Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism

Clownish theatrics by Pussy Riot.
Clownish theatrics by Pussy Riot.

Clownish theatrics by Pussy Riot.

By: Jay Dyer

I’ve received several messages from feminists of late inquiring as to why on earth I would dare to question women’s rights, supposed equality and empowerment.  Having written a past article on the Satanic nature of feminism, the operant assumption by these questioners is of course guided by the official narrative of history as one of patriarchal oppression, wherein only in the last few centuries has the “tyranny” of old white men been exposed in the vast conspiracy theory known as gender.  Of course none of this is true, but I thought it appropriate to answer these charges and explain the real nature of feminism as a social engineering plot to re-organize and re-engineer mankind by the technocrats.

To understand this, we must see the real players behind “women’s liberation,” dating roughly from the period of the Enlightenment and French Revolution, up to the Paris Commune and in the last century allying with Marxism and socialism to form a global front against the long domination of evil, stupid, and tyrannical men.  As is often the case, the real history and power behind these revolutionary causes was oligarchical and subversive, not at all concerned with the interests of woman in general, but in deconstructing western society at the hands of moneyed elites.

While this sounds counter-intuitive, it is a fact that almost all so-called “liberal” movements have been funded, co-opted, used and harnessed by the money power as a means of psychological warfare for the destruction of the existing order.  Feminism is no exception to this, and like Marxism, had the backing of powerful financial interests which could utilize the “liberation” by appealing to the deluded and naïve ignorance of youth, as the world witnesses with Mao’s cultural revolution.

Thus, just as the banking elite funded revolutionaries in Russia and China to destabilize the existing regimes, so with feminism and “women’s liberation,” the destabilization of the masses could be more easily accomplished, not just through altering social structures, but also through attacking gender.  The attack on gender is a long, scientific process that began with women’s liberation and has now consummated in the synthetic rewrite of all nature.  Along this long, technocratic and scientistic path the oligarchs reasoned that the inversion of all existing orders through subversion would result in the socialistic Brave New World of enforced androgyny – the feminization of men, and the masculinization of women.

The Masonic revolutionary Declaration of the Rights of Man.

The Masonic revolutionary Declaration of the Rights of Man.

At the time of the Enlightenment, Mary Wollstonecraft had spoken out as an early proponent of “women’s rights,” with her Vindication of the Rights of Women, published in 1792.  From there, and with the radicals of the later Paris Commune, the so-called liberation was one in which the toppling of the monarchies gave rise to socialism and republicanism.  It is important to recall that Weishaupt’s illuminism was communism, and the liberte, egalite, fraternite that was revered amongst the illuminist Jacobins and revolutionaries found their natural complement in women’s liberation. We can therefore see parallels in the Masonic Declaration of the Rights of Man with treatises like Wollstonecraft.  The same radical egalitarianism of Paris communism would manifest in Bolshevik and Soviet propaganda, as women were told to cast off the slavery of domesticity for masculine occupations.

Fast forward to the last century, and we find the same strategy: Rockefeller daughter Abby was instrumental in establishing Cell 16, a radical feminist group advocating celibacy and the end of all traditional gender roles.  Abby and Cell 16 organized some of the first feminist conferences that would prove to become influential in “Third Wave Feminism’s” strategies for attacking the West.  Collier and Horowitz’s authorized biography of the Rockefellers presents Abby as somewhat of a rebel against the family’s capitalist veneer, but as we will see, this is not exactly accurate.  Collier and Horowitz write:

David Rockefeller's 1973 NYT article praising Mao. Click to enlarge.

David Rockefeller’s 1973 NYT article praising Mao. Click to enlarge.

Late in 1968, she [Abby] was visited by a different kind of supplicant.  It was Roxanne Dunbar, and she was requesting funds to send a delegate to a forthcoming feminist conference in Chicago, the first major gathering of its kind.  Together with Dana Densmore, Betsy Warrior, and a few other harbingers of the new women’s movement, Roxanne had already founded and put out the inaugural issue of The Journal of Female Liberation. ..

‘I’d considered myself a feminist all my life, although I never would have used that word, because I hated anything involving the word ‘female.’  Not a case of self-loathing, just the realization that there was nothing in what I had been given as a woman to like.  All the associations were repellent to me.  All ‘feminine’ mannerisms – making oneself up, wearing clothes men designed, acting the way men had designed – seemed to be a set up to make women contemptible to men, so that men could hate them.’…

With Roxanne and the others, Abby started Cell 16, soon of the premier feminist organizations.” (The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty, 599-600.)

We are told, of course, that Abby was the black sheep of the family, and her Marxism and feminism were in direct opposition to the family, yet when we consider the support of the Rockefeller Foundation for various projects, we find they have been no stranger to feminist causes.  In fact, David Rockefeller famously praised Maoist China in his 1973 New York Times editorial, as seen below.  Even today, the Rockefeller Foundation projects involve the funding of numerous women’s liberation projects, all under the guise of populism (and here, and here, for example).  Ironically, populism is something David Rockefeller derides in his Memoirs:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (“Proud Internationalist,” Memoirs, pg. 405)

Another stunning example of this strategic subversion is the use of radical feminists like Pussy Riot or Femen by NGOs funded by George Soros.  In the case of Soros and U.S. State Department NGOs, these radical left movements have the goal of being a social and psychologically destabilizing factor.  Indeed, these clownish groups exist for their aesthetic terrorism, all with the backing of billionaires to cause dissent against Putin and Eurasia.  Certainly other means are used, as Soros had bragged about funding the Crimean crisis through color revolutions.  Kurt Nimmo explains:

You go gurl!!!!

You go gurl!!!!

“George Soros told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria over the weekend he is responsible for establishing a foundation in Ukraine that ultimately contributed to the overthrow of the country’s elected leader and the installation of a junta handpicked by the State Department.

“First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?” Zakaria asked Soros.

“Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now,” Soros responded.”

In like manner, Hollywood director Aaron Russo met with Nicholas Rockefeller and reported in an interview that Nicholas informed him of the true nature of feminism and why it was funded by the elites.  The crux of the matter is, feminism and so-called “liberation” is useful to billionaire technocrats to reorganize society – it has nothing to do with liberation or freedom, but enslavement to the passions and ultimately, death through dysgenics and dying reproduction rates. The explanation is best given in Russo’s own words, especially when we recall Gloria Steinem’s own admission that feminism via Ms. Magazine was funded by the CIA:



22 Comments on Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism

  1. Okay. This essay persuades THAT the oligarchs are behind feminism. But I’d like to see more on WHY. E.g., WHY did the CIA help bankroll Ms. Magazine. WHAT do they get out of it? What do the oligarchs in general get out of it? I can see what the Tribe gets out of it, but that’s different than oligarchs in general. (In the Tribe’s case, it’s pure ethnic warfare and an ethnic power grab — so that makes sense.)

    • Just to totally mess up your opponent. Feminism results in the loss of family.

      • straight shooter // March 6, 2015 at 7:26 am //

        Social destabilization of both the family unit and the male-female dynamic, PLUS added income to the tax base produced from women entering the work force. Pretty diabolical.

    • The is one more element of the Fabian Society/Milner Round Table/Cultural Marxist fifth column strategy falling into place, warfare on every side and in every aspect of life. In this case it’s the war against the family and disgenic tactics. That’s their avowed goal, that’s what the Fabian society is about and how they get their name. They are maybe not so popular or even active anymore (I don’t really know for certain), but it’s the same game plan, and I think that the Fabian group might have been the anointed spirit or zeitgeist of the over all movement of sorts. Divide and conquer. Divide and conquer art, culture, music, gender relations, class (a favorite one from the days of old) and divide even us among ourselves, inside and out until we no longer know who we are as people. This is one among a set of varied but similar tactics in the war against you and the individual mind. Karen Straughan and others are exposing this garbage right now over at Honey Badger Radio, Own your Shit blog, various MRM forums and other venues. The latest targets have been the game geek world and or subcultures, the tech industry, STEM fields in schools and universities and anything else that can be grabbed onto as a new target of opportunity.

    • You should check out E. Michael Jones’ “Libido Dominandi”. He tries to demonstrate that sexual liberation is a form of social control by following the sexual revolution for over 200 years. From memory, their were interesting sections on the Illuminati, the French Revolution, Percy Shelly, Freud, John B. Watson, Alexandra Kollontai, the Harlem Rennaisance, Kerouac, John D. Rockefeller III, Kinsey, and Paul Blanshard. You will learn something.

      • I’m reading Jones’ book now. His treatment of Illuminism and its relation to Freudian psychotherapy is interesting. According to Jones both are scams designed to deny the victim his free will and money respectively.

      • Kimberly // April 28, 2015 at 2:27 am //

        E. Michael Jones was interviewed on Red Ice on March 30th, 2015 in support of this book.

    • It’s a divide-and-conquer tactic. When one realizes that 2% of the population owns 90% of the country’s wealth, one can readily imagine that the LAST thing those 2% want is for the 98% to get together and go after THEM. Don’t think feminism is about $$? How badly off do you suppose the women in that 2% are?

  2. The loss of family (aka patriarchy) leads to greater dependence on the State. And the oligarchs control the State. Feminism contributes to lower birthrates so it’s also serves the Rockefeller population control agenda. Rockefeller largess also funded Margaret Sanger’s operation,as well as the work of the pederast sex researcher Alfred Kinsey.

  3. Michael Sean // February 22, 2015 at 1:49 am // Reply

    I think that with the current Hollywood trend to deconstruct everything into a feminists nightmare (think New Ghostbusters, and Maleficient), that it’s high time Universal got in on the act with their monsters. I can see it now; Wolfwoman (here me howl), and Gloria Frankensteinem’s monster. Exciting times ahead…..

    • I heard about the new Ghostbusters. I’m sure it will be a box office failure but much of Hollywood, like the news media, is a loss lead for the ruling elite.They are more interested in cultural warfare than money. Heck, they create the money. That’s why they built universities and established foundations. Misanthropy disguised as philanthropy (a wolf in sheep’s clothing). Oh how Fabian!

      Jay has talked about the weird feminist message in many of the commercials during the Super Bowl. Did you catch the one about tax preparation that featured reenacted Revolutionary War scenes? If you did,there was scene that had a young woman bayonetting a British soldier in battle. Now how many women served in the Continental Army much less fought on the front lines? More feminist mind control BS.

  4. C. MacBrádaigh // February 22, 2015 at 4:00 am // Reply

    Reblogged this on cén fáth arís and commented:
    Excellent article on the roots and goals of feminism

  5. I don’t have a opinion about Feminism but the Femen group is totally repulsive.

    Wall Street and London Bankers financed the Bolshevik Revolution almost one hundred years ago, they did that because they’re the same “Tribe”, the same “Chosen People” and they’re totally determinated to make themselves the Kings of this World.

    • Right you are. The plan was published 100 years ago in 24 chapters. Not that I believe it at face value – it’s obviously a ruse, not really authored by its alleged architects, and certainly not in that pompous tone. But the sheer profundity of knowledge into the human condition proves undeniably one thing: because that kind of insight can only be acquired over centuries of study, it is proof positive of an ongoing purposeful plan to take over the planet. Even if it was fiction, and sold to the public as such, the astute reader would immediately understand that the power behind that concoction is very real.

      But you see, it is their right to do this, and I can prove this very quickly:
      1. Either they accomplish their purpose AND manage to hold it permanently – in this case their consciousness proves itself inherently right by virtue of its dominion over the previous order of things
      2. Or they fall, and are proven wrong, which still doesn’t actually show that it is not their right to do this for the time being

      The flipside of all this is that just as it is their right to do this, it is our right to choose how to live our lives. You see, they prefer you don’t know about the plan. But if you do, they prefer you point to them as the problem. That way, you won’t look at yourself and effectuate the kind of change that can actually make an impact in the world.

      • timetowakeupamerica // February 18, 2016 at 4:04 am //

        datasentinel, you said: “The flipside of all this is that just as it is their right to do this, it is our right to choose how to live our lives. You see, they prefer you don’t know about the plan. But if you do, they prefer you point to them as the problem. That way, you won’t look at yourself and effectuate the kind of change that can actually make an impact in the world.”

        Very profound. “Be the change you wish to see in the world.”

        I’d say – Empower YOURSELF and those closest to you. Stop feeding the Beast (System).

      • You’re on the money with your conclusion datasentinel. However, I believe you’re off the mark with your proof about it being their right to do this…

        Let’s consider for a moment, that it’s not so much their right to do this, as their role, as suggested by Shakespeare’s line about “All the world’s a stage, and we are but players upon it.”

        In any good story, it’s essential to have a thoroughly evil villain to contrast with the heroes, so let’s consider that these villains are simply playing their part in a play that we’ve previously agreed will give us the right conditions with which we can express aspects of our divinity, or virtue.

        So, the only difference is having an understanding that the bad guys are really only playing their role so convincingly so we can shine in ours. Then let’s consider that they’re like us, only higher grade actors, and they are still subject to the universal law of karma, so they will have to work off all the bad karma they’ve attracted in this incarnation as Oligarchs, Khazarian Mafia, etc, and they’re only doing it because they love us.

        This understanding would make the biblical exhortation to “Love thine enemy”, a little easier to accept, don’t you think?

        The key is that once we all see through the game, and recognize them as our allies in this game, then the game is up. Fortunately, that ain’t gonna happen anytime soon, no matter how hard we try. So, your solution is spot on. We are human beings, and whether we BE divinely human, or devilishly human, the choice is ours.

        Such is life.

        timetowakeup is right on with his comment about feeding the beast. There are far too many playing their game without realizing they are feeding the beast that is intent on destroying them. The least we could aspire to do is to stop feeding them through our ignorance.

  6. Feminism breaks down the relationships between males and females. I see so many young people of opposite sex who don’t know how to talk to one another. As such they take on the traits and personalities of the these built up characters they’ve seen driven by media and empowerment doctrine. Actors playing the roles that the puppeteers have set for them at the top behaving exactly how they want the population to interact. Very clever and insidious social manipulation tactics.

    A generation of lonley souls broken and unwilling to have a common goal of family to bond them and unite to fight for something they belive in.

  7. Co-option by elites is the main reason why feminism went off the rails. I mean does anyone really want to go back to a world where women had no education, no rights and were chattel to some men who were abusive?

    However it is not only the notions of militant feminism that drive men and women apart. The male and female drives are always opposed to one another. It is up to well socialized men and women to overcome these biological differences and find common ground. Of course our culture is wholly built on sowing distrust and paranoia between the sexes. Yes, I’ve seen feminists “hate” men. But I’ve also seen hatred and disgust for women by men. And this hatred by both sexes is viewed as good. Each side requires the other to bend a little more, to atone for sins that are, for the most part, completely illusionary.

    How do we overcome this false cultural trap is the question. Especially since most aren’t aware that they are echoing propaganda. How do you overcome this? How do men find common ground with women if they hold the false notion that every woman is after his money, claim false pregnancy and demand marriage? How do women fight the notion that they are abused by everything and every man?

23 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Why billionaire oligarchs bankroll feminism | Nobola
  2. Why billionaire oligarchs bankroll feminism | PushBack
  3. Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism | Jay’s Analysis | zaidpub
  4. Why billionaire oligarchs bankroll feminism | WebInvestigatorKK
  5. El por qué los oligarcas billonarios financian al feminismo | Crónicas Subterráneas
  6. Is Matriotism The Future of The Divine Feminine? « The Culture of Awareness
  7. Is Matriotism The Future of The Divine Feminine? - Waking Times : Waking Times
  8. Is Matriotism The Future of The Divine Feminine? - Give Back Our Freedom
  10. Links 172 | Cindy's Zone 2
  11. Shameless Hussies: A Study in Social Construction with an ISIS Cameo by Dr. Omar | zaidpub
  12. Rise of the Demotic Freak Cult | Jay's Analysis
  13. Rise of the Demotic Freak Cult | 2012 The Awakening
  14. The Canadian Family Law Industrial Complex | I,Hypocrite
  15. Multiculturalism: America’s Destruction II | Economic & Multicultural Terrorism
  16. Gloria Steinem And The CIA Connection (Feminism Part 2) - Trip's End of the World Blog
  17. Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism – Shift Frequency
  18. Women’s Lib is a Psy Op – Now What? | The Cosmic Lunch Lady
  19. Women’s Lib is a Psy Op – Now What? | The Cosmic Lunch Lady
  20. Nebulous Concepts, Rebuttable Presumption and The Canadian Family Law Industrial Complex – I,Hypocrite
  21. Today,s Thought
  22. El por qué los oligarcas billonarios financian al feminismo | Crónicas Subterráneas
  23. Let’s Distinguish Between Sexual Assault & Bad Behavior | True News Global

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: