The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed

Wikileaks, Part Deux. Image: Truthseeker.co.uk

Wikileaks, Part Deux. Image: Truthseeker.co.uk

By: Jay Dyer One of the evident patterns that emerges concerning the theater of operations known as "media" is the never-ending rabbit hole of trails and endless, conflicting details that don't and won't add up concerning a figure like Edward Snowden.  The application of the military term "theater of operations" is especially relevant here, since we swim in a sea of media theater and infotainment.  This is not by accident: The theater of infotainment itself is an important pillar of the Infowar.  With Edward Snowden, the recent star of the world media acting stage, the trails and legend(s) surrounding his back story are purposefully misleading. Concerning this intentional labyrinth of false leads and bogus details, analyst Jon Rappoport comments: "Of course, the American people don’t consider all these potential elements of the Snowden affair. (More on the various potential elements of the Snowden affair can be found here under the #Spygate heading on my blog (top right hand side link).) Although they watch spy movies and television shows, they don’t believe, when push comes to shove, that intelligence operations have layers and false trails and cover stories and limited hangouts.  They don’t believe that deception can run that deep. They don’t stop to realize that all spies are trained to lie.  Lying convincingly is the number-one requisite for a spy. Lie to enemies, lie to friends, lie to the press, lie to other agencies of government.  If a spy doesn’t wake up every day thinking about what lies he’ll tell from breakfast to dinner, he’s a dud. A washout. A danger to himself and others.  Spies live in a labyrinth of deceit. It takes a certain kind of personality to thrive in that atmosphere."

Wikileaks, Part Deux. Image: Truthseeker.co.uk

Followers of my site have had differing views of Snowden.  Most readers, like most Amerikans, accept him as what he presented himself as – a genuine whistleblower that had a Damascus Road conversion to patriotic sentiment, disagreeing only on whether he was a “traitor” or “patriot.”   Few and far between are the thinking readers willing to accept the possibility of the depths of deception in such affairs, but as fellow philosophers know, basic logic and critical thinking, some years in media analysis and basic knowledge of espionage and geo-politics will provide a thinker with the requisite skills to sift wheat from chaff in the “news.”

Now, having revealed he was a trained CIA operative, and not just an analyst, Snowden has called into question his entire whistleblower back story (that we questioned all along).  In other words, Snowden has in effect said, “I wasn’t really an analyst, I was a professional liar.”  Only a fool would continue to believe something already questionable from a now admitted liar, yet the theater of media operations will continue on foisting Snowden in our faces unabated, as full spectrum dominance must first and foremost control minds and opinions through Infowar.

James Bamford's 2998 book, The Shadow Factory. Image: Amazon.

James Bamford’s 2008 book, The Shadow Factory. Image: Amazon.

My thesis is to ignore the minutiae and details, which only serve to distract, making the entire discussion about Snowden, Snowden, Snowden.  Meanwhile, no NSA major programs have been halted or ceased.  No revelation from Snowden so far was anything that wasn’t already known!  This aspect is a huge key – whistleblowers presumably reveal something hidden that endangers them, leading to Snowden’s attempts to flee to China, Russia, etc.  Remember when Julian Assange was holed up in Britain?   How absurd is it that Mi5 couldn’t get to Assange, while trapped under house arrest in the UK?   Likewise with bin Laden being interviewed by the major networks while on the run, now Snowden who feared for his life, meets with Brian Williams and wants to come back to the US.   Why not?  His revelations so far have been nothing new.  This, in my analysis, is what everyone seems to have forgotten.  It’s not merely that there are other whistleblowers that are ignored, but that the scant few “revelations” from Snowden were already found in James Bamford’s book, The Shadow Factory, published in 2008.

Bamford wrote in 2008:

“By the summer of 1997, the PacketScopes were fully in operation.  But what the AT&T engineers never counted on was a massive terrorist attack and a president’s decision to ignore existing privacy laws.  By the fall of late 2001, Hayden succeeded in gaining the secret cooperation of nearly all the nation’s telecommunications giants for his warrantless eavesdropping program.  Within a year, engineers were busy installing highly secret, heavily locked rooms in key AT&T switches, among them Bridgeton, New York City, and the company’s major West Coast central office in San Francisco.  From then on the data – including both address and information and content – would flow through the PacketScopes directly to the NSA.” (pg. 181)

 

The 1977 ARPANET, connected to RAND, Harvard, Stanford, London, etc., and the satellite grid.

The 1977 ARPANET, connected to RAND, Harvard, Stanford, London, etc., and the satellite grid.

The major globalist intelligence establishment is well aware of Bamford’s books.  Bamford’s book outlines the entire architecture of how the spying occurs, and it has been going on a lot longer than most thought.  As I detailed in my “Robots Over Russia” article, ARPANET, the precursor to DARPANET and the Internet, was clearly designed under the strategy of utilizing these key telecom switch locations.  You can see this from DARPA’s own old diagram of the locations for servers for the nascent Internet. As you can see from the graphic, the 1977 outline includes major locations such as Rutgers, RAND, NYU, XEROX, Stanford, London, etc., as well as satellite linkup. So the real revelation is actually decades older than Bamford – it is the Internet itself that is the big NSA revelation.

But back to Snowden: given Snowden’s major “leak” about PRISM was something essentially known, the fact that the public doesn’t read books, the system knew it could get away with a large media operation that exposed something already exposed.  This is the biggest sign Snowden is not a legitimate character, if “Snowden” is even who he is.  “Edward Snowden” is likely his cover, and as is generally the case with intelligence operations, there’s a clever pun or joke in the name chosen, with “Snowden” being a central character in Joseph Heller’s Catch 22.  Likewise, there is a 2010 episode of Psych, the popular USA Network show that featured Shawn and Gus infiltrating a fake Think Tank run by an operative named “Snowden.”   The goal of the think tank front in the episode involves the assassination of a prominent billionaire.  For readers used to JayAnalysis, the long history of intelligence agencies using pop culture scripts for television and film will come as no surprise.  Hollywood has all along been used as a propaganda vehicle, and for fans of Psych like myself, the prevalence of “twilight language” in the show is striking and hardly coincidental.   This suggests the Snowden affair was planned and prepared years in advance, since Bamford’s book was 2008, the Psych episode was 2010 and Edward Snowden emerged on the star-studded media theater scene in 2013.

Shawn and Gus meet with fake think tank frontman, "Snowden."

Shawn and Gus meet with fake think tank frontman, “Snowden.”

If you think that’s the end of the labyrinth, get ready – now there will be a Sony Pictures version of the Snowden Affair, reportedly to be directed by Oliver Stone and based on Glenn Greenwald’s book on Snowden!  (I should add that the Greenwald book affair is itself sketchy, as Sibel Edmonds has shown.)  The same psy ops team that brought you the pinnacle of fake news’ greatest hits, Zero Dark Thirty will be bringing you the Snowden tale.  This is why I call it the theater of media operations.  The goal here seems to be a classic of psychological warfare – to blend fiction and reality to such a point that the two cannot be divided.  A public drowning in toxic chemicals in food and media, raised on TV and lacking in any modicum of critical thinking is utterly unable to unwrap the Chinese finger trap that is Snowden.   And that is by design.  However, you can rest assured that when your whistleblower becomes a movie star, just like Assange and the failed Wikileaks movie, The Whistleblower, be assured that the intelligence-controlled film powers are projecting a celluloid hero of their own making.  Real whistleblowers don’t get media fandom in the theater of operations – they get ignored or killed.  The theater of media operations is simply the flip side of Hollywood – it is faux opposition Infotainment for the Infowar.

At this juncture, John Young’s interview with RT concerning the controlled nature of Wikileaks thus applies equally to Snowden.

19 Comments on The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed

  1. Where-Wolf // June 4, 2014 at 10:24 pm // Reply

    Why the NSA/CIA/disinfo circle jerk?

    Anglo-Zionist gangsters and intelligence minions. All crimminals. No good guys.

    None of this matters if your team is the American People. Get it?

  2. modernlifesurvivalist // June 5, 2015 at 6:03 pm // Reply

    ” The theater of media operations is simply the flip side of Hollywood – it is faux opposition Infotainment for the Infowar.”

    It’s all a part of the Neverending Story, Jay. 😉

    When you use the term “Infowar,” are you using a preexisting term, or only proliferating the term coined by Alex Jones? I guess I could always look this up myself…

  3. Hello,

    I’m very interested in your articles and would like to congratulate you for your research and writings. The fact is that you often put words on my thoughts, but this article is one clear exception: your demonstration here is actually quite convincing but I feel like you haven’t considered one capital question -> why would they have voluntarily leaked the NSA thing? Since before Snowden it was widely considered a crazy conspiracist theory to defend that everybody was being spied on and now this idea has undeniably gained in credibility. Your answer may probably clear up my mind…

    Thanks again for your work and keep it flowin !

    • It was already in Bamfords books

      • Which didn’t reach a significative audience… While the whole world knows about Snowden’s stuff.

      • I’m not trying to refute your point -as I said it’s actually quite well-founded – but I’m saying without a motive it can’t be defended

    • The most obvious motive is just the one Rappaport describes – ‘in order to have a police state, people have to know that there’s a police state.’ This particular revelation of the method is a clever one, it comes not from Obama on the telepodium, but from a ‘whistleblower,’ whereupon… nothing happens, and the people just accept it, with the seeds of fear and self-censorship duly planted.

