Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson – Jay Dyer

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!

  Or, Gödel Versus the New World Order By: Jay In the land of the blind, the 80s black science guy with 80s black guy mustache is king.  In a recent interview, high priest of neo-Darwinian scientism, Neil de Grasse Tyson expounded the true profundity of his worldview.  Tyson stated on a recent podcast: "interviewer: At a certain point it's just futile. dGT: Yeah, yeah, exactly, exactly. My concern here is that the philosophers believe they are actually asking deep questions about nature. And to the scientist it's, what are you doing? Why are you concerning yourself with the meaning of meaning? (another) interviewer: I think a healthy balance of both is good. dGT: Well, I'm still worried even about a healthy balance. Yeah, if you are distracted by your questions so that you can't move forward, you are not being a productive contributor to our understanding of the natural world. And so the scientist knows when the question "what is the sound of one hand clapping?" is a pointless delay in our progress. [insert predictable joke by one interviewer, imitating the clapping of one hand] dGT: How do you define clapping? All of a sudden it devolves into a discussion of the definition of words. And I'd rather keep the conversation about ideas. And when you do that don't derail yourself on questions that you think are important because philosophy class tells you this. The scientist says look, I got all this world of unknown out there, I'm moving on, I'm leaving you behind. You can't even cross the street because you are distracted by what you are sure are deep questions you've asked yourself. I don't have the time for that. [Note to the reader: I, like Neil, live and work in Manhattan, and I can assure you that I am quite adept at crossing the perilous streets of the metropolis.] interviewer [not one to put too fine a point on things, apparently]: I also felt that it was a fat load of crap, as one could define what crap is and the essential qualities that make up crap: how you grade a philosophy paper? [5]

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!

dGT [laughing]: Of course I think we all agree you turned out okay.

interviewer: Philosophy was a good Major for comedy, I think, because it does get you to ask a lot of ridiculous questions about things.

dGT: No, you need people to laugh at your ridiculous questions.

interviewers: It’s a bottomless pit. It just becomes nihilism.

dGT: nihilism is a kind of philosophy”

This is so ridiculous, I am at a loss as to where to begin.  Tyson represents the latest, popular PR front man for the New Atheist club that have taken the Internet, bookstores, sub reddits and mama’s basement-bound neckbeards by storm.  Before launching into this, I would like to remind readers that just as the media’s fixation and focus on planned events is engineered, so is the obsession and worship of these faces of so-called science.  These “scientists” are given to you as men to follow and look up to, when they are utter and complete fools. Let’s unpack this.

Tyson’s statements are ahistorical beyond belief.  Like any discipline, philosophy is a broad subject that encompasses all kinds of associations and related fields.  Philosophy relates to mathematics, in number theory.  Philosophy relates to technology, insofar as computer technology emerges from the philosophical presuppositions of Leibniz.  Philosophy relates to modern scientific methodology, as modern science originated from philosophers.  Aristotle, the father of science, was a philosopher.  Logic, which is the science of argumentation is philosophy.  Logic directly relates to mathematics and math theory.  Tyson uses words, and words are part of a linguistic web, which is philosophy.  Philosophy of science is an entire sub discipline, but the New Atheists have spoken from Olympus on that, too, as Feynman famously said: “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.”

It's so liberal and sciencey!

It’s so liberal and sciencey!

Have these men ever taken a philosophy class?  Surely they were required to study basic logic in their undergraduate program, do they not recall the connection and association of logic with the mathematics they use in their physics?  That these so-called academics can make such ignorant, untrue statements suggests they are not all they appear to be – they are actually con men for a longtime British Royal Society and Oxford Inner Party plan to implement mass atheistic socialism and idiocy.  Lest you doubt me on that claim, you will find it openly in the writings of Bertrand Russell in works like The Impact of Science on Society, C.G. Darwin’s The Next Million Years, Koestler’s Ghost in the Machine, the works of H.G. Wells, and a thousand other technocrats openly proclaim their “final revolution” to establish a world government.  And it’s not accidental these devils rise from the Satanic smoke of England.

