This “debate” was a doozy, but the crux of the issue centered on whether logic and meta-ethics are related. It took two hours to get AskYourself to finally admit he thought we “should” accept logic. In other words, logic entails truth and that one *ought* to accept what is true. Simple error in the debate was their assumption that because you can speak of things as distinct in discourse, they are in actual fact really distinct. Took two hours for him to trip up and admit they aren’t. This ended up in classic Bloodsports territory. See my essay here on logic entailing ethics.

[spreaker type=player resource=”episode_id=16186435″ width=”100%” height=”200px” theme=”light” playlist=”false” playlist-continuous=”false” autoplay=”false” live-autoplay=”false” chapters-image=”true” episode-image-position=”right” hide-logo=”false” hide-likes=”false” hide-comments=”false” hide-sharing=”false” ]
 

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis in the Purchase Membership section to access the archives of videos and interviews and lectures or purchase my books in the Shop!