Cherry 2000 (1987): The Dystopic Simulacra is Here

cherry-2000

What a gorgeous VHS.

By: Jay Dyer

I remember when I was 14, there was only one VHS rental in the small town where I lived, and as a result, I think I rented every enjoyably bad post-apocalypse and sci-fi title.  When by age 15 we had moved to a larger city with even more strip mall VHS rental options, I had seen them all. The good news is, I didn’t see them all – there’s Cherry 2000 (1987).  Somehow this gem of the genre was stored away for me by the B movie angels for a later date.  The other neat-O aspect of Cherry 2000 is its prescience in terms of the social order – it’s set in 2017.  

As with most post-apocalyptic films, the devastation of what would be the early 21st century is generally off – most Americans aren’t dwelling in the slum remains of former cities, in underground catacombs or desert-born RV communities.  We don’t barter for Kool Cigarettes or scan rival tribes for nuclear fallout, rather, oil is plentiful and, as of yet, there are still Kool Cigarettes available at your local gas station.   Mad Max hasn’t happened yet, nor has Hell Come to Frogtown (we’re still fecund!), though we recently had a southern U.S. gas shortage that was a hint of what could be, should a manufactured crisis (and it would be manufactured) ever occur.

As for the film, several curious themes and symbols appear for JaysAnalysis purposes, so let us analyze.  The U.S. has fragmented into various “zones,” some wastelands, some metropolitan.  For the metropolitan and urban areas, the conditioning of the populace has been highly successful, resulting in mandatory mass recycling centers.  This aspect of the film is amazingly prescient, not because recycling was absent in the 80s, but rather the “green,” Agenda 21 style enforcement of the policies have become overtly tyrannical.  This aspect of the predictive prognostication is nearly accurate, as the globalists have capitalized on the ecological and environmentalist movements to promote both the nanny state and depopulation (through a manufactured “green” “revolution”).  

Hang around Glu Glu and you might catch a glimpse of Laurence Fishburn.

Hang around Glu Glu and you might catch a glimpse of Laurence Fishbone.

Besides the hyper-focus on supposed environmental issues, the dystopic future cosmopolis is also hyper-sexualized, turning this outlet towards sexbots.  Achieving a normative status, sexbots are commonplace as designer mates are chosen for those who can afford it, while in the underground actual sexual contact is a black market commodity (through a kind of state-sanctioned prostitution requiring contracts).  Sam’s bros talk him into visiting the real sex club titled “Glu Glu Club,” which i speculate symbolizes the now-absent “glue” of society – love, in both its eros and agape senses, the “glue” of society embodied in the bond of man and woman is now almost absent.  The club’s sign is also situated within the eyeball/target imagery, a prominent recurring image in the film, especially when seen in concert with the overt Egyptian themes in the climax.   Sexbots, in fact, are now here

Film Fresh Fishburne

Fila Fresh Fishburne

Filled with ziggurats, pyramids and giant towers to technological prowess, the “civilized” metropolis is shown to be a palace of vapid pleasures, and in an interesting twist of irony will constitute the real wasteland. Executive Sam Treadwell’s seemingly idyllic life is thrown into chaos as his iWife Cherry 2000 short circuits following a romp on a suds-filled kitchen floor.  The contrast of man’s technological simplicity and ease with his lack of emotional fulfillment is an appropriate paradox for our world of technihilism, and will only continue as sexbots become more and more commonplace.  

Holes.

Holes.

Discovering his specific model of Cherry is quite rare, Sam embarks on a journey into “Zone 7” where they are housed, a wasteland befitting any post-apocalyptic B movie, populated by roving gangs of sadistic wild-men, a bizarre cult and hermetic loners.  Sam, convinced that Cherry is the ideal, archetypal woman hires “E” – Edith Johnson (Melanie Griffith) to be his “tracker,” or guide through the wastelands.  Immediately apparent is the film’s constant and clever use of irony, with Edith being the true “cherry” (with her vibrant red hair) Sam is seeking, yet Sam’s psychological process through the hero’s quest is still incomplete.

Oddly placed pyramid guides Sam on his quest.

Oddly placed pyramid guides Sam on his quest.

Oddly, and keeping with the eyeball/target/hole theme, as Sam enters the outskirts of the wasteland to hire Edith, he stays at the “Gloryhole Hotel” (if you aren’t aware of what that is, don’t worry about it, but it recalls the consistent theme of the target-eye-hole imagery throughout, suggesting an association extending back to both Crowley and ancient Egypt.  In my view, the usage of this triad symbol suggests: First, the control of the masses in the megalopolis through the top of the pyramidal structure, the eye, or the corporate/banking elite as it appears on the US dollar.  “Oh, how superior is the Eye of Horus (anus) to the Mouth of Isis (vagina)!” – Aleister Crowley, whose sodomite practices are part and parcel of the barrenness of sterility that results from the prevalence of sodomy, just as the hyper-sexualized society in the film rarely engage in vaginal intercourse.  As a side note, the film does not show actual sex and nudity.

Down the film's many holes...

Down the film’s many holes…

On a deeper level, the eye is symbolic of many things, including divine providence, the higher faculties in man (the mind’s eye), Lucifer, and, of course, the anus.  The symbol is thus polyvalent and determined based on its context.  For Sam, his continual encounter with target-hole-eye symbolism suggests his control by his desires, seeking fulfillment in the ideal “hole” of the perfect feminine.    Thus, I posit at the heart of Cherry 2000 is an alchemico-psychical journey of Sam, the future man, and his quest to overcome simulacrum, the synthetica of his artificial environment of technological ease and virtual phantasm fulfillment.  Like inhabitants of Plato’s cave, the corporate city-dwelling man of the future is surrounded by the artifices of man’s ingenuity, not for the freedom he believes he possesses, but for his enslavement.  

Lester's cult bullseyes a sacrifice.

Lester’s cult bullseyes a sacrifice.

Crossing the wasteland, Sam and E encounter the common motif of the hero’s quest, the descent underground, shown in classic examples of Odysseus in The Odyssey, Aeneas in The Aeneid and Dante in The Inferno, or even the katabasis of Christ’s descent into Hades.  The wasteland zone also includes the “graveyard,” indicating a process of intense travail and testing, or something akin to a dark night of the soul or a “crossing of the abyss.”  Here he encounters the film’s protagonist, Lester, who runs a kitschy, googie architecture style cult called Sky Ranch.  Lester runs his cult like a tyrannical patriarch, commanding his concubines (?) and wife to “make sandwiches” and obey his pettiest whims, while the most humiliating fact is that Lester’s chief broad is Sam’s ex-girlfriend (who apparently left Sam for Lester years prior).   Thus, the usage of the 50s atomic, googie aesthetics is associated with the 50s-era nuclear “family unit” and the supposed tyranny of the Leave it to Beaver father-figure.

Googie compound.

Google style “Sky Ranch” cult compound.

Here we can sense traces of feminism, which in an otherwise enjoyable B movie gives a bit of nausea.  The message seems to be all older forms of social order are no longer applicable or useful, where Lester’s patriarchal cult is set in contrast to the egalitarian sex-obsession of the mega-city.  Indeed, Cherry is a strong, independent woman who feels she doesn’t need a man, until (as can be expected), she and Sam gradually fall in love.   Perhaps in this sense the feminist aspects of the film can be redeemed and canceled out: Both Sam and E discover they need each other.  In this case, it’s the old Egyptian magic of manipulating sexual energy.  

Sam’s obsession with Cherry’s hand-held  “memory disc” is almost a perfect parallel to today’s iPhone-obsessed populace, with Sam risking life and limb to recover Cherry’s RAM and voice recordings.  The irony once again is that Sam is willing to sacrifice everything for something that isn’t real, when what he is seeking is right before him (of course, paradoxically he never would have met Edith without his Cherry quest, so perhaps modern man’s futile quest to achieve satiety through phantasms will lead him to the truth of their lie – very Baudrillardian).

Sexbot Cherry 2000

Sexbot Cherry 2000

Persons are also often contrasted with the theme of toasters, or bodies, as if the bots are mere toasters, while the humans are persons who possess souls.  This is crucial in the film’s philosophy and for our purposes, since modern man has had the belief in the soul intentionally stamped out of him, as Bertrand Russell said would occur.   Russell said belief in free will and the soul would have to be crushed through an eternal boot on the face of all resistance, to create the world envisioned by the technocrats, where depopulation and a mindless drone population could be corralled into monotonous Brave New World-style delta and epsilon work.   

Finally reaching the ruins of Vegas (the location of Zone 7), and specifically an old Pharaoh’s Casino, Sam finds a working model Cherry 2000 housed like a hidden mystical treasure.  The Vegas imagery is important, as well as the Egyptian symbolism, as Vegas is a modern simulacrum of ancient empires.  If you’ve visited, you see my point – an adult Disneyland of all vices, a sensory overload empire in the desert that even erects synthetic pyramids, temples and Roman palaces and coliseums.   

The serpents of Pharoah.

The serpents of Pharoah.

Vegas is a simulation for the control man through his passions, and in Cherry 2000 the symbolism of the eye-target-hole comes full circle, as the idolatrous imperial elites of old beguiled man with the same trickery of today (those atop the social pyramid), only now it is infinitely more sophisticated and scientifically precise.   Until man (and especially modern man) learns the Satanic symbol of the simulation is the stamping out of his own soul, he will forever be locked in the maze of his own shadows of the cave wall.  The capturing of man’s eye of the mind is the control of his imagination, his hopes and dreams according to Gregory Bateson, and in our day the false Gospel of man’s “liberation” is the creation of an artificial intelligence, a cyborg-slash-android bot to fulfill his desires.  The arrival of A.I. and the sex bot, however, does not exemplify man’s freedom and technological prowess, but the end of man, and the designers and architects of those bots are the social engineers and technocrats who surround the eye – the same eye of egypt, the eye of Lucifer who persistently cons man through his imaginal realm, his mind’s eye, his dreams, where man seeks his meaning and destiny.  Socrates should have played Cherry 2000 on the wall for his cave-dwelling compatriots.  

patreon-become-my-patron

follow_twitterFollow_us_on_Facebookyoutube-subscribe-button-psd-photoshop-july-2013

To support my work, become a member at JaysAnalysis for 4.95 a month, or 60.00 a year, for my full talks and interviews, as well as purchasing my book, Esoteric Hollywood at the links at the site.

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

Subscribe to JaysAnalysis for more by clicking on this image!

JaysAnalysis Podcast now on iTunes! Click the image.  JaysAnalysis offers the first hour for free and the full talks and interviews as a subscription below.

For full talks and lectures, subscribe to JaysAnalysis on PayPal here.

Purchase my book, Esoteric Hollywood by clicking the image!

JaysAnalysis on Stitcher:

stitcher-banner-300x250

 

Order Hollywood Mind Control by Jamie Hanshaw here!

 

7 Comments on Cherry 2000 (1987): The Dystopic Simulacra is Here

  1. It has been observed that Western civilization was born out of the synthesis of three cities: Athens, Rome and Jerusalem, Surveying the current cultural landscape, the West is now a reflection Hollywood, Las Vegas, and possibly New York City or Disneyland or Silicon Valley. As the American Empire enters its twilight years, simulacra becomes more important to the ruling class. This is why every day, society more and more resembles an amusement park. The masses need to be kept continually amused and confused. Perhaps the cultural and moral degradation we see all around us was inevitable. As you and a few others have correctly pointed out, America’s descent into consumerism and tyranny is not a result of an alienation from her founding principles but rather is the culmination of the Enlightenment ideas that gave birth to her; In any event, America is still a very godly nation. Unfortunately, that god is Mammon. Great article!

  2. Interesting review. As usual there’s tons of things I didn’t notice when I saw the film many years ago, but I wasn’t watching with a critical eye.

    You wrote: Vegas is a simulation for the control man through his passions, and in Cherry 2000 the symbolism of the eye-target-hole comes full circle, as the idolatrous imperial elites of old beguiled man with the same trickery of today (those atop the social pyramid), only now it is infinitely more sophisticated and scientifically precise. Until man (and especially modern man) learns the Satanic symbol of the simulation is the stamping out of his own soul, he will forever be locked in the maze of his own shadows of the cave wall.
    Well said

    IMO recently this is done under the neoliberal rubric of “[insert catch phrase] freedom/equality” such as recent catch phrases of reproductive freedom and marriage equality–which if examined critically are actually slavery to passions and embracing the desires of would be oppressors, maybe we’ll soon see the “freedom” to screw sexbots promoted.

    Orwell’s ‘freedom is slavery’ was a hard, oppressive, totalitarian vision akin to the USSR, the Atlantacist version is a subversive Huxleyesque vision where people embrace the enslavement.
    Or as Boethius said in Consolation of Philosophy:
    …by yielding to these passions and consenting to them, men increase the slavery which they have brought upon themselves, and their true liberty is lost in captivity.

    The modern silence of the Catholic Church over these issues is remarkable in light of writings such as Pius XII’s Encyclical Miranda Prorsus, on mass communications written in 1957:
    17. The remarkable progress made by modern technology in the fields of motion pictures, radio, and television have given rise to great benefits, and to just as great dangers. For these new means of communication are within the reach of almost everyone, and thus exercise a powerful influence over men’s minds. They can enlighten, ennoble, and adorn men’s minds, but they can also disfigure them with dark shadows, disgrace them with perversity, and expose them to unrestrained passions, according as the shows they offer present our senses with objects that are proper or improper.

    I’m 99% sure you read this when you were attending traditional Catholic Masses. Just compare the brevity and clarity of older encyclicals to the verbose, meandering, vague writing style of the modern papacies. This stuff gets buried and Agenda 21 & NWO environmentalism is now promoted.

  3. Also, have you seen the 2002 film Cypher?
    imdb link – http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0284978/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

    Tons of stuff with corporate entrainment technology (ala Catherine Austin Fitts writing), hypnosis via VR goggles and covert drugging of employees for espionage purposes. Not a B movie, but not a blockbuster either.

  4. I wonder if having sex with a robot will be considered legitimate in the future? If so then you could plausably say that a high percentage of western teenage boys have actually lost their virginity to a sock.

  5. Simulacra is plural. But I’m nitpicking. Good essay.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: