By: Nick
I would hope that anyone reading the title of this post would consider the suggested question nothing short of blasphemy. For those who donât know, there are Christians who do give an affirmative answer to this question. While you might be thinking this is some fringe group, you will probably be shocked to find the groups who affirm this are Protestants of the Lutheran and Reformed (Calvinist) traditions.
The following quotes are from well respected Protestant teachers, going all the way back to Luther Himself:
âââââââââ
We should remember that Christâs suffering in His human nature, as He hung on the cross those six hours, was not primarily physical, but mental and spiritual. When He cried out, âMy God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me,â He was literally suffering the pangs of hell. For that is essentially what hell is, separation from God, separation from everything that is good and desirable. Such suffering is beyond our comprehension. But since He suffered as a divine-human person, His suffering was a just equivalent for all that His people would have suffered in an eternity in hell.
(Boettner, Loraine. âThe Reformed Faith.â Chapter 3.)
To [Jesus] was imputed the guilt of their sins, and He was suffering the punishment for those sins on their behalf. And the very essence of that punishment was the outpouring of Godâs wrath against sinners. In some mysterious way during those awful hours on the cross, the Father poured out the full measure of His wrath against sin, and the recipient of that wrath was Godâs own beloved Son.
In this lies the true meaning of the cross.
(MacArthur, John. âThe Murder of Jesus.â Page 219.)
Christ died in our place and in our stead â and He received the very same outpouring of divine wrath in all its fury that we deserved for our sin. It was a punishment so severe that a mortal could spend all eternity in the torments of hell, and still he would not have begun to exhaust the divine wrath that was heaped on Christ at the cross.
This was the true measure of Christâs sufferings on the cross. The physical pains of crucifixion â dreadful as they were â were nothing compared to the wrath of the Father against Him. The anticipation of this was what had caused Him to sweat blood in the garden. This is why He looked ahead to the cross with such horror. We cannot begin to fathom all that was involved in paying the price of our sin. Itâs sufficient to understand that all our worst fears about the horrors of hell â and more â were realized by Him as He received the due penalty of othersâ wrongdoing.
And in that awful, sacred hour, it was as if the Father abandoned Him. Though there was surely no interruption in the Fatherâs love for Him as a Son, God nonetheless turned away from Him and forsook Him as our substitute.
( Ibid., Page 220-221)
Nothing had been done if Christ had only endured corporeal death. In order to interpose between us and Godâs anger, and satisfy his righteous judgment, it was necessary that he should feel the weight of divine vengeance. Whence also it was necessary that he should engage, as it were, at close quarters with the powers of hell and the horrors of eternal death. ⊠⊠Hence there is nothing strange in its being said that he descended to hell, seeing he endured the death which is inflicted on the wicked by an angry God. It is frivolous and ridiculous to object that in this way the order is perverted, it being absurd that an event which preceded burial should be placed after it. But after explaining what Christ endured in the sight of man, the Creed appropriately adds the invisible and incomprehensible judgment which he endured before God, to teach us that not only was the body of Christ given up as the price of redemption, but that there was a greater and more excellent priceâthat he bore in his soul the tortures of condemned and ruined man. (Calvin, John. âInstitutes of the Christian Religion.â Book 3:Chapter 16.
The penalty of the divine law is said to be eternal death. Therefore if Christ suffered the penalty of the law He must have suffered death eternal; or, as others say, He must have endured the same kind of sufferings as those who are cast off from God and die eternally are called upon to suffer. (Hodge, Charles. âSystematic Theology.â Vol. 2, Part 3, Ch 6, Sec 3)
Luther: âChrist himself suffered the dread and horror of a distressed conscience that tasted eternal wrath;â âit was not a game, or a joke, or play-acting when he said, âThou hast forsaken meâ; for then he felt himself really forsaken in all things even as a sinner is forsakenâ (Werke, 5. 602, 605) (Packer, J.I. âThe Logic of Penal Substitution.â footnote 44)
So then, gaze at the heavenly picture of Christ, who descended into hell for your sake and was forsaken by God as one eternally damned when he spoke the words on the cross, âEli, Eli, lama sabachthani!â â âMy God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?â In that picture your hell is defeated and your uncertain election is made sure. (Luther, Martin. âTreatise on Preparing to Die.â)
The physical pain of the crucifixion and the [psychological] pain of taking on himself the absolute evil of our sins were aggravated by the fact that Jesus faced this pain alone. ⊠Yet more difficult than these three previous aspects of Jesusâ pain was the pain of bearing the wrath of God upon himself. As Jesus bore the guilt of our sins alone, God the Father, the mighty Creator, the Lord of the universe, poured out on Jesus the fury of his wrath: Jesus became the object of the intense hatred of sin and vengeance against sin that God had patiently stored up since the beginning of the world.(Grudem, Wayne. âBible Doctrine.â Page 253-254)
âWhat prevents us from seeing God is our heart. Our impurity. But Jesus had no impurity. And Thomas said He was pure in heart. So obviously He had some, some experience of the beauty of the Father. Until that moment that my sin was placed upon Him. And the one who was pure was pure no more. And God cursed Him. It was if there was a cry from Heaven â excuse my language but I can be no more accurate than to say â it was as if Jesus heard the words âGod damn youâ, because thatâs what it meant to be cursed, to be damned, to be under the anathema of the Father. As I said I donât understand that, but I know that itâs true.â (R.C. Sproul. Together for the Gospel. April 17, 2008. Louisville, KY. Session V â The Curse Motif of the Atonement. Minute 55:01)
âHell is all about echoing faintly the glory of Calvary. Thatâs the meaning of hell in this room right now. To help you feel in some emotional measure the magnificence of what Christ did for you when he bore not only your eternal suffering, but millions of peopleâs eternal suffering when His Father put our curse on Him. What a Saviour is echoed in the flames of hell. So thatâs what I mean when I say hell is an echo of the glory of God, and an echo of the Saviorâs sufferings, and therefore an echo of the infinite love of God for our souls.â (John Piper. Resolved Conference 2008. Session 8 â The Echo and Insufficiency of Hell. Min 40:00)
âThis moment in Mark chapter 15 [i.e. âMy God, my Godâ], it is this moment, it is what takes place in this moment that delivers us from hell. This agony, this scream, is what delivers all those who turn from their sin and trust in the Savior from hell. On the cross, Jesus experienced hell for us. He experienced hell for us, bearing Godâs wrath and eternal punishment. And because He did, Heaven awaits all those who turn from their sin and trust in Him. He screamed the âscream of the damnedâ [i.e., âforsaken meâ] for us. Listen, this scream should be our scream. ⊠This scream should be my eternal scream. He takes upon Himself my sin, the wrath I deserved for and against my sin, He screams the âscream of the damnedâ for me.â (C.J. Mahaney. Resolved Conference 2008. Session 11 â The Cry From the Cross. Min 46:35)
âThere are four ways that you can measure the love of God in Christ heard in the âscream of the damnedâ ⊠and all four of them are infinite, and they all point to the infinite value of the âscream of the damnedâ. Now itâs bigger than this, and the quote you just heard from âSpectacular Sinsâ is my effort to get at it. Hell exists, sin exists, Heaven exists, cross exists, everything exists to magnify the worth of the âscream of the damnedâ. Everything. Thatâs the point of the universe.â (John Piper. Resolved Conference 2008. Session 12 â The Triumph of the Gospel in the New Heavens and New Earth. Min 00:15)
The quotes are very clear, these famous Protestant pastors and theologians believe Jesus received the punishments which the sinner deserved, including both physical death and hellfire. They teach God the Father poured out His wrath on His Son Jesus, which means Jesus underwent the equivalent of hell and was effectively damned as a sinner is damned.
Why would someone affirm such a blasphemous teaching? What most donât know is that Jesus getting damned in our place is the heart of Sola Fide. Thatâs right, the doctrine of justification by faith alone requires this. Sola Fide teaches that by faith the sinner receives the righteousness of Christ, while acknowledging Christ received the punishment the sinner deserved. This teaching of Jesus getting damned in place of the sinner is popularly termed âPenal Substitution.â If this doctrine is false, then Sola Fide collapses. Martin Luther realized this, and all other Protestant theologians since then recognized this as well.
The root of the problem is the starting assumption that Sola Fide is true, because once that is assumed, whatever doctrines are necessary to hold up Sola Fide will have to be affirmed in turn. If this means the Father damned His Beloved Son, then (as we have unfortunately seen) there will be people who have little trouble believing this.
While we could spend time refuting this abomination from Scripture, our Christian consciences should be a sufficient guide in telling us something this outrageous and blasphemous cannot be true.
Pingback: The Cross: A Comparison â Classical Christianity