forbids or mocks any questioning of Darwinism or Global Warming, for example. Believe me, I know from experience. Beyond this, espousal of any kind of absolutist ethic is also swiftly persecuted in inquisitorial fashion. It takes courage for a Christian to say he opposes abortion in a modern university, and will certainly suffer ridicule and sometimes even receive bad grades, simply for taking an un-popular, biblical position. This is not always the case, but can and does occur. Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers