Russian/Chinese Geo-political Strategies Versus the West

Angelina Jolie on the set of "Salt," in which she plays a Soviet sleeper agent deeply embedded in the CIA.  She holds on set a copy of "War of Necessity" by Richard N Haas, CFR

Angelina Jolie on the set of "Salt," in which she plays a Soviet sleeper agent deeply embedded in the CIA. She holds on set a copy of "War of Necessity" by Richard N Haas, CFR

Related - See The West, Russia, Eurasian Union and Esoterism By: Jay Some analysts have noted that the Cold War is, on an important level, still raging.  The continued espionage between China, Russia and the U.S. represents a real strategic threat that will mean an eventual confrontation between the superpowers.  It is worth noting that the Western media never rarely focuses on threats from either China or Russia, aside from sensationalistic stories that circulated about Anna Chapman.  However, Bloomberg did recently run a story that shows there are still plenty of good people in the FBI and CIA.  The article states: "Hearkening back to Cold War anxieties, growing signs of spying on U.S. universities are alarming national security officials. As schools become more global in their locations and student populations, their culture of openness and international collaboration makes them increasingly vulnerable to theft of research conducted for the government and industry." The idiocy here is that the very establishment that publishes Department of Defense analysis papers on strategic risk trends is the same establishment that pushes all the very policies that lead to a mass influx of foreign intelligence recruits.  It may seem odd to some that youth would be the target of intelligence recruitment or foreign spying, but the truth is the very opposite.  The youth were recruited by both Hitler and Stalin.  Youth is the prime time of life, when arrogance is at its highest and the tempting lure of becoming a "spy" is irresistible to naive young minds. The Wall Street Journal reports of the Chapman spy ring: "A Russian spy ring busted in the U.S. two years ago planned to recruit members' children to become agents, and one had already agreed to his parents' request, according to current and former U.S. officials....Children born or reared in America were potentially more valuable espionage assets than their parents because when they grew up they would be more likely to pass a U.S. government background check."  As a side note, remember that Salt came out around the time of the Anna Chapman event, and included Jolie inviting Chapman to attend the Moscow premier of the film. This is standard fare and nothing new, historically.  Grevork Andreyevich Vartanyan was a famed spy for Russia and was recruited by the Stalinist regime at an early age.  The DailyMail writes: "The legendary Russian-born spy was the son of  an Iranian factory owner of Armenian origin. His father took the family back to  Iran in the 1930s as part of a mission decreed by Stalin.  He enlisted his son who was working  undercover by the age of 16." The standard, modern authoritarian leftists and republiconmunists live in a delusional fantasy world where none of this history happened.  The real world is full of espionage, conspiracy and theft of important secrets, despite the very modern idea that "conspiracy" is a fringe circle with little actual evidence to back it up.  Particularly during the Clinton era, the Anglo-American powers armed and built up the North Korean arsenal through its aid to China.  Newsmax reported in 2003:
Russian Spy Ring of 2010

Russian Spy Ring of 2010

"During the early Clinton years, hard-liners and so-called conservative hawks advocated a pre-emptive strike to halt North Korea's nuclear weapons development before it could field an atomic bomb. Instead of taking the hard-line, President Clinton elected to rely on former President Jimmy Carter and decided to appease the Marxist-Stalinist dictatorship.
China and North Korea: partners in communism.

China and North Korea: partners in communism.

Carter met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-il in Pyongyang and returned to America waving a piece of paper and declaring peace in our time. Kim, according to Carter, had agreed to stop his nuclear weapons development.  The Clinton appeasement program for North Korea included hundreds of millions of dollars in aid, food, oil and even a nuclear reactor. However, the agreement was flawed and lacked even the most informal means of verification.  In return, Kim elected to starve his people while using the American aid to build uranium bombs. The lowest estimate is that Kim starved to death over 1 million of his own people, even with the U.S. aid program."

Continuing, the report notes:

“North Korea was not left all alone in its effort to obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea relied heavily on China, its closest ally, to assist in its all-out effort to obtain the atomic bomb.  Beijing elected to covertly aid its North Asian ally by proliferation. China allowed Pakistan to send nuclear technology purchased from Beijing to North Korea in exchange for No Dong missile technology.  Beijing provided Pakistan with its nuclear weapons technology, including an operational atomic bomb design. Pakistan is now providing North Korea with equipment and engineering to assist in its bomb-making efforts….In 1994, the Wall Street Journal revealed that Chinese-made CSS-2 missile technology had found its way into North Korean hands.”

I'm down for a honeytrap anytime!

I’m down for a honeytrap anytime!

Oops! Don’t forget that nuke codes were also “accidently” lost under the Clinton administration, but before republitards get excited, they were lost under Cheney, too!  The Telegraph states about the Clinton codes:

“Gen Hugh Shelton, who was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, said in his new memoir, “Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior” that “the codes were actually missing for months. That’s a big deal — a gargantuan deal.”  A similar claim was made by Lt Col Robert Patterson, a former aide, in a book published seven years ago. He was one of the men who carried the briefcase, known as the “football”, and he said that the morning after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke that he made a routine request of the president to present the card so that he could provide an updated version.

“He thought he just placed them upstairs,” Lt Col Patterson recalled. “We called upstairs, we started a search around the White House for the codes, and he finally confessed that he in fact misplaced them. He couldn’t recall when he had last seen them.”  He said the President lost the card holding the codes, which is known as the biscuit, in 1998, but according to Gen Shelton, the card went missing in 2000.”

Keep in mind that sometimes news stories are faked for propagandist purposes, so the constant “loss” of nukes could also be a psy op for alternate purposes.  The same is true of the spy rings, which are hyped and given media attention to turn them into celebrity events, distract from real infiltration, as opposed to exposing real threats.  There was a similar incident associated with the Bush administration and Minot AFB:

An interesting connection here is the A.Q. Kahn nuclear network that helped funnel these secrets from the West, to the rest of the “rogue states,” most likely by traitorous elements in the West.

The  Collins brothers, citing analyst Joseph Trento, have done excellent work in detailing the analysis of the overall project of the AQ Khan Network being used by certain elite factions to foment a future global conflict.  They write:

“The power elite birthed the Khan network through an alliance known as the Safari Club. The Safari Club was a partnership between the American elite and the Saudi elite. According to investigative reporter Joseph Trento, this partnership switched the CIA’s “reliance, for regional intelligence, from Israel to Saudi Arabia” (99). In 1974, the pro-Israel elements within the CIA lost dominance when Counterintelligence chief James Angleton was fired (99). The Agency resented Angleton for his “special relationship with Israel” (99).

In 1976, with the Israel sympathizer out of the way, the Agency turned to the Saudi royal family for help. Times were tough for CIA. America’s ground involvement in Vietnam ended in 1973. Two years later, Saigon fell. 1974 had seen the emergence of the Watergate scandal. Finally, in 1976, America was fed up. It was the infamous “Year of Intelligence.” The Church and Pike Committees began exposing crime and corruption within the intelligence community. Congress was not going to give a nickel to intelligence operations anywhere in the world. With money being tight, the Agency turned to the Saudis for the cash it needed. Through the Safari Club, “the Saudi royal family had taken over intelligence            financing for the United States” (102).

In fact, here is an intelligence report that confirms the widespread influence and connections of the Khan Network that suggests a colorful cast fo characters that aid in helping anti-western regimes, such as Iran and North Korea.  It was Benazir Bhutto, according to AQ Khan, who helped the Khan network operate:

“Dr Khan is known as the father of Pakistan’s atom bomb but was also at the centre of a proliferation network that sold secret technology to rogue states around the world, including Libya and Iran.  In 2004 he signed a confession claiming that he acted without the consent of the government and was pardoned the following day, an account he has now contradicted.  “The then Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto summoned me and named the two countries which were to be assisted,” Dr Khan said in an interview with the Jang media group, without naming the two nations.”

Recall that Bhutto was killed, and to add a twist to this story, she had just spoken at my university a few months before she was assassinated.  My university, I should note, is a hotbed of Marxism and Marxist indoctrination, as the school regularly features openly Marxist keynote speakers, United Nations bureaucrats, authoritarian leftists, “former” Soviet agents, and radicals.  From socialists like Desmond Tutu to Lech Walesa, the roster has consistently been radically left and controlled to such a radical degree that it is laughable, with one or two “conservatives” allowed to speak in smaller rooms on campus.  And this is where the story comes full circle: powerful and traitorous western interests are precisely the ones fomenting the destruction and sovietization of the United States.  We read recently in the Brussels Journal:

“Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a full-fledged totalitarian state.”

A short time after this, the EU commisar Von Rompuy met with Putin to call for global governance of the EU with Russia. This was exactly what the Socialist Internationale had planned all along, as a Moscow satellite, as analyst Joel Skousen has accurately predicted.

China, however, is content to build its armaments and attempt to team up with Russia and the western traitors until the time is right for a pre-emptive strike on the West with Russia, leading to a possible double-cross from Russia.  These three predatory power centers are actively engaged in taking down the West, with America as the prize. Skousen writes:

“China clearly has its sights set on world hegemony. The attitude of oriental superiority over occidental bourgeoisie has long pervaded China and even predates Russian predatory tendencies. Realistic analysts who have long experience with both Russia and China know that neither will long be subservient to the other.  Russia and China may attempt to use each other for short-term gain, but will eventually tangle for ultimate supremacy.

For the present, Russia and China are teaming up against the West in a new unilateral quest for arms. This is no surprise. The Russians have been arming China, off and on, since the Chinese Communists came to power under Chairman Mao. But now, the Chinese are playing both sides of the fence, East and West. Knowing that Russia is willing to supply it with plentiful quantities of second-rate equipment, China is looking toward the West for advanced American technology and funding in order to upgrade its Soviet and home-grown equipment. At present the US globalist inside at the Pentagon cannot get away with arming China directly, but both Republican and Democratic administrations in recent years have been successful at making it easy for Chinese spies to pierce the US curtain of protection against espionage. It began in the George Bush Sr. administration when the Chinese were given open access to key US defense plants like Hughes Aircraft, and reached tidal wave proportions during the Clinton era. US technology transfers continued unabated during the George W. Bush presidency. The Bush Commerce Department allowed and regularly approved special exceptions to rules as they apply to dual-use transfers to China. This has continued during the Obama administration.”

China is content to keep establishing thousands of front companies and buying up out debt. WorldNetDaily reports:

“China has established more than 3,000 “front” companies in the U.S. to  conduct espionage and will become the United States’ greatest intelligence  threat in the next decade, according to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III.

Mueller told Congress earlier this month the Chinese companies are  coordinating espionage efforts against America via thousands of visitors,  students and business people who visit the U.S. annually. He said each of them  also have a task to perform for Beijing, reported Canada’s Asian Pacific  Post.

McAdam worked on “Project Sidewinder,” which essentially was conducted by  CSIS and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or RCMP, between 1994 and 1996.

His study, the Post said, mimics the FBI’s assertions China is the most  significant intelligence threat to the West – particularly North America – in  the world today….

“It also examined the ability of elements of Asian Organized Crime to act in  concert with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the PRC to take control of  sensitive Canadian industries and corrupt our politicians through direct and  indirect donations,” the paper said.

Other intelligence experts agree on the spy threat posed by China.”

The West is being turned Soviet, as evidenced by the kinds of policies the authoritarian left institutes in both England and the U.S. As mentioned above, the practice of children tattle tale spies in now a reality, as the DailyMail reports:

“Pupils are being encouraged to shop tax  dodgers to their teachers by HM Revenue & Customs.  Tax officers have developed teaching modules  for schools in which youngsters are asked if they know anyone ‘in their local  area’ who is not paying their fair share.  HMRC said it did not use the scheme to  collect information about tax evaders from children.  But critics said it was ‘un-British’ of the  taxman to try to turn ‘children into state spies.'”

Child spies for the Superstate from the excellent film "Equilibrium"

Child spies for the Superstate from the excellent film “Equilibrium”

This is why Globalresearch is now reporting that China and Russia are concerned the US is building a first strike capacity armament. Keep this in mind when viewing alternative media: most of the mainstream and alternative media reporting is almost entirely anti-western, and rarely critical of Russia and almost never of China.  This analysis also backs up Skousen’s analysis of the Russian and Chinese concerns over American ABM sites and secret tech:

“Russia’s army, navy as well as air force still have the capability to deal with any challenge. Moscow’s Topol-M missiles are its major strategic nuclear deterrent and the project to deploy them is the most important part of its national armament planning. Russia has a reliable protection system, which also consists of multi-range anti-aircraft missiles to defend against air attacks from even high-precision non-nuclear weapons.

The Russian army has a multi-level firepower system, comprising C-400 and C-400M anti-aircraft missiles, and Thor and Amor anti-aircraft missile launchers, which is regarded as the best anti-aircraft power combination targeting PGS.

Since Russia’s strategic weapon system is better than China’s in terms of numbers, mobility and protection capabilities, some experts believe that the US army’s PGS poses a greater threat to China than Russia.”

The article’s later discussion of “peace” and disarmament is the classic communistic tactic, when Russia and China are arming to the teeth:

“Some insightful people in the US have indeed emphasized the importance of maintaining global strategic stability. In 1967, Robert McNamara, then US secretary of defense, suggested that the former Soviet Union restrict the development of its anti-missile system to avoid escalating tensions. Initially, the Soviet Union opposed the idea but eventually it accepted it because it realized that developing the anti-missile system was destabilizing the world. This led to the 1972 Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems between the Soviet Union and the US.

In 1985, when the US began experiments on how to use missiles to destroy low earth orbit satellites, many American senators and scholars said a US-Soviet Union race in this field was dangerous. Since the Soviet Union had unilaterally stopped its anti-satellite experiments in 1983, the US also gave up its tests later.

People who value peace hope that long-distance launching vehicles for precision-guided conventional warheads and missile defense systems will be part of the agenda at the strategic arms reduction talks.”

13 Comments on Russian/Chinese Geo-political Strategies Versus the West

  1. “Globalresearch is now reporting that China and Russia are building a “global first strike capacity” against the West.”

    I’m sorry, but do you have some reading comprehension problem or are you deliberately underrating the intelligence of your readers? The Globalesearch article states the exact opposite. That it is the US that it is building global first strike capacity against primarily Russia and then China, not the other way around. It is the US and the globalist-financial oligarchy of the West that controls it that does not tolerate an independent Russia operating outside their system. That’s why they’re building a Missile Defense that they believe will give them first strike capability against Russia, so that they can at one point in the future say to Russia “you either surrender your sovereignty and resources to us or be destroyed.”

  2. But if you think Russia is a good guy against the West, you are mistaken. They are co-predatory power blocs.

    • No. This view doesn’t hold up when you look at the facts. Russia has repeatedly shown its good faith towards the US and the West and it has been betrayed every time. To remind you:

      1. Gorbachev agrees to the unification of Germany in exchange for the US promise that NATO will not move one inch towards Russia’s borders. We know how this turned out.

      2. Despite the promise by the US that it will not interfere in Russia’s sphere of influence, it bombed Serbia in order to create and Islamist narco-state- and human organ trafficking outpost in Kosovo.

      2. Russian President Vladimir Putin was the first to call Bush Jr after 9/11 offering his full support, providing valuable intelligence and help for the US army in the Afghanistan war due to the Russian experience from its decade long war there. How Bush Jr returned the favor? By expanding NATO again and by unilaterally withdrawing from the ABM treaty.

      3. US funded, armed and trained the Georgian army in order to attack Russian peacekeepers and civilians in S. Ossetia, thus declaring war by proxy against Russia.

      There is only one aggressor and only one side threatening the world with a nuclear war and that is the US. Russia and China only want their vital interests respected and the US not meddling in their internal affairs. The US is trying to start WW3 and thank God for Russia and China for stopping them for the time being. The decision of a first strike against Russia is a foregone decision when the Missile Shield is fully operational.

      All stuff about “Soviet Union never dissolving” and “Russia arming in order to strike the West first” are Russophobic cold-war era based baloney not in touch with reality. Russia and China are stabilizing factors in the world arena. The US and its client states are the threats to world peace and life on this planet.

      • There aren’t good guys and bad guys in geo-politics. There are competing predatory powers that seek dominance. When the US collapses, the internationalists will go for Russia next, just as Russia and China don’t trust each other. This is Machiavelli 101 and the line you’re giving is very true – but only true as the anti-western line that’s fed in non-US media.

  3. America will not collapse, at least not in the cataclysmic way of the Soviet Union. I think it will seek further integration with its Transatlantic client states under US hegemony, since very soon it will not be able to counter the Russo-Chinese block alone. The missile shield is an attempt by the US to put its “allies” under its umbrella and can be seen as a first step towards this direction. The second is further economic integration through the elite created US and Euro crises. So the worst it could happen to the US is to go from unipolarity to non-polarity.

    For confirmation of the ABM as a first strike weapon see: F. William Engdahl: Why Moscow does not Trust Washington on Missile Defense. Towards a Pre-emptive Nuclear War?

    “Lt. Colonel Bowman, in a telephone interview with this author called missile defense, “the missing link to a First Strike.”

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-moscow-does-not-trust-washington-on-missile-defense-towards-a-pre-emptive-nuclear-war/27987

    The internationalist-globalist rootless cosmopolitan parasites are already after Russia. Hence all the meddling in its internal affairs and demonization of Putin. I tend to agree with Carl Schmitt who despite being a staunch anticommunist foresaw US-western liberalism as a much more dangerous ideology than Communism. It is the west today that represents left-wing ideology while Russia defends right-wing and traditionalist principles. So my allegiance is with Russia.

    See:

    1. John Laughland’s Leftism and the West:

    http://www.idc-europe.org/en/John-Laughland-on-the-leftism-of-the-West

    2. Alain Soral: sedentaries versus nomadic-predators (eng subs)

    3. American Imperialism and its Supporters:

    http://www.ridingthetiger.org/2011/06/28/americanimperalism-and-its-supporters/

    “The fact remains though, that America is a state controlled by imperialist finance-capital, making it a “prison” of nations. What is also true is that because American society is a rootlessly cosmopolitan society with a degenerate culture, America is the enemy of all the peoples of the world, whether they are Christian or Moslem, White or Black, Western or Oriental; they are not liberators, but aggressive globalist imperialists whose aim is the destruction of all identities other than the one they wish to impose on others.”

    4. The crisis of the Modern World, eschatology, globalism, the New World Order and Kali Yuga

    http://integraltradition.org/main-issues-of-integral-tradition/the-crisis-of-the-modern-world-eschatology-globalism-the-new-world-order-and-kali-yuga/

    “This New World Order was proclaimed the moment the old Eastern Bloc disintegrated. It is obvious that there are peoples who are not part of this Order. The Chinese superpower is not a member of the club; nor is India, and Russia remains unwelcome. The Islamic world cannot be part of a system that directly involves Zionism. African countries scarcely count at all. This does not mean that these lands are not penetrated by international capital, nor that they don’t contain sectors who would dearly welcome globalism. It does not mean that cheap labour countries are not exploited to provide cheap products – or immigrants to the factories of the home-bases of the NWO. The fact that whole areas of the globe are outside this system means that its claim to political normality is a basic lie. It must thence rely upon the impact of economic globalisation for its power.”

  4. “Yockey thought Russia would be some future bastion though”

    Not only Yockey. Since I see that you also have an interest in esoteric readings and perspectives, here’s an article that demonstrates that Russia is not part of the Hegelian dialectic many people accuse it for, but the base that will shape the forces of history and cause a global paradigm shift on a completely different path than the one that the Western power elites planned (spiritual & traditional vs secular and materialistic)c. This is why they’re terrified of Russia under Putin’s rule and why I think the traditionalist revival is not a faux one.

    The Secret of Eurasia – The Key to Hidden History:

    http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/11nov/secreteurasia.html

    “but one thing I agree with is that the Anglo nwo is in trouble, and probably wants to go the war route.”

    See also Richard K. Moore: Prognosis 2012. I quote a key section:

    “Part 2: Preparing the way for global domination

    So far we’ve been looking mainly at the West, and the plans of Western elites regarding a post-capitalist regime. We now need to bring Russia and China into the picture. Both nations have resisted being tamed by the Western banking elite. They still make their decisions on the basis of their perceived national interests. They are also working very closely together, economically and militarily.

    If the world goes on, business as usual, it is only a matter of time before China eclipses the West economically, and Russia and China together dominate geopolitics. Strategic thinkers have long talked about the ‘Grand Chessboard’, about how Eurasia, with its land mass, population, and resources, is the natural power center of the world. In a very real sense, their time has come.

    However, for obvious reasons, this business-as-usual scenario is not to the liking of our Western banking elites. They intend to intervene in the natural course of events, as they have so often in the past, as they did with the two world wars. They do not intend for their power base to be eclipsed by Russia and China.

    The US has surrounded Russia and China with military bases, and it is setting up a ring of anti-missile systems around their borders. Meanwhile the Pentagon is spending trillions developing a first-strike capability, with space-based weapons systems, control-of-theater capability, forward-based ‘tactical’ nukes, etc. The anti-missile systems are an important part of a first-strike strategy, reducing the ability of Russia or China to retaliate.

    These elaborate military preparations are not in response to any threat from Russia or China. Those two would be quite happy to see a stable, multi-polar world. They’d be quite happy to support substantial nuclear disarmament globally. The Pentagon’s war preparations mean only one thing: the Western elites are not going to give up their position of global dominance.

    The War on Terrorism has been essential in justifying the astronomical military budgets required for these massive military deployments. Besides, the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are themselves part of the encirclement strategy, as well as serving to control oil sources and pipeline routes.

    There may or may not be a World War 3, but all of these preparations make it clear that our banking elite intend to preside over a global system, by hook or by crook. If they wanted a peaceful arrangement, a splitting of the third-world pie, so to speak, it could have been easily arranged at any time. It is only our elite bankers who are obsessed with world domination.

    It is possible that nuclear war is a ‘desired outcome’, accomplishing depopulation, and making the collapse even more total. OR PERHAPS CHINA AND RUSSIA WILL BE GIVEN AN OFFER THEY CAN’T REFUSE: SURRENDER YOUR ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY TO OUR GLOBAL SYSTEM, OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES ( this what the ABM is really for).

    One way or another, the elite bankers, the masters of the universe, intend to preside over a micromanaged global system. The collapse project is now well underway, and the ‘surround your enemy’ project seems to be more or less completed. From a strategic perspective, there will be some trigger point, some stage in the economic collapse scenario, when geopolitical confrontation is judged to be most advantageous. It’s a multi-dimensional chess board, and with the stakes so high, you can rest assured that the timing of the various moves will be carefully coordinated. And from the overall shape of the board, we seem to be nearing the endgame.”

    My comment. As we see Russia and China stand in the way of this global system the western elites want to impose and that’s why by using the US military machine they control, want to intimidate them in surrendering or face destruction.

  5. “Also, I’ve read Yockey and Spengler, and do understand the danger of American liberalism.”

    Another really good read, mentioning Yockey, is this:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/08/26/the-united-states-the-greatest-threat-to-the-white-race/

    and also this:

    http://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/08/20/the-wilsonian-world-order-will-fall-apart/

    “As for China, Rockefeller and the CFR see it as a model for the future – not the Anglo west, which is to be deindustrialized”

    Concerning China’s and Russia’s future role, a very interesting perspective from the comment section of the above article and I quote:

    “China will be number one…”, yes and no or, more likely, it will be for a short time but in the end it will be all about smoke and mirrors. China has a gazillion people, yes, it’s an industrial m
    onster, indeed, and has all the productive reserves of rare earth metals, undoubtedly. But it has an awful industrial efficiency that wastes energetic resources while in Japan or Germany you can produce 1 unit for half of the energy that China requires, a decaying farm land in process of desertification and above all, no water nor energy reserves.

    The number one afterwards the collapse of the dollar (and the jewsa) will be Russia, the third Rome, as the monk Philotheus of Pskov prophesied in the XVI Century. It has a vast and loyal army, an strong political government without patience for BS, the territory of a continent, humongous hydraulic and hydrocarbon resources, the control of the routes to the resource rich countries on Central Asia, and a long, long, long history of kicking his enemies asses.

    The “Great China of XXI Century” is a chinese tail tale, a myth that will show its cracks once the jewnited states starts to crumble. Russia and maybe Brazil (If they get rid of the niggers) will be the countries of tomorrow while China and India will become shitholes of hunger and poverty to the amazement of the moronic economists that bet for them.”

    My comment: In short I believe that the mighty China that will rule the world is a BS myth perpetrated by the Globalists that you named.

  6. In 1917, he turned an honorary member of Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia (the nationwide fraternity
    for men concerned in music, by the fraternity’s
    Alpha chapter at the New England Conservatory of
    Music in Boston).

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. The West, Russia, Eurasian Union and Esoterism « Jay's Analysis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: