Knowledge Without Wisdom: Phaethon and Technocracy

Gustave Moreau's Phaethon.

Gustave Moreau’s Phaethon.

By: Jay

In our emergent technocracy we are submerged in a sea of knowledge.  Modern wonders reach their apex in the readily-available stores of knowledge at anyone’s fingertips.  Given this seemingly magical commodity was heretofore unknown to vast swaths of now dead humanity, one would think man would jump at the opportunity to educate himself on any and every topic.  Yet the reality is quite the contrary, as such a notion of aspiring, latent human potential had its origin in the universalized doctrine of “human reason” bequeathed to us from the Enlightenment.   The vast online Alexandrian databases are only perused by a few, with the majority of humanity preferring to opt for a wasted life of the meaningless and mundane.  In a strange twist that must baffle the modern progressive, humanity has devolved with the advent of their imagined tech utopia, not risen to the heights of transcendence.  The question arises – what is the purpose of never ending streams of knowledge, without wisdom?

Before considering that question, we have to ask how we arrived at this point.  For several hundred years, Western man in particular has been firmly convinced of the dogma that humans are blank slates awaiting only the right imprinting, the perfected external educational stimulant, and when the hallowed secular social order finally gets it just right, man would achieve his Promethean triumph.  When the coming technocracy appears, universal education and global democratic republics full of enlightened, informed citizenry will lead the way into the great ascent to godhood.   With a rising erection, the Enlightenment evangelists even hoped a fully global government would be conjured up, like some benevolent republican idealistic version of the Incarnation out of the Kantian noumena.  Instead, it becomes more apparent each day that these ideologues were either duped or consciously evil.   The presuppositions of existing modernity and its structures of power are still operating as if the Enlightenment “truths” are axiomatic givens – enshrined discoveries of the heroes of science that are no longer in question, as the verdict of reason and history are fully and ever vindicated.  The hard truth is that the Enlightenment ideologues were not only fundamentally wrong, but they were funded by the banking cartel for the purpose of social disorder and reorganization.  The dark lords of cash and subversive secret societies atop the idiot demagogues and salesmen were quite cognizant of the stupidity of such notions of Enlightenment tabula rasa anthropology, nevertheless, the endless stream of Dantons won out and even still never go away.  All the while, the money power laughs a hearty satanic cackle as the centuries pass by.

And so here we a couple hundred years after 1789 and 1776 and what do we see?  We see the intelligenstia operating as if physics and empiricism are actually explanatory “grand narratives.”  In total hypocrisy, labeling religion a fictitious “grand narrative” that only existed because it had explanatory power and satiated human fears, these intellectually dishonest liars erected their own alternative narrative that daily assaults me, and which I gleefully dissect on a daily basis: The new Gospel of human ascent through “science.”  One thinks here of August Comte’s patterned view of history where man passes from gradual stages of enlightenment, from primitive superstition and paganism, to rational monotheism, to philosophy and metaphysics, to physics and “social science.”  Although nothing could be further from the truth as regards the actual working of science and the actual structures of human social order and history, this mythology is still modernity’s Heilsgeschichte. 

For Jurgen Habermas, in his Theory and Practice,  the Frankfurt School becomes the praxis for the dark side strategy, whose own work is a manifestation of the angst of grappling with the course of the never ending “revolution,” from 1776/1789 onwards, looking into the future for the social engineers to fix man through his needed destruction.  I cite Habermas because he is a major Marxist Frankfurt School thinker who links the destruction of the old world to the French and American revolutionaries.  Habermas and the rest of his ilk like Horkheimer and Adorno, who worked with Western oligarchs and British establishment to destroy Western social order, export their weaponized disintegration to the rest of the globe.  They are significant for demonstrating that evil is not merely an organic, chaotic force that just occurs.  On the contrary, evil is very much concentrated, organzied and cunning in its tactics.  The key point here is that this technocratic rewriting is a strategic plan for total destruction that had to first be preceded by centuries of revolution and disintegration, prior to what Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley called “the final revolution,” intending by this the great revolution against man himself.  It is organized, structured, full spectrum subversion, inversion and dominance.

Continue reading

Interview 2 w/Mark Hackard: Geopolitics and The Faustian Bargain

Check out Mark's work at SouloftheEast.org

Check out Mark’s work at SouloftheEast.org

In this latest installment of JaysAnalysis interviews, Russia Specialist Mark Hackard returns for part deux where we discuss Ukraine, the downed Malaysian Plane fiasco, false flags, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Eurasia, ideologies and traditionalism, theology, metaphysics and redemptive history, satanic inversion and its relation to alchemical processing and materialism, controlled chaos and destabilization, and a host of other issues related to deep politics and covert agendas.

 

To Download the mp3

Right click, “Save As”

BBC Sherlock: Malaysian Airlines False Flag Scripting

Season 2, Episode 1, "A Scandal in Belgravia," in 2012: Mycroft tells Sherlock Flight 007 was a false flag with already dead bodies.

Season 2, Episode 1, “A Scandal in Belgravia,” in 2012: Mycroft tells Sherlock Flight 007 was a false flag with already dead bodies.

Like Many 9/11 Examples, the Scripting of the Malaysian Plane Fiasco Matches the Plot of BBC’s Sherlock

By: Jay

Our latest media theatrical blitz is the Hollywood-esque sequel to last month’s suspicious and likely scripted airplane disaster, the mystical Malaysian Plane fiasco.  News junkies and analysts will recall the recent “loss” of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 which sparked a media furor of high ratings, speculation, pundit nonsense and even the enlistment of Courtney Love’s noteworthy, famed sleuthing abilities.  In a rare anomaly, Love was  in this case, unable to solve the so-called disaster.  Followers of JaysAnalysis or my Twitter or Facebook feed know that I deemed this event unworthy of any attention, and that I think it was likely staged, with a high probability of there being no plane at all.  That may seem extreme to some newer readers, but longtime readers will recall the numerous instances of known, staged and faked newscasts cataloged here when RawStory attacked me.

However, with the new Malaysian Plane Flight MH17, we have what appears to be something more significant – an emerging false flag event run by western intelligence and NATO to frame Russia for the purpose of further US/EU/NATO operations in staving off Russia.  In this article, I want to present that false flag thesis and other speculations based on the evidence that has emerged so far.  I will investigate the known facts to date, based on reliable sources with a good track record, the motives for the so-called attack, and the more esoteric and speculative connections that may also be relevant to seeing the “calling card” of who might have been behind the event.

The first and most obvious suspicion is that this is Malaysian Airlines, part deux.  I am not saying anything ridiculous like they are the same planes, but rather that two Malaysian Airlines flights become “diverted” to become center stage media foci within a month as mere coincidence stretches credulity.  One recalls immediately the numerous TWA flights of the last several decades that mysteriously were lost, hijacked and shot down, all of which served specific political motives advantageous to the Western establishment.  A second related question involves Malaysian Airlines itself – who owns this airline, and what intelligence agencies might be able to utilize it for such covert operations?  Hardly anyone in the media is asking this question, nor was it asked the last go around.

Continue reading

JaysAnalysis Featured on The Sunday Wire

SUNDAY-WIRE-web-small-150x1501Journalist and talk radio host Patrick Henningsen of 21stCenturyWire interviewed me on his Sunday Wire show.  We cover a broad range of topics, centering around film analysis, esoterica, philosophy and twilight language.  I come on about thirty minutes in. Note – I said William Hurt and meant John Hurt.

The link is here.

The Prestige (2006) – A Film About Revelation of the Method

Film Poster. Image: Impawards.

Film Poster. Image: Impawards.

 

By: Jay

The Pledge

For most viewers, The Prestige was a film about rival stage magicians in the Victorian Era, alternately seeking to top one another in the dank climate of emerging industrial revolution and technological wonder.  Lord Caldlow/Angiers (Hugh Jackman) is the secret nobleman who has a flair for the art of illusion, while Robert Borden and his twin (Christian Bale) are the working class stage hands who have devoted their lives to their art.  In the midst of this rivalry, the curious figure of Nikola Tesla enters (played by David Bowie) to interject the element of real magic, titled in the film, “wizardry.”  Both magicians are on a quest to sabotage the other, while seeking to perfect the greatest trick of all – the transported man.

Stage rivalry and obsession is what The Prestige is about, but it is also about much more.  After several viewings (as is my normal habit), my thesis began to congeal: The Prestige is about Hollywood and film-making itself.  And not only that, it is an industry that is an art of deception and illusion.  The director and the actors are in effect illusion artists, or con men, if you will.  The successful director is able to fool the audience into accepting that what is presented on the screen is real, even if it is evidently fantastical.  The magicians’ ingenieure, Mr. Cutter (Michael Caine), explains this principle of film as illusion at the beginning, which is to be applied to the film itself.  Cutter states:

“Every great magic trick consists of three parts or acts. The first part is called “The Pledge”. The magician shows you something ordinary: a deck of cards, a bird or a man. He shows you this object. Perhaps he asks you to inspect it to see if it is indeed real, unaltered, normal. But of course… it probably isn’t. The second act is called “The Turn”. The magician takes the ordinary something and makes it do something extraordinary. Now you’re looking for the secret… but you won’t find it, because of course you’re not really looking. You don’t really want to know. You want to be fooled. But you wouldn’t clap yet. Because making something disappear isn’t enough; you have to bring it back. That’s why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part, the part we call “The Prestige”.”

Director Christopher Nolan explains in “The Making of The Prestige” this is to be applied to both directing and the film itself as theatrical illusion: “For me, The Prestige is very much about film-making.  It’s very much about what I do.  It is also intended to suggest to the audience some of those ideas about how the film itself is spooling its narrative out to the audience.  You want people to be aware of the effect the film is having as it’s unfolding before their eyes.”  The Prestige follows this same tripartite structure, as it draws you into an ordinary story of human rivalry and obsession, the “Turn,” where the audience is looking for the secret of Angier and the Borden’s trick, but not truly looking, because like film, stage magic operates under the audience’s suspension of disbelief.  The audience “wants to be fooled.”  And in the end, the transported man must come back – reemerge or resurrect, as the final climax of the show.

Keep ya bird in her cage, mate.

Keep ya bird in her cage, mate.

 

The Turn

In order to properly understand Nolan’s film, we must consider the same principle elucidated concerning David Lynch films – twilight language.  Researcher Michael Hoffman defines “twilight language” as follows in his Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare:  “The path to unlocking this gnosis was centered in “twilight language,” a once nearly universal subliminal communication system used in Egypt, Babylon, the Indian subcontinent and among the Aztecs, consisting of a combination of numbers, archetypal words and symbols, which in our time are sometimes embedded in modern advertising, and in certain modern films and music…. In Oriental Tantra, the mantra (including dharanikavacayamala, etc.) is sonically calculated to induce a particular action.  It forms part of the original sanskrit concept of sandhyabhasa(twilight language).  In Tantra, ‘Sandhyabhasa…is a language of light and darkness…in this higher type of discourse, words have another, a different meaning: this is not to be openly discussed.”  (pg. 207) Continue reading

Magickal Kingdom Ultra: Escape From Tomorrow and Sinister Disney

Escape From Tomorrow film poster with panopticon all-seeing eye.

Escape From Tomorrow film poster with panopticon all-seeing eye.

By: Jay

What is Disneyland?  Is it a classic incarnation of Amerikana, or is it, nowadays at least, something more?  Is it harmless, family friendly entertainment where the imagination is able to run free, or is there more at work inside the nation’s largest theme park/entertainment complex?  Rumors and speculation have abounded for years of  bizarre, inexplicable events associated with the parks as well as on the cruise ship lines, odd images embedded in the films, even to the Disney family being involved in “brainwashing” and “incest,” according to news reports.  While most of these topics are supposedly laid to waste through snopes.com and other debunkers, I propose there is more than meets the All-Seeing Eye at work.

A recent independent film has been released called Escape From Tommorow, in which the theme park is presented as a descent into madness, where an average family embarks on something akin to a bad acid trip, experiencing strange encounters, demonic forces, sexual enticement and self-destruction.  The film utilizes classic mythological and fairy tale motifs, concomitant with classic Disney, as well as blending all of that with Freudianism, conspiracy memes and technocracy.  Having received mixed reviews, I find it particularly relevant to the question of Disney itself, as the film is both a satire of what has become of Amerikana, as well as connecting with other recently released Disney films, such as Maleficent, another telling of the Sleeping Beauty like Escape From Tomorrow.  While it may seem strange to say, it is not outside the realm of possibility from the occult perspective that multiple films are released around the same time, utilizing similar stories and themes with the intention of having a ritual effect.  While this could be mere coincidence, there could also be more at work.

Continue reading

Creation Metaphysics and “A Single Unified Science”

Creation Icon.

Creation Icon.

By: Jay

I have written on scientism lately, and in the archives several more critiques of scientism and naïve empiricism (its presupposition) are available.  The question then arises as to how are we to replace this bad, contradictory narrative of man’s “progress” with something better.  Is there an answer elsewhere?  Can claims of religious belief and theology be rational?  Are they not merely leaps of faith, with no reason behind them?  In short, there are answers and religious claims are just as warranted as a “scientific” claim, and sometimes more so.  When we consider “warranted” beliefs, as they are often termed in philosophy, we can see alternate explanations that are far superior to the reductionist materialism of our day.

It is my thesis that there is an alternate metaphysics that is suppressed by the centralized western establishment that has allowed a covert advancement in highly complex technologies, while the ignorant public have been given a mass consumption physics and worldview that is ultimately a dead-end (materialism).  One of the chief arguments I fall back on is the fact that highly advanced technologies are based on a rigorous, formal logic that is ordered and perfectly systematic.  Since logic itself, which forms the basis and presupposition of those systems, is not, and cannot be “matter,” the central narrative explanation of reality given by modern academia for man’s origins, “Enlightenment,” and so-called scientific advance is completely wrong.

This alternate metaphysics is closer to what is found in aspects of Platonism and Eastern Orthodox theology, and this is likely what informed Tesla to be so successful with his inventions, despite his latter days of theosophy.  I do not intend to advocate all of Platonism or Pythagoreanism or later developments in Plato’s students, but rather when considering foundational philosophical presuppositional commitments and assumptions, the ideas of thinkers closer to this tradition are more correct than those of an atomistic, materialist bent.  Modern quantum thinkers generally tend to be open about “Platonic” theories of metaphysics matching up to their discoveries, while materialistic science is utterly bankrupt at providing any coherent account of reality.

One of the founding fathers of quantum physics, Werner Heisenberg, stated:

“In the philosophy of Democritus the atoms are eternal and indestructible units of matter, they can never be transformed into each other. With regard to this question modern physics takes a definite stand against the materialism of Democritus and for Plato and the Pythagoreans. The elementary particles are certainly not eternal and indestructible units of matter, they can actually be transformed into each other. As a matter of fact, if two such particles, moving through space with a very high kinetic energy, collide, then many new elementary particles may be created from the available energy and the old particles may have disappeared in the collision. Such events have been frequently observed and offer the best proof that all particles are made of the same substance: energy. But the resemblance of the modern views to those of Plato and the Pythagoreans can be carried somewhat further. The elementary particles in Plato’s Timaeus are finally not substance but mathematical forms.

Continue reading

Great Unused Alternative Band Names

Tweet Tweet Terrorist! or Pony Force?  YOU DECIDE!

Tweet Tweet Terrorist! or Pony Force? YOU DECIDE!

By: Jay, Kid B, and other geniuses.

Are you a rebellious teen with a garage band seeking to sweep the underground scene, but find it difficult to tag your team with just the right title?  Maybe you’re an emo fag with a sense of irony looking for just the right play on a B actor’s name?   Maybe you’re still part of some Seattle alternative scene searching the Thesaurus for a catchy, yet offensive name.  Or are you a DJ with a dance/remix set out of this world, but lacking in just the right food reference following “D.J.”  Look no further – Jay and Kid B are longtime music industry insiders, so we know how the game is played and what cookie-cutter formula works.  Our patented method of generating unused band names is sure to rocket you noise makers to the top of the charts!  Just choose from the list below, or, once you’ve discovered the pattern, create your own!

How we do it:

The Rockadore 6660 inputs high tech megabyte mainframe algorithms that pair words, bits and data signature electronics together and spits them out!

The Rockadore 6660 inputs high tech megabyte mainframe algorithms that pair words, bits and data signature electronics together and spits them out!

Choose your own musical adventure! - Examples:

Ronnie and The Uhaul Trailers, tonic glove, gunt, skunk bullet, smell raiders, dicks of soul, invisible fiend, the mists fits, chunk diddly, breakfast champs, tricks for kids, tribe called queer, air biscuit, dj touchebag, cereal killers, sir ass, Ciggy Scardust, David Ho-ey, goober peace, rev. up rush, Lima bean dreamers, Skidney beans, the bladder scanners, Fearlobes, Dottie ruckus and the American screamers, Britney Acne, camel toe jam, Wyoming warlords, beat hump now, scratch n riff, pouty Arabians, snob slobber, dj iq and the retardz, Shroom groom, fumblers of the left handed path, bride of Skankenstein, nfl on LSD, the slow kids, short bus boogie, the hoarse whisperer, don turncoat and the yellow bellies, Pepto Von Bismarck, banana scam, cry wind, poke a hontas, unipopcorn, the mkultras, help me cool me, hello skelter, cat breath, insolent Phatulence, rumpus riders, teen cattle prod, knives of Tallahassee, snob goblins, bell bivy divas, left handed heck, the overdrawn bank accounts

"We ARE Gust of Hair. Thanks, Jay!" -Gust of Hair

“We ARE Gust of Hair. Thanks, Jay!” -Gust of Hair

machine gun orgy, stank jaw, eyes wide shucks, homeless hipsters, otter thought, lollipop trollop, goon nudity, bologna boomerang, beat feeler and the dipshits, Betty Hinn and the fresh spirits, dj sticky pits, mr. Mc feel me, sex of ocean, cussing heart, slush cunt, the slow-cones, hellions of mint, the obgy enemies, fuckbucket, sickey mouse trap, sweet serious, gust of hair, fade to Barack, delicate horn, balding Whisp, sensitive slouch, heel, Hu!, janitor boyz, dj milquetoast and the crunchy lunch, captain coon bomb’s laser manifesto, esoteric kneecap, dickola tesla and the electronic vibrators, tramp camp logistical, the cunt stash apparatus, the nymphtones, sausage psy op orchestra, carot tarrot, the Fannypack elimination, spandex nightmare, horse in tights, wings of gnarlya, mystic movement of the downtrodden dolphin, milky vanilli, Pegasus patchouli, Peggy breath and the virginia slims, soul smell linger, Trenchcoat toast, rubber band grand, hemophiliac hucksters, DJ Rational and the Yogurt Yogis, touch of tongue, tater tot trumpet, tweet tweet terrorist!, pterodactyl scrotum

the porn pork proposition, intercourse instructors, rooster border cartel, declaration of indifference, apathy catechism, butt, weirding rainbow, legion of indecision, inch by inch, special forces milkshake, measles on wheels, stiffy bump, lewd laceration, sag-atha Christie, droop breast, failed figure, murder she hoped, dungosaur, floppy mastodon, dr. Flute great, China Bagina, vajayjay Fadd, dick dust, skin of mt Rushmore, body fluid riot, Humpsack of Notre Dave, dr. No and dj clit, Edward Cung and the Fruit Pumpers, macro machete, darlings of mung, Pythagorean dung, math titties, rat tail rapists, hummmburger, we don’t, lazy tag, wounded talent, raise me up bubble, dirty dirty dirty, hard corn, path to corn, essprite, wirescream, trail of dud, subtraction nipple, boo!, Howard the Dutch, fat yammer, canned thrust, ferocious posture

"I thought it was a bunch of random words and nonsense, but Jay was able to give it an esoteric meaning, and now my all-girl flute-a-fone band is opening for N Sync!" -The Hope Goats

“I thought it was a bunch of random words and nonsense, but Jay was able to give it an esoteric meaning, and now my all-girl flute-a-fone band is opening for N Sync!” -The Hope Goats

Chuck Buddies, The Sylvan Burning Institute, Netfux Subscription, A Cringeworthy Lady’s Night, Remember MTVs?, The Vericose Vains, Poochy and the Humperdinks, The Shrew Man Group, Commie Chung, Air Matress Distress, Murphy Marries Bush Bitch, Tiiight!, The Quads, Condeleeza Rize, Smelly Belly and the Furry Fellas, The Jackson Four, Nahrwall Conspiracy, Lumbar Punctures, 3 on A Meathook, Your Brother Mother and Bear, Smarty Pants, The Wabash Cannonnball, Jam Comedy Def, Madcap Claptrap, Richie Bitch, My Pants, Ed Wood if He Could, Shitty Band Night, The Wilford Brimleys, Cruise 2: Speed Control, Bitch Be Fugly, Nnfected Toe, Hustler Magazine Recall, Crude Oil Postcards, The Groovy Groovers, Shit a Brick, Two Tone Cone, The Breakfast Shlub, The Pipe Cracks, Root Beer Nation, Pleathur Jackets, Crime After Crime, Yo Momma Done Told Me, Hurts Don’t It?, Best of the Best, You suck, The Friar Tuck’s, Ouch!, Grody Commode Continue reading

The Cult of Scientism and Nikola Tesla’s Aether

Scientism, or aether?

Scientism, or aether?

By: Jay

The Reign of Scientism

I recently watched a BBC documentary titled “The Atom: The Illusion of Reality.” In Part 3, the host delves into the last few decades of quantum physics and makes some interesting admissions relevant to subject matter I discuss. The most significant section of the documentary deals with quantum electro dynamics and Dirac’s discovery of the equation that demonstrates anti-matter, and Feynman’s further contribution to this idea. QED posits that space is not a vacuum, but instead exhibits a never-ending cycle of energy that flows in and out of existence, that is borrowed from the future. While that is a complex idea, the main thrust of this essay is not to speculate on that question.

What I want to focus on are the presuppositions of the scientists involved in the documentary, as well as a telling example in the figure of Lisa Randall, how this relates to philosophy of science, and in turn how this is directly connected to pseudoscience that is propagated by the usual establishment suspects, to the detriment of all. After explaining the usage of the particle accelerator in measuring electrons, the host states about the Stanford linear accelerator:

When the physicists [measured electrons in the accelerator] they got their first confirmation there might be a deeper set of rules underpinning the particle zoo. What they discovered from the way the electrons scattered and from their extremely high energy, was conclusive proof that protons have internal structure. In other words, protons were made of more elementary particles. Here were Gell-Man’s quarks….For decades people were confident that the components of the atomic nucleus – protons and neutrons were absolutely fundamental. And now for the first time there was evidence of something deeper. The quark is a tricky and elusive beast. There are six kinds of quarks: up, down, strange, charmed, top and bottom. Also, quarks never exist in isolation with other quarks. This makes them impossible to see directly. We can only infer their presence. Despite these caveats, quarks brought some semblance of order to the particle zoo. In recent years its allowed us to concoct a simple, yet powerful description of how the universe is built up. Basically everything in the universe is made of atoms and is built of quarks and electrons. That’s it.

The ironies in this statement will not be lost on regular readers. For several years now I have written against scientism and analyzed presuppositions and worldviews. What most specialists and scientists in their respective fields fail to understand due to their specialization is the nature of worldviews and how they work. I don’t mean to devolve into psychologism, but I mean instead actual epistemology and metaphysics. Those trained in sound philosophy can easily see what’s at work here, as we unpack this astounding claim, and suffice to say this host and the documentary summarize the standard, mainline approach to these questions you would encounter (as I did) in mainline academia and universities.

Let’s analyze – the first problem with this statement is the question of the scientific method itself. Almost the entire academic world has, for centuries, been under the delusion that the “scientific method” is the best and only reliable means for arriving at an approximation of the natural world. Religion, speculation, emotions, etc., are all lumped into a similar dustbin, giving us no useful data relevant to science. Science, the argument goes, relies on some amorphous form of “reason” (though none of these pragmatists have any idea what exactly reason itself is), that provides us with calculable, generally mathematical results.

These results of the experiments thus confirm or refute any given theory, by some probabilistic approximation. Empirical science can never give absolute certainty, as that is something impossible. Instead, positivistic science and empirical research can give us the highest likely scenario about a given phenomenon, so long as the data lines up with the theory. In the words of one of the scientists in the documentary, “Shut up and calculate.” Allusion is generally made to some assumed belief of the ancient world, such as that Aristotle erroneously thought x, y, z. Thus, they gloriously proclaim, the empirical scientific method is the only reliable source of knowledge about the external world, and computers and iPods prove this to be so. The assumption there being that the Dark Ages was one of rampant superstition, while the scientific revolution brought man out of his self-imposed bondage, and into the light of reason, as Kant famously said.

"M'lady!"

“M’lady!”

Such is the mythology surrounding scientism, and its incorrect narrative of how history has progressed and how the scientific method is the only reliable, all-encompassing Rosetta Stone of gnosis. In reality, the global standardized university system is an epistemic cartel dogmatically committed to enforcing naïve empiricism and reductionist materialism, as well as centuries old, outdated “mass consumption” physics. Granted, not every “scientist” is party to this conspiracy, but without a doubt, no one graduates to international prominence without passing the qualifications of the Royal Society’s Holy Office of scientific inquisition. Nikola Tesla and his classified and confiscated work is a perfect example of this international materialist/monetarist control – but more on that later.

Continue reading

Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!

 

Or, Gödel Versus the New World Order

By: Jay

In the land of the blind, the 80s black science guy with 80s black guy mustache is king.  In a recent interview, high priest of neo-Darwinian scientism, Neil de Grasse Tyson expounded the true profundity of his worldview.  Tyson stated on a recent podcast:

“interviewer: At a certain point it’s just futile.

dGT: Yeah, yeah, exactly, exactly. My concern here is that the philosophers believe they are actually asking deep questions about nature. And to the scientist it’s, what are you doing? Why are you concerning yourself with the meaning of meaning?

(another) interviewer: I think a healthy balance of both is good.

dGT: Well, I’m still worried even about a healthy balance. Yeah, if you are distracted by your questions so that you can’t move forward, you are not being a productive contributor to our understanding of the natural world. And so the scientist knows when the question “what is the sound of one hand clapping?” is a pointless delay in our progress.

[insert predictable joke by one interviewer, imitating the clapping of one hand]

dGT: How do you define clapping? All of a sudden it devolves into a discussion of the definition of words. And I’d rather keep the conversation about ideas. And when you do that don’t derail yourself on questions that you think are important because philosophy class tells you this. The scientist says look, I got all this world of unknown out there, I’m moving on, I’m leaving you behind. You can’t even cross the street because you are distracted by what you are sure are deep questions you’ve asked yourself. I don’t have the time for that. [Note to the reader: I, like Neil, live and work in Manhattan, and I can assure you that I am quite adept at crossing the perilous streets of the metropolis.]

interviewer [not one to put too fine a point on things, apparently]: I also felt that it was a fat load of crap, as one could define what crap is and the essential qualities that make up crap: how you grade a philosophy paper? [5] Continue reading