It is these frauds and liars that Kurt Gödel had interacted with and read that resulted in Gödel’s famous paranoia and “freak out” stage in his latter days.  Gödel claimed to have discovered a great cover up – these circles and networks in Illuminist-connected institutions in Austria had been suppressing discoveries.  Philosophy blogger Aldus writes of Gödel:

“Perhaps the greatest logician of all time, Kurt Gödel uncovered the existence of a world-wide conspiracy to make men less intelligent. For years Gödel had been very interested in the work of Gottfried Leibniz, whose characteristica universalis influenced Gödel’s use of symbolism in his famous incompleteness proofs, and went so far as to request copies of the voluminous Leibniz manuscripts to be brought to the United States during the second World War. Gödel initially claimed to have discovered evidence of a conspiracy suppressing Leibniz’s work—that Leibniz had in fact completed the famously unfinished (and unfinishable) universal language of thought, but had been prevented from publishing it. In conversation, Gödel suggested that the Viennese Academy of Science, officially inaugurated in the mid-19th century, had in fact been founded by Leibniz in secret some centuries before; its record books, which contained references to the complete characteristica universalis, had been systematically destroyed.”

This is no speculation.  Readers and friends question me regularly as to why I keep reiterating the importance of this issue, as it was the center of my debate with Jan Irvin. Gödel interacted with Russell, and was aware of the open conspiracy Russell and his British Illuminist Fabian socialist comrades had proclaimed.  Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorums were a result of mathematical debates with Russell, demonstrating ultimately the inability of pure math to justify math itself.  In philosophical language, this means classical foundationalist epistemology, upon which the naïve empiricist worldview is erected, is incoherent nonsense.  Gödel was not insane: he had stumbled upon the new world order:

“Gödel came to believe not only that this conspiracy against Leibniz still existed, but that it was currently preventing the public from understanding the significance of his own (Gödel’s) work (which, for the curious, proved that any complex formal system cannot be both consistent and complete: that there will always exists truths that are true, but unprovable in the system, and that one of these truths is the very consistency of that system. Gödel evidently understood this result as proving man’s ability to intuit mathematics in a Platonic sense, since no formal procedure can produce all truths).

Gödel, in terror of the conspiracy, rarely published, and eventually wasted away after the death of his wife. Without her care, he starved himself to death in the late 70’s. The accepted explanation is that his death was a result of the over-zealous application of the principle of sufficient reason: that everything happens for a reason–the guiding principle of both philosophers and paranoiacs.”

Oxford Inner Party.

Oxford Inner Party.

Or, the new world order, which we now know is more real than real was involved in suppressing and destroying the truth that Gödel and others like him had come to.  John Nash, the famous game theorist and mathematician had a similar situation – claims of grand conspiracy, and recall that Nash was involved the NSA, all of which was chalked up to paranoid schizophrenia, as in the film A Beautiful Mind, with Russell Crowe.  Nash wondered if there were conspiracies at work, connected to mass media and publications, and that red communists were seeking to take over the United States.  While Nash may have been driven insane by harassment and who knows what, it is possible that he was targeted, fearing indirectly the same entity Gödel feared: the British-run socialists.  Wikipedia states:

“Nash began to show signs of extreme paranoia and his wife later described his behavior as erratic, as he began speaking of characters like Charles Herman and William Parcher who were putting him in danger. Nash seemed to believe that all men who wore red ties were part of a communist conspiracy against him. Nash mailed letters to embassies in Washington, D.C., declaring that they were establishing a government.”

So how does this relate to Neil de Grasse Tyson?  Well, the New Atheists a la Dawkins and company appear to be run out of Oxford, still.  Oxford is the pinnacle of the Illuminist pyramid, where the Inner Party of Fabian socialist technocrats know they are selling the world wholesale on utter bullshit, from outdated Darwinian theories, to climate change, to dehumanization and Marxism, the global center of world bullshit just happens to also be the global center of the highest levels of technocratic control.   This is who Orwell was talking about in 1984.   Tyson, then, is a mere minion of these faux elite con men.  The real secret is that the goal is not progress, but destruction.   The New Atheist crew are a front for more sinister powers, functioning as ad men selling phony worldviews to the idiot public who feels they are part of the club scientific elite by parroting the party line of these hucksters.