  4. Reblogged this on Jay's Analysis and commented:

    The arrival of the Snowden movie shows my 2014 analysis to have been correct.

  5. The Shame of U.S. Based Journalism …is
    February 5, 2015 at 6:42pm

    by Tracy Mapes

    SACRAMENTO,California -in fact that many of the Current On-Air-Talent was culled for the unlikely source of Prisoners and Street Prostitutes, many of which came from the Sacramento Area of California.

    The Prostitution aspect along with the use of such Narcotics as Heroin appears to be being utilized as a “Mind Control” Feature along with the Degradational Effects of “Hazing” these people into “Compliance” by setting firm examples of what their lives could consist of without complete compliance and cooperation of their “Handlers”.

    These People that I have purposely Identified to show a Pattern of Incident and Distribution has remained unchallenged for over 4 Years.
    It includes the Names of Two Presidents of the United States, a First Lady, the Duchess of York, a Republican Vice Presidential hopeful of 2008, and an as yet unlisted Justice of the Supreme Court.

    The Disturbing Pattern not only points to a significant Influence of American Politic across the board, but lends itself toward Criminal Racketeering in the effort to Disenfranchise the Entire American Political Process and the Free Press as these people are used to supply “The Advantaged” with sexual favors and escort services.

    These Illegal Actions, Infiltrations and Subversion of the Free Press and Government cannot be allowed to Stand, as Its Danger to the Public Good is All to Clear.

    See: President and the Press Speech of April 27, 1961 by President John F. Kennedy.

    Here are the Lists I have compiled on American Journalists so far:

    Media Subversion List 2010

    Media Subversion List 2012

    Media Subversion Map of Sacramento and Hub Distribution United States

    You can also find Court Records from Sacramento County Superior Court for approximately 20
    Subjects Listed in regard to the participation in PC 647b activity related to prostitution, at this
    Address: https://www.facebook.com/notes/tracy-mapes/presidents-media-and-the-war-against-the-people-of-the-united-states/10152301796448280

    Take Care,

    -Tracy Mapes

    Eventually, All of this Bullshit has to come out.

  6. Edward Snowden is an ex-KMAX 31 Employee. This is all bullshit theater.

  7. Apropos the deceitfulness that is the sine-qua-non of spookdome, I’ve yet to see a more accurate and succinct definition than that of Joseph Persico in his book “Roosevelt’s Secret War: FDR and World War II Espionage”:

    Espionage involves peeking at the other fellow’s hand, marking the cards, cooking the books, poisoning the well, breaking the rules, hitting below the belt, cheating, lying, deceiving, defaming, snooping, eavesdropping, prying, stealing, bribing, suborning, burglarizing, forging, misleading, conducting dirty tricks, dirty pool, skulduggery, blackmail, seduction, everything not sporting, not kosher, not cricket. In short, espionage stands virtue on its head and elevates vice instead.

    But that’s OK because its all in the good cause of Nat-Sec and ‘protecting from the baddies eh?

    Whenever you are tempted to think “They simply wouldn’t DO that”, then you can bet your life that not only would they, but they almost certainly already have.

  8. Yep, Snowden looks like a rat because he IS a rat. #justsaynotorodents

  9. Alberto fontanez // October 5, 2016 at 2:41 pm // Reply

    As usual you are always on point j keep up the good work and it’s funny they’re mostly all the Bond movies are related to some of the stuff that is going on in the past few years. Also in my opinion I think that Edward Snowden is nothing but a fraud a fake there’s nothing but control opposition dialectics always in play good versus bad Red vs. Blue James Bond always gets the girl

17 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed - The Rundown Live
  2. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed | Conspiracy Wire
  3. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed | bigpzone.com
  4. Waking Up Wisconsin » The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed
  5. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed — State of Globe
  6. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed |
  7. The Theater of Media Operations: Snowden Analyzed · Real Strange News
  8. US-EU Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) Will Have Devastating Social and Environmental Consequences | PITTSBURGHPRESS
  9. The Theater of Media Operations | RIELPOLITIK
  10. Jade Helm as Itself a Psy Op | Jay's Analysis
  11. Jade Helm as Itself a Psy Op | Logos and Liberty
  12. Jade Helm as Itself a Psy Op
  13. Is Jade Helm a Psyop? | Sheep Media
  14. SPECTRE (2015): Tentacles of the All-Seeing Surveillance Octopus | Jay's Analysis
  15. Secrets of SPECTRE | Espionage History Archive
  16. Steve Pieczenik Talks
  17. Boiler Room EP #75

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: