The Cold War is Not Over – International Socialism’s Attack

U.S.S.A.

“We believe that all men are created equal.” -J.F.K.

By: Jay

My recent research has involved international socialism and the Cold War attack on the West.  In many “conspiracy” circles, often tending towards leftism, it’s very popular to paint the picture that the Cold War was a giant facade intent upon bolstering the buildup of the giant surveillance state.  There is some truth to this: For example, Professor Antony Sutton did produce evidence of support from certain powerful Western elites for the Soviet Union and its rise, particularly with regard to Soviet industrialization, while David Rockefeller aided in the installation of Mao Zedong, writing in the New York Times that the Chinese model was to be the model for social transformation of the East and West.

Indeed, other writers have mentioned the convergence of East and West into a mixed economy of a world socialist state of a third or fourth way.  In this regard, fascist powers were not really in conflict with centralized state communist powers, and received Western elite support as well, as pawns in the global chessboard and as social engineering experiments.  Fabian socialism, international socialism/Marxism, international corporatism,  Imperialism, and shadow government/cryptocracy are all models that are global in extent.  While it might seem wisdom to speak of limitations of expansion and imperial hubris, the reality is, the world state is always in flux, with competing, multi-polar powers seeking to topple rivals.  That “peace” will be achieved by some legislation or utopian visions are, of course, products of human naivety and never realistic.

Our era is one of multi-polar powers, but those multi-polar powers are largely controlled by a shadow government/cryptocracy that is presently the Anglo-establishment.   While this structure has received much bad press over the century, the subtle complexity of our actual geo-political is not easily discernible.  Binary models of East versus West or capitalism versus socialism are oversimplifications, but in reality these forces are real and are in opposition.  To those of the school of convergence, the East and West will be merged into a world socialist republic ruled by a technocractic and financial elite.   This form elitism assumes itself to be based on Darwinianism mechanistic process and Pelagian, Enlightenment tabula rasa social engineering, intent on establishing a “rational” global order or global environmental  eugenic legislation.  This is the dominant ideology of the present Western liberal elite.  Mechanistic, materialistic Darwinism thus melds well with collectivist models like Marxism, as well as so-called individualistic anarcho-capitalism, known as social Darwinism.

Liberty! Equality! Bullshit!

One need only look to someone like H.G. Wells, who wrote in many places, including his Outlines of History, that a masonic socialist order would eventually arise from utopian socialism.  This leads to the thrust of this article: Grand Orient Freemasonry, the power behind international socialism and communism, is not dead, and continues to seek the destruction of the West.  Grand Orient Freemasonry, it must be carefully noted, is atheistic and Satanic.  In contrast to the more conservative British Masonic Orders that remain loyal to the monarchy, Grand Orient Freemasonry can be seen as tied into the P-2 lodge, with its scandals, as well as the infiltration of the Vatican through its power source, Moscow.  Moscow, aside from being aided by powerful western elites, did become a superpower and was a threat.  Whatever one’s view of the Vatican, the infiltration of Rome by all forms of subversion was very real, and was largely handled out of Moscow and aided by the Gramscian Italian communists.  In fact, the Grand Orient/P-2 were intimately involved in the assassination of John Paul I, as we know from the Roberto Calvi scandal. Read more of this post

Lenin’s False Flag Terrorism and Philosophy Echo Hitler & US

By: Jay

I was awestruck while reading a biography on V.I. Lenin recently.  The strange synchronicities concern his creation of a massively extended police state-the “Cheka,” compared with the actions of Hitler and our modern U.S. are prodigious, to say the least.  One might be tempted to think that, since Lenin was a Communist and of Jewish origin, there would be no similarity between his philosophy and Hitler’s.  However, the facts speak otherwise.  Hitler was a  racist and an occultist to be sure, but it is not often mentioned that Lenin was, as well.  The explanation for this is that the real power behind these statist regimes in the false dialectic of communist and fascist is the banking power.

Despite his appearance of being a sophisticated, modern atheist, Vladimir Lenin appears to have had an affinity for the Satanic (as did Marx). According to researcher Juri Lina and the Modern History Project, was inducted into the Masonic Lodge of the Nine Sisters.  Lenin’s philosophy was, in fact, highly racial: a key point missed and ignored by many researchers.  In fact, Lenin, like many of the elites (such as Hitler), was obsessed with bloodlines and racial purity.  Lenin Biographer Dmitri Volkogonov writes:

“Paradoxically, for a Marxist who believed in the primacy of the environmental over inherited factors, she [Lenin's sister] also asserted the dubious proposition that Lenin’s Jewish origins are further confirmation of the exceptional abilities of the Semitic tribe, [confirmation] always shared by [Vladimir] Ilyich Lenin…Lenin always valued Jews highly.’  Anna’s claim explains, for instance, why Lenin frequently recommended giving foreigners, especially Jews, intellectually demanding tasks, and leaving the elementary work to the ‘Russian fools.’ [Anna continuing] ‘…in the Lenin Institute, as well as in the Institute of the Brain…they have long recognized the great gifts of this [Jewish] nation and the extremely