Jay and Tristan cover the logical fallacies in Veganism and its “ethical” worldview, which is based on a lot of hot bbutt gas. Vegan ethics are without foundation and cannot be justified on its materialistic and naturalistic assumptions. This is the intro to the full stream that happened a few days later.
In the full stream, Jay and Tristan continue where the discussion left off, noting the numerous fallacies that underly the vegan worldview. Based on a strict and arbitrary approach, veganism is not a position based around health, but the notion of strict ethical standards, supposedly. But are these ethics based on anything that isn’t arbitrary or a restatement of endless logical fallacies? We will find out. We had connection issues throughout but we persevered.
One Response to Cult Vs. Logic: Who Wins? Jay Dyer / Tristan