For years I have been railing about the dishonesty and utter crap from these men, and Tyson’s now viral interview demonstrates everything I have said in past critiques about these frauds.  Tyson admits that truth doesn’t matter.  Philosophy, the search for truth (and wisdom), is not what Tyson and his comrades care about, yet the entire goal of science from its beginnings has always been about learning the truth about the natural world and reality itself (metaphysics).  So Tyson’s quote is a vindication of everything I’ve said.  After hundreds of debates with clones of his ilk, the echo chamber of relativism can apparently never be silenced.  The reason you cannot put an end to the fallacies and lies of these men is because they hate what is true, and know they are lying.  Yet Tyson purports, like the rest of his crew, to publicly debate issues utilizing reason and logic.  But logic is philosophy – and philosophy is useless!

What this means is that Neil de Grasse Tyson knows his job has nothing to do with truth and science, but with projecting a false worldview and selling it to a mass audience to dumb them all down.  Whether Tyson himself knows this or not is up for debate, but that is his use as a tool, like the rest of his loser New Atheist crew.  Philosophy cannot and will never die, because it is reality.  The globalist Fabian socialist attempt to rewrite all reality with a synthetic, Satanic inversion to entrap the masses will only entrap them – he who digs a pit will fall into it, as Scripture says.  It is not a worldview where meaning is real and eternal that leads to nihilism, it is demonstrably the worldview of scientism promoted as their new gospel by the New Atheists that is fundamentally nihilistic, as they attempt to enclose men in a mental and metaphysical prison of materialism and evolutionary determinism.

Leibniz, Tesla, Gödel, Pauli, and Heisenberg – these are real philosophical scientists.  These are men who dared to challenge the dominant bullshit worldviews of their day and make real progress and discovery.  The frauds presented to us that propagandize with ridiculous pseudo-science notions like global warming and New Atheism aren’t even men.  Dawkins, Dennett, Nye and Tyson aren’t worth a toenail from Leibniz, Tesla, Gödel, Pauli or Heisenberg.  And why is it you don’t hear about or learn about these men, yet have the hucksters forced down your throat?  Precisely because I am right about a conspiracy to keep you dumbed down, focused on these clowns, and distracted from great men.  These losers don’t have truth or logic – they rail against it.  They will lose and we will win.

“I think that modern physics has definitely decided in favor of Plato. In fact the smallest units of matter are not physical objects in the ordinary sense; they are forms, ideas which can be expressed unambiguously only in mathematical language.” -Werner Heisenberg

You want a science meme? Here.

You want a science meme? Here.

57 Comments on Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson – Jay Dyer

  1. Lance Steele // June 10, 2014 at 11:12 pm // Reply

    A truly excellent article. Thanks.

  2. Great article.

    Google black futurists.

    Blackness is marketing gold. DeGrasse Tyson, Obama, Mandela, Angelou and so many more — all selling shyte. LGBT people are useful for psyco-sexual mind rape (Pussy Riot/Femen/Gaga). Dawkins is a Royal Society paedophile.

    Parasitic globalists ARE a race apart. They are perpetrating slow motion genocide. Uncle Neil is here to personally lead you to the gas chamber.

  3. Tyson doesn’t even have anything published in a peer review journal. The only thing that comes back in search at Google Scholar is to his popular dumbed-down science books. He doesn’t practice his craft in any meaningful way, and certainly cannot be respected among real working astrophysicists. He’s a talking head for scientism, nothing more.

  4. No, I haven’t. It’s very interesting. I have no opinions on Godel and Leibniz either, except to say that the latter -for whatever it’s worth – has been influenced by Lurianic Kabbalah (as I mentioned a while back). I don’t think I would understand them if I tried. I respect people who do though.

    • As I understand they both were, but really a lot of that is Platonism and neo Platonism in new garb.

    • The advanced physics stuff is the next level. I can decode and grasp most technical metaphysics but I’m still on the outer arena of stuff like Godel. I’ve worked my way through a good bit of Hofstadter, but guys like Pauli and Godel are the next level. I’d like to get to that level.

  5. The Leibniz/Godel suppression material in the contemporary sense runs through Larouche — fascinating stuff, really. Miles Mathis provides a fairly solid analysis of Larouche here:

    More on Godel and Leibniz in this series of books by a group who purport themselves to be the “Pythagorean Illuminati”


    The central figures of the book run through Plato and Leibniz, along with Goethe, Hegel, William Blake, and various other characters from the Rational/Ideal schools of thought.

    • Joaquin Hermon // October 9, 2015 at 9:23 am // Reply

      Miles Mathis is a paranoid schizophrenic whose idiotic science articles are surpassed in lunacy only by his conspiracy theories. He hasn’t proven a single thing in science and none of his conspiracies pass the sniff test. He thinks Pi equals 4.0 and neither he nor any of his few remaining groupies have the brains to run an experiment. Of course an experiment that fails to show Pi=4.0 would show him up for the worthless kook that he is.
      Stop referencing this lying, lazy, inept buffoon.
      Mathis is nothing but a crackpot, and that is all he will ever be.

      • Joaquin,

        I Just recently stumbled onto Miles’s art site. Much of the articles, or as you refer to “conspiracy theories” seem at least interesting. As a none native English speaker I find his unique approach angle of a new “conspiracy” topics very curious. Your description of him is very harsh, and of course if you are correct- so be it. Since you’ve called him; a paranoid schizophrenic, worthless kook, lying, lazy, inept buffoon, and nothing but a crackpot… are you also suggesting that the paintings on his site are not his own, and that he is a total fraud?

  6. Grasse’s vest is that of a 1980s TV astrologer. It’s the outfit of an entertainer. Good catch on the 1980s mustache. He reminds me of the man affectionately referred to, post Star Wars, as “the world’s most handsome black man” – Billy Dee Williams.

  7. Todd Lewis // March 17, 2015 at 7:35 pm // Reply

    Proof the Rockefeller’s want to dumb people down:

    “In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions fade from their minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply…The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are. So we will organize our children and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shops and on the farm.” – General Education Board, Occasional Papers, No. 1 (General Education Board, New York, 1913) p. 6.

    Sounds like the satanic NWO to me.

  8. Todd Lewis // March 18, 2015 at 1:54 pm // Reply


    Have you looked into the occult beliefs of the Founding Fathers?

    This is an interesting documentary on those beliefs:

    Or the Atlantian/Occult view of America:

  9. Todd Lewis // March 23, 2015 at 3:32 am // Reply

    I have a question. I don’t have twitter or facebook. Is there any other way I might contact you?

  10. I just discovered you today and have been enjoying listening to you and reading your articles.

    Just wondered what you mean when you write, “philosophy is reality”? Would be great to understand where you are coming from with this.

    Also wondered what you think of Deleuze who conceived of philosophy as “the production of concepts” which would seem to me to lead away from reality.

    Thanks in advance!

  11. Thank you for this. I’m very much a layman when it comes to philosophy and science. But it seems obvious that Tyson while well schooled and intelligent, has a group of self-loathing lemmings following him around who seem to be consumed with white guilt.
    I’m sure he speaks of some accurarte things. My view is that he’s only helping to create a substitute religion.

  12. Loved this one…the comments too… thanks Jay

  13. lots of research to do after reading this page!

  14. This documentary about Ted Kaczynski suggests that he made some of the same discoveries:

  15. Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
    He should’ve been laughed out the room for that “whether you believe it or not” line. It should’ve disgraced him, because science is the method, not the result. The arrogance of a bloke who fiddles with telescopes.
    “philosophers believe they are actually asking deep questions about nature” Clearly he doesn’t understand science is a philosophical tradition, without the philosophy of science he wouldn’t have a job.

  16. Is this from the Nerdist podcast with Chris Hardwick?

  17. Clicking on your Aldus link on Godel I found the entire site was memory-holed. Thank goodness that the Wayback Machine still exists. But for how long?

  18. I dig your work Jay. The only bone I’ve got to pick is with this statement:
    “Aristotle, the father of science, was a philosopher.” Science was long instituted before the establishment of Western society.

    The philosophical underpinnings of these initiated scientists portrayed by the media, from my perspective, appear to be triggering a new era of enlightenment. The days will soon be gone of taking oaths to receive the Mysteries. The truth of syncretized esoteric knowledge is readily accessible to us now, but still requires an awakening. If our DNA is latent storage of all that has ever been known and experienced by man, then these “keymaster” are unlocking the doors for us. I consider it all bread crumbs to find the path. Those who continue to seek will indeed find. DgT’s Cosmic interpretations very much speak to my consciousness. I have found, that I do not align with all philosophers, and could probably critique to the extent you did, but I simply take what resonates, and chuck that which doesn’t.

    Certainly there is mis- and disinfo, with agents galore, but Truth finds us right where we are. Yes, research the Twa/San Peoples, Kemetic and Dogon Mysteries… Aristotle gives credence to his predecessors of scientific thought.

  19. Nice raft of things to investigate here. I have noticed that the establishment constantly and purposely confuses the scientific method with current, highly publicized, hypotheses and theories.

  20. An excellent post Jay, brought to my attention by someone on Twitter. I have been reading Springmeier’s work and he suggests that bloodline families make use of genius genetics to do brain stem scarring at 18 months etc followed by trauma based mind control. He claims that John Nash was one such victim. Tyson is a cheap Vaudeville showman.

  21. Markustherealist // July 6, 2017 at 3:55 am // Reply

    Hi Jay,

    Thanks for a great article, I would include the wet rag science “educator” Brian Cox in the same vain as DgT, only a slightly more whiney, British version. Smarmy dirtbag can’t even answer a straight question. Check this bullshit, on Australia’s Q and A (a show normally reserved for political rhetoric and showmanship). Pathetic! And 95% of the Australian population are suckered into this garbage, which shows just what happens in this society when anyone dares to question the scientific concesus. Disgusting ‘science for hire’ is truly making us a world of idiots! Thanks for the indepth analysis and interesting perspective you always deliver, it is truly appreciated.

  22. Markustherealist // July 6, 2017 at 3:56 am // Reply

    oops, forgot the link…

  23. Neil deGrasse Tyson’s Job Description in his own words

  24. I recently viewed the 2014 documentary “The Principle” and found your comments very appropos, Jay. Advanced physics indicates that the Earth is the center of the universe, and all the stars and galaxies actually revolve around the Earth. But this conclusion contradicts the established Copernican or cosmological “principle” that the Earth just revolves around the Sun and has no special significance in the universe. (Nietzsche cited this principle to claim that “God is dead.”) After explaining how their data supported this conclusion, some of the participant scientists interviewed for the documentary backed down and claimed their words were twisted by the producer. Like their reaction to “The Principle,” the shameful treatment of Halton Arp by his colleagues for making similar discoveries and conclusions indicates a conspiracy designed to ensure ignorance of Earth’s specialness, which can only be attributed to a divine, personal creator. Nietzsche notwithstanding, apparently Logos lives, and the universe proves it.

  25. Reading this post reminded me to pick up a copy of Godel Escher Bach, so thank you for that. I have a limited understanding of metaphysics, but the ideas expressed in this article brought to mind the writing of Charles Fort, specifically the early chapters of the Book of the Damned. All things are in a state of intermediateness, we attempt to find the universal in the local, nothing can be proven because there is nothing to prove, Darwin never defines species, and the like.
    Fun stuff

13 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson — State of Globe
  2. Link Pot Pie (16 Chardad, 1384 Y.Z.) - Conspiracy Archive
  3. The Age of Transition and Scientism Fraud | Jay's Analysis
  4. The age of transition and scientism fraud – Intellihub
  5. The Age of Transition and Scientism Fraud | A Sweet Dose of Reality
  6. “The Age of Transition and Scientism Fraud” | An Outsider's Sojourn II
  7. Scientism: The Joke’s on You | The Soul of the East
  8. Doba tranzicije i izdaja znanstvenika | Kali Tribune
  9. The Age of Transition and Scientism Fraud | Sei herzlich Willkommen beim Dude
  10. Revolt of the Star Children | The Soul of the East
  11. Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson | angelodandreablog
  12. “Scientism: The Joke’s On You” – An Outsider's Sojourn II
  13. The Age of Transition and Scientism Fraud by Jay Dyer – AetherForce

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: