Star Trek Beyond (Distinctions) – SJWs in Space!

There will be no Jim Crow space laws!

There will be no Jim Crow space laws!


By: Jay Dyer

The last Star Trek reboot saw Benedict Cumberbatch as Kahn, the berserk super soldier who was angry about the “Federation” doing some such nefarious thing to his people group.  This installment  included curious references to false flags which I detailed here. Before that, in the initial reboot, there was an angry alien who attacked the Federation over his tribal group being shat upon (or, Shatnered upon!).  So, for the third time in a row, we have roughly the same plot of dispossessed, discontent tribalists and unique people groups who become terrorists when their way of life is encroached upon by the United Nations, er, NATO, er, New World Order, er…Federation.

We have seen this pattern often in the Star Trek, but in the recent installment, it’s even more pronounced as we discover the character Sulu is gay.  Indeed, trans-specism and the destruction of people groups under liberal tyranny has always been the worldview of Star Trek – Gene Roddenberry was a rabidly atheistic globalist (or, as an even darker possibility, was Roddenberry a member of an occultic group known as ‘The Nine,’?).  There is some interesting evidence connecting Roddenberry (connected to the Esalen Institute – which I covered here) to esoteric groups, mind control and the Rand Corporation.  This would explain the many gnostic, scientistic, platonic and at times interestingly philosophical episodes, in the original series and its Next Generation successor.

Secret Sun blog explains:

“So if you were hawking a sci-fi religion, who better to approach than the creator of the sci-fi sensation of the early/mid 70s? From 2008:

In early 1975, a broke and depressed Roddenberry was approached by a British former race car driver named Sir John Whitmore, who was associated with a strange organization called ‘Lab-9.’ Though unknown to the public, Lab-9 were ostensibly a sort of an independent version of the X-Files, dedicated to the research of paranormal phenomena. However, Lab-9 had another, more complex agenda- they later claimed to be in contact with a group of extraterrestrials called the ‘Council of Nine’…

Lab-9 had wanted to hire Roddenberry to write a screenplay based on the Council of Nine’s imminent return….Lab-9 flew him out to their headquarters, located on a large estate in Ossining, NY. There, Roddenberry met and interviewed several psychics, and prepared the groundwork for his script.

Roddenberry wrote a script called The Nine, in which he fictionalized his experiences at Lab-9 and the message for humanity that the Council of Nine wished to convey…

Beam me up, RAND!

Beam me up, RAND!

(T)his was no ragtag bunch of hippie phreaks that Roddenberry was dealing with…Roddenberry biographer Joel Engel noted that Whitmore introduced Roddenberry to several key figures in the British Broadcasting Corp. as well. “

In regard to the connection to RAND, Opsecnews states:

According to the TrekPlace website Harvey P. Lynn, Jr. (?-1987), a member of the prestigious RAND Corporation, provided Star Trek original series creator Gene Roddenberry with scientific and technical advice during preproduction of the series.

On the Rand Corporation’s website the question is asked whether a RAND researcher designed the initial bridge of the Enterprise. The answer given is, “A Rand researcher, Harvey Lynn, was consulted, but as a private citizen, not as part of a RAND project.”

However in an interview from 1965 Jeffrey Hunter, who played captain Christopher Pike in the Star Trek pilot “The Cage” and preceded William Shatner as first captain of the Enterprise stated “The things that intrigues me the most is that it is actually based on the Rand Corporation’s projection of things to come. Except for the fictional characters, it will be like getting a look into the future and some of the predictions will surely come true in our lifetime.”

The inherent contradiction that Star Trek continually demonstrates is the contradiction of the liberal philosophy – and I mean in this in the classically liberal sense, that radical egalitarianism and atomistic individualism creates a horrid collective gathered around nothing more than liberalism itself.  In this way, liberalism and its epistemic and cultural relativism can only allow for itself, and must destroy and exclude all other options, including even non-liberal democracy.

In numerous Star Trek episodes, we even see the ‘Prime Directive” of the Federation’s commitment to not violating an existing culture violated under the pretended facade of liberal “rights” and values.   Western NGOs and foundations fulfill this very role today, with a cover of aiding the downtrodden, while secretly working for western political ends, as we see in the Soros-funded “White Helmets” scam. (If anyone doubts RAND connections to Hollywood, let’s not forget the 2014 faux scandal of The Interview). Ironically, the new film demonstrates this toxic cultural imperialism explicitly.  GlobalResearch explains:

“Aside from not addressing the darker side of US foreign policy, Hollywood movies like Forrest Gump carry subliminal messages. In the words of the US culture and entertainment magazine Rolling Stone: “The message of Forrest Gump was that if you think about the hard stuff too much, you’ll either get AIDS or lose your legs. Meanwhile, the hero is the idiot who just shrugs and says ‘Whatever!’ whenever his country asks him to do something crazy.” What Rolling Stone is saying that listen to what you are commanded to do.


Then there are movies like American Sniper that collapse US foreign policy into the simplistic notion of individual characters. What this does is collapse the event and the soldiers into one, which means that if ones criticize a US war that you are attacking the soldiers and their convictions. This is hiding behind the soldiers and detracting from the real issue of an illegal invasion and occupation. Nor is there any mention of Abu Ghraib or the false weapons of mass destruction lies. Rolling Stone had this to say about American Sniper: “Sniper is a movie whose politics are so ludicrous and idiotic that under normal circumstances it would be beneath criticism. The only thing that forces us to take it seriously is the extraordinary fact that an almost exactly similar worldview consumed the walnut-sized mind of the president who got us into the war in question. It’s the fact that the movie is popular, and actually makes sense to so many people, that’s the problem,” it also adds. In fact, as a result of the movie there was an increase in hate crimes in the US and negative feelings towards Arabs and Muslims.”

I was tempted to draw up an elaborate analysis of symbols and deeper meanings, but depth was absent in this film.  Other than an odd similarity between the “terrorist” character as a former soldier who went mad from radicalism (traditionalism!) being similar to the D.C. “sniper” event, Admiral Krall is merely a representation of any cultures or people groups who want a more traditional, organic existence and reject the Federation’s globalism.  As such, they are “terrorists” who are impelled by their fury and insanity to bomb the glorious, multi-cultural megalopolis space city Yorktown.  In other words, all groups that aren’t on board with globalism and liberal, inverted monoculture are terrists destined to attack New York.

Krall thus represents the life-extension inherent in the damned traditionalism that will not die in the face of globalism.  Krall is a grotesque icon of the film’s view of patriarchal, honor-based societies as a perpetual reptilian madness that humans must evolve beyond.  If you don’t accept homo-mono-globo-liberalism, you are a terrorist that will unleash bioweapons in New York.  The Holy United Nations and the space brothers have told the Pentagon humanity must evolve beyond distinctions and borders, and Gene and the pope are is its prophets. By the way – if the citizens of the multi cultural Yorktown space station can beam about at will, why didn’t they just beam Admiral Krall into space when he had the bio weapon? Lol oops! #StarCuck #captainJamesTKuck



To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:



Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!

11 Comments on Star Trek Beyond (Distinctions) – SJWs in Space!

  1. “that radical egalitarianism and atomistic individualism creates a horrid collective gathered around nothing more than liberalism itself…” Wonderful summation of how the managed dialectic is herding humanity into the NWO concentration camp. Is this not the consummation of the Enlightenment project? Man’s apotheosis is really his enslavement.

  2. Just saw the movie. The word unity was mentioned a few times which was “coincidentally” one of the main themes of the DNC last week. So essentially, if you don’t support the narrative promoted by the left and the SJW’s you’re a racist, bigot, sexist, terrorist.

  3. Just saw the movie. The term unity was mentioned several times. Also, coincidentally this was one of the main narratives that the DNC was promoting just this past week. So essentially, if you’re not in line with this narrative that the left and the mainstream media has been hyping up you’re a terrorist.

    This illustrates perfectly what you’ve been talking about Jay, how Hollywood is used to socially engineer the views and opinions of the masses.

  4. sorry for the repost, I wasn’t sure my first post made it

  5. Michael Sean // August 1, 2016 at 6:34 am // Reply

    I’ve not seen this film yet. I believe the crew of the Enterprise uses the mighty power of the Beastie Boys to defend themselves in some way or other.

    Possibly the best Star Trek film, in a “so bad it’s great” way is The Final Frontier. Spock’s half brother Space Jesus abducts the enterprise and takes it to the planet where the demiurge lives. “What does God need with a Star Ship?”. I believe in Shatner’s original script Kirk actually takes on God himself.

  6. Krall (Idris Elba), a lizard-like dictator who derives his energy by sucking the life out of his victims? – see ‘Magic without tears’ not a 80’s band but the book by Crowley cpt LXVI: Energy Vampires. “There is a mighty volume of theory and practice concerning this which will be open to you if you attain VIII° of O.T.O. and become Pontiff of the Illuminati. A type of person, fearless and cold-blooded, they shake one’s resolution, kill one’s enthusiasm, devitalize one’s faith and courage. Is it possible to intensify the devitalizing process, to weaken the victim physically to the point of death? Yes… By taking into your body and so preserving the life of his heart, the whole of his vital energies will desert the sinking ship of his physical tissue, and rush to the lifeboat provided by the vampire. There are people running about all over the place who possess, and exercise, faculties similar to those.” Kraal is the Dutch word for an enclosure for cattle.

  7. In the latest Star Trek,I saw and acknowledge, if that was the intent of “the progamers” , that low tech can defeat hight-tech, that powerful technologies are only tools in the hands of fools or teams.

    This Star Trek sucks so much anyway… unable to rightly express the real meaning of deep feelings linking the individual to the group… In other words, pointing to the weakness of liberal doctrines.

  8. this new trilogy is terrible, generic mindless comedy action fest blockbuster that doenst resemble Star Trek in any way

  9. Excellent analysis… thank you, Jay! Planted some big seeds,

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Propaganda Watch: Star Trek’s Gene Roddenberry Was A Rabidly Atheistic Globalist – Somicom
  2. Alien (1979) – The Deeper Meaning You Missed – Jay Dyer – Jay's Analysis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: