On Evil, Intrigue and the Left

Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

By: Jay It is often the case that detractors, opponents and skeptics will themselves latch onto a catchphrase or cliché statement about "how the world really works" in order to debunk the claims of anyone who challenges the mainstream account of events.  For them, "conspiracy theorists" will read everything as a conspiracy.  Ironically, the forebears of modern leftists were themselves the ones who asked questions about the status quo of their day, but as one learns in the study of paradigms and worldviews, the new opinions become the new dogmas.  As Foucault correctly explained, the modern world did not rid itself of hierarchy, "shepherds" and authority: it merely exchanged the old ones for a new. Not all truths are to be told to all men, and not all people are sufficiently mature to deal with the harsh realities of realpolitik.  The fact remains that men are easily duped and fooled.  The system knows this, and thus statecraft is based largely on psychology and social engineering.  Guided by pragmatism, this idea is ancient, but Machiavelli is a great example.  For Machiavelli, statecraft was precisely the ability to manage intrigue.  And the reality is, it is much more this than ideology that guides men and nations.  In his Art of War, Machiavelli writes of the corruption of the military industrial complex of his day: "But because military institutions have become completely corrupt and far removed from the ancient ways, these sinister opinions have arisen which make the military hated and intercourse with those who train them avoided. And I, judging, by what I have seen and read, that it is not impossible to restore its ancient ways and return some form of past virtue to it, have decided not to let this leisure time of mine pass without doing something, to write what I know of the art of war, to the satisfaction of those who are lovers of the ancient deeds. And although it requires courage to treat of those matters of which others have made a profession, none the less, I do not believe that it is a mistake to occupy a position with words, which may, with greater presumption, have been occupied with deeds; for the errors which I should make in writing can be corrected without injury to anyone, but those which are made with deeds cannot be found out except by the ruin of the Commanders."

Even Machiavelli longed for an earlier age of purportedly more virtuous warfare.  Perhaps this was his Atlantean/Platonic fantasy.  In our day, the military industrial complex is corrupt, but for the left to say that the “military industrial complex” is the source of American evil misses the point, as well as most leftist views of evil.  For the modern herd-minded hipster horde of “leftists,” the only “conspiracy” is that of the few fringe “extremists” who haven’t joined Obama and the modern, enlightened world of “social democracy.”  For the modern authoritarian left, the source of “evil” (if there is such a thing) is found in institutions and structure (except for the modern global government being erected!).  For them, wealth, success, growth, knowledge, life and existence are themselves evil.  Evil is located within the very being of created reality, and for the “leftists” who turn to Buddhism and Eastern philosophy (as the trendies do), evil is located in particularity.  Particulars is being used here in the philosophical sense: individuality, particularity, and singular objects, distinguished from others.  This is a classic notion of Eastern philosophies, which tends to focus on holism.

The World is Not Enough.

The World is Not Enough.

But is this the case?  Is it true that particular things are “bad”?  Is “evil” a result of distinguishing things, as well as gradations in things?   The solution given in this worldview is a move towards a radical holism – monism.  Monism is the philosophical view that all reality is one thing.  Historically, there have been monists who saw all reality as an idea (solipsists), others who saw reality as a manifestation of the One (Platonism), or even materialists and atomists, seeing all reality as purely “atoms.”  For these worldviews, distinction and difference are in some form an illusion or an ontologically dubious category that must in some way be overcome.

The all-encompassing One is beyond all distinction and classification and not capable of any real relation to any thing.  Given that presupposition, the manifestation of this world and its beauties and tragedies are to be transcended through some negation of their real existence or meditation, etc.  One can now see why this consciously anti-rational view would be entertained by the modern left.  While the desire to see reality holistically and all things related in a grand narrative found here is right – that is the direction in which we should go – this view and the modern left desires to encompass all reality in the impersonal One in a different grand narrative and design.  This grand narrative or great plan uses the idiot horde leftists as tools – a manipulated horde shifted and manipulated by other degenerates for one grand goal: wreck it all, that all may be “equal.”

Radical egalitarianism is one of the most fanatical, dangerous and inconsistent positions of the modern authoritarian left.  Since evil is located by the authoritarian left in distinctions and differences, all these must be obliterated.  That includes race and gender, which must be said to be “social constructs.”  It seems odd that anyone would believe anything so absurd, but this extremist view of social engineering is held so tenaciously because of deeper, more foundational philosophical commitments.  To be even clearer, the philosophical commitment is not held because of some mere error in thinking.  On the contrary, the notion that all humans need to be cured of evil desires is good education is precisely the root of the problem.  For the modern authoritarian left, man’s problem in the collectivist equation is his lack of education.  This is why, for the left, their “elite” are the supposed academic, political and theater classes, all of which are socially oriented classes.  This is the fundamental flaw that must be unmasked in modern authoritarian liberalism, and is must be exposed by the use of reason and logic, but reason and logic are viewed by them as prisons and strictures to be rejected.

Sawyer plays the confidence man in the Lost episode of the same title.

Sawyer plays the confidence man in the Lost episode of the same title.

In this regard, evil is simultaneously rational and irrational.  Because evil is irrational, in its rebellion against the order that reason imposes, it seeks to be irrational and chaotic to fight reason.  But implicit in this drive to be irrational is a kind of logic – a logoi of evil, which is therefore still rational.  Van Til called this becoming epistemically self-conscious – evil seeks to become consistent with itself, in its inconsistency.  Evil cannot be consistent with its attack on reason – to do so is a manifestation of still being rational.  In this analysis, I don’t mean to suggest any kind of rationalism of the Enlightenment version.  I mentioned Foucault above and many in the postmodern and existentialist schools will see in this paragraph “rationalism.”  I once had a long discussion with one of my postmodern professors who accused this kind of analysis of being rationalism.  In response to that it should be made clear that talk of reason as a tool and a divine light given to man is not the same thing as the Enlightenment/Jacobin enthronement of “reason” as a kind of pseudo-goddess.  The professor is right that Enlightenment rationalism is an excess, but so is the far eastern rejection of logic and reason en toto!

It is always the temptation of humans to make evil have an actual ontological existence.  By this it is not meant that there is no evil, that it is some illusion.  On the contrary, evil is very real, but in the technical philosophical sense it has no actual ontological existence.  It has no “being,” if you will.  Evil is a relative term – it is the move of a will away from some good.  It is not a “thing” or a substance.  In fact, evil is not even the will, which is a faculty given by God.  Evil is a descriptive term given to the action of a sentient being moving its will away from some good, and that is all it is.  In this sense, it is right to say evil is a negation, like ugliness or deformation.  Consider a man who is ugly: the source of the deformation is not the molecules in his body, which he shares with a beautiful woman, but the lack of beauty in his form.  In a similar fashion, evil is not located in some thing, as its being or essence, but in the move of a free being’s will against some good end.

When I was writing my thesis, I got enveloped in a fascinating book by Gordon Corera that detailed inside experience in MI6.  The book Art of Betrayal is excellent, and while being in some degree an “establishment” book, it is still amazing in what it admits.  From MKULTRA to Soviet intrigue, what is most interesting is what I outlined above: there is an art to betrayal, which in effect makes the real modus operandi of the modern world system closer to what one sees in Melville’s lesser classic Confidence Man.  In Confidence Man a crowd of various individuals take a steamboat ride down the Mississippi and encounter the confidence man himself, the devil.  In the novel each character is forced to confront the thing in which they place their trust with the possibility of it being a fraud.  The reader is also expected to question his own presuppositions.  While this novel can be placed in the existentialist strand, it is also a great example of how the network of intelligence agencies that run the plant for the megabanks and mega corporations works.   As Corera’s book title explains, they are confidence men (and women) who are the masters of the art of betrayal.

Gordon Corera's fascinating book, "The Art of Betrayal."

Gordon Corera’s fascinating book, “The Art of Betrayal.”

How does this relate to the metaphysical speculations on evil?  All three elements listed in the title are connected: evil, intrigue and the left, in terms of deception.  When the leftist attacks objective truth under the guise of arguing against it, they are presupposing the very thing they are attacking: logic.  When the Eastern philosopher rejects logic with its reasoning, they are doing the same.  When evil seeks to be irrational, it is being in a sense rational.  When the left seeks to remove structures and institutions, it does so with the erection of a new structure and hierarchy.  This is not to say tha the “right” has cornered the market on truth and lack of deception.  But the key factor the right has in its favor is the firm belief in objective truth and reason.  For this reason, it opposes the state’s monopoly on power in instances where the state seeks to muddle the populace into slobbering retardation for the purpose of easier management.  In these cases the state becomes god incarnate with a relativistic, trendy hipster idiot population submitting to its whims.  So when the skeptic approaches the actual functioning of the world and doubts “conspiracy,” they should take a look at it from the perspective of what intelligence operatives write in their mainstream books or from the perspective of Machiavelli and Melville.   For a “leftist skeptic” to admit that there is large-scale nefarious conspiring requires the leftist to inadvertently reexamine his presuppositions.  For that to be the case, it would mean that there is truth and there are objective standards – the very thing the authoritarian leftist cannot admit, except for his own dogmatic standard.

5 Comments on On Evil, Intrigue and the Left

  1. It doesn’t occur to the Gnostico-monists that if multi-varied reality is indeed the manifestation of the One, then even multiplicity and distinction manifest the One in some sense, hence the absurdity of even calling it “the One.” But this is just the age-old difference between theophanic, sacramental metaphysics and Gnostic, dualistic/monistic (they end up collapsing into the same thing) claptrap: affirmation of reality, life, beauty, personhood, and love vs. ultimately fruitless, yet still temporarily catastrophic, attempts at annihilation.

  2. I have encountered in my life an experience of interaction with what I consider to be pure evil. I was an atheist at that point, but after that experience I have found my path to God. I understood very clearly on instinctive level that God exists, just like some evil entity, Devil, if you will. So I don’t believe in this, I know this for a fact myself now. You are right that on a personal level evil is in fact a willful deviation from the God’s law, since, as you stated absolutely exactly, free will is a prerogative, a gift given by God to humans! But what makes people willingly go against the Law of God, which in fact serves best interest of humans and provides the best possible guidelines for the happy life? Without any doubt there is some external force (energy, being or beings, whatever, call’em Devil or demons) which in fact deceives or sometimes even forces (the weak ones) humans into using their free will against the God’s Law. So generally speaking Evil is not just some kind of manifestation free will, but also a real entity in both physical and non-physical dimensions. And the elite know this all well…. for the centuries they studied the occult and magic to gain the power they have now. While the sheeple discards the occultism of many rich and powerful as some fad or craziness, the elite in fact takes it all too serious. The higher ranks of Military and Intelligence are occultists, who serve the elites and who help them generate the energy they need for maintaining their power. After all magic is nothing but evil energy management. And yes the art of betrayal is sure an important skill nowadays, yet the reason why all the betrayers end up being betrayed is that one cannot betray the Master of Betrayal, deceive the King of Deception and see through the lies of the Emperor of Lies. That being the Devil itself.

    • This is frequently misunderstood. The explanation of evil I gave above is consonant with the eastern fathers’ explanation. The reason for this is that everything that has existence or being is created by God. In Genesis God says it is “good.” So nothing that has being or existence is inherently evil. That created things are inherently evil is Gnosticism. Evil most certainly is real, and there are a multitude of evil sngels and men that use their human and angelic energy in opposition to God.

      • Alexander // January 30, 2013 at 7:16 am //

        Sure, initially even Lucifer used to be the God’s favorite angel… But as of now there is evil for sure and as I understand from the texts of the Bible some things and beings are clearly defined as evil. I have not seen any texts implying that Lucifer and his fallen angels will repent. Seems even God is disappointed with them and several times it is mentioned in the Bible that when time comes bad seed/bad tree/etc… and literally the Devil and his demons will be brought to trial and then burn forever. Maybe some deliberate error has been done in translation sometime back in history (like the infamous “outside of Faith there is no salvation” which somehow became “outside of Church there’s no salvation”) in order to make the scripture look questionable, which in turn made people (with the help of the Devil himself) come up with numerous satanic theories, which all sound very smart, but… “By their fruits ye shall know them” So far all and I mean ALL religious and pseudo-religious and philosophical currents, except Christianity, Islam and Buddhism outside of hierarchical Church, which is also corrupted now, have been working on the same satanic agenda of establishing the New World Order, which actually is a battle for the soul of humanity (to make humanity love Big Brother i.e. Satan, speaking in Orwellian terms). Since the power of religion has been declining humanity is becoming more and more possessed and the world is getting crazier each and every day. So I am sure that there is evil. Maybe it hadn’t been such long-long time ago, but now it is evil for sure and it is not likely to change.

    • Evil is a mockery of Divinity. So if Divinity has/is reality, evil will try to make itself look like it has/is reality. And if Divinity is beyond reality–if Divinity is mysterious–then evil will try to look like it is beyond reality and is mysterious. Hence the enigmatic nature of any discussion of evil, and hence the very convincing illusion there is an actual real essence of “evil.”

      Apokatastasis as an expectation is heresy, yes, but is apokatastasis as a hope? One can hope that even the devils–who in their tremendous power *appear* to be incarnations of some evil essence–can and will repent. And isn’t this what the Christian hope is, that the cosmic bad joke known to us as “evil” will just disappear like the horrendous nightmare it is?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: