Further bad news I must bear is that the global agenda has been streamlined, as you can extrapolate from the speakers that frequent TED, as well as the public goals of other “top players” he mentions. The speaker even says it’s “not a conspiracy,” yet we know it is: we have more credibility than he does, since we’ve been singing this tune for years! The stated agenda of the corporate green elite is the plan to kill 80-95% of the population over the next several decades. But there is a crucial card they must play on that road: in order to get there, the present “capitalist” system must implode. I have written elsewhere how the system feeds off of its own contrived crises, and in order for a global phoenix to rise from the ashes, the global economic order must crash. “Psshha!” you say. ‘These corporations stand to make too much money. They’d never collapse their own system.” Foolish sheeple, the name of the game is not “money.” The “money” is all based on a centralized fiat model of fractional reserve banking: it’s not real. And before you brush aside my claim that imploding their own system to create a new order out of the chaos as far-fetched, recall 9/11. And after you recall 9/11, which was a sort of prelude to the coming era, consider entities like Enron, or the BCCI, which served the elite purposes, and then were imploded. If you create the money, it’s no loss to your holdings to loot and plunder one of your fronts.
No, no, dear reader, the name of the game is death, not dollars. Megadeath, and I don’t mean the metal band. Depopulation is the name of the game, and that will be accomplished after the present order has been demolished. When it is demolished, there will be even further regimented depopulation, with the goal of eventually achieving “sustainability,” which is the fraudulent “Green” term for basically no one existing. The system tells you humans are a cancer. The scientific socialist establishment that works for the “TNCs” will (in their minds) wipe out the false social constructs of “nations,” establishing their elite global republic without the masses. But that is a good ways down the road: in the meantime, fraud and corruption must run rampant, while all existing traditional orders (family, state, classical education, religion, etc.) are to be demolished through that corruption, social engineering, mass media, psy ops, infiltration and internal factionalism.
The green movement has even made its way into all the mainline religions–nevermind that its marching army is a bunch of former communists and Soviets, all marching to the tune of their corporate sponsors, with a horde of tree-huggers and hipsters at the bottom of the pyramid that can’t figure out what gender they want to be. The religions are now on board with saving “mother earth,” when the corporate elite who run the green movement are actively engaged in bio and geo-engineering that is literally poisoning the planet. Maybe the SmartCity will even choose your gender for you, if you’re allowed to be born and not determined to be guilty of pre-crime, as the loving CEO of IBM has planned for you.
Yet while you’re worried about your 401k and your petty football game, Megadeath is fast approaching. Where will the cheerleaders be, then? Will we still get our cappuccinos in green-friendly totes? Dollars are old school, given that the implementation of the Internet was all along designed to move the world to a cashless control grid. And you thought Bitcoin would save you. I always ask hopeful innerwebz capitalists if they think DARPA and the Pentagon “gave” the world the Internet just because they’re nice guys. This question has not occurred to a lot of people: why was the Internet suddenly “given” to the world? Julian Assange was right when he explained that the Internet itself *is* a huge spying and surveillance grid. It was given to the masses for a reason: entrapment in that web, like a spider entraps its prey. I must bear even more bad news: Innerwebz was given to track and trace and store everything. Everything. As a side note, the lecture focuses on systems analysis, as did the IBM CEO’s lecture I linked. This is relevant because knowing how complex systems work means those at the top of the system can figure out how to trigger systemic collapse through identifying the weak points in the system. See also my talk on the philosophy of systems analysis here.
While you watch your Pentagon-run news for idiots, you are being soft-killed
So, the system is not your friend, and it will not protect you or fix things, as society implodes. You’ll have plenty of pills to numb you and screens to stare at, but no future and your progeny are the real targets. And before you call me a Marxist or an anarchist or a liberal, dear baby boomer reader, remind yourself of what Quigley says, down under. Down under this sentence, that is. Carroll Quigley. You see, all this is why Dr. Carroll Quigley wrote in his famous Tragedy and Hope decades ago that the world system actually works in a covert banking fashion, far predating this TED talk pseudo-elitist:
“The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole… Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money…” -Ibid., pg. 324
“It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges. Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates. In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).”
“In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.” -Ibid, 48-9