One of the most popular YouTube debates was between Matt Dillahunty and Jordan Peterson in 2018.  Last year we reviewed the Great Debate between Dr. Greg Bahnsen and Dr. Gordon Stein outlining the transcendental argument in classic form and in this debate, JBP came really close near the middle of the discussion of making a kind of transcendental argument.  Overall, like the debate with Zizek I analyzed, the debate had pros and cons, good points and bad arguments.  Since I debated Matt last year, we will compare my arguments to this debate.

 [spreaker type=player resource=”episode_id=42993630″ width=”100%” height=”200px” theme=”light” playlist=”false” playlist-continuous=”false” autoplay=”false” live-autoplay=”false” chapters-image=”true” episode-image-position=”right” hide-logo=”false” hide-likes=”false” hide-comments=”false” hide-sharing=”false” hide-download=”true”]

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis in the Purchase Membership section to access the archives of videos and interviews and lectures or purchase my books in the Shop! 

[crypto-donation-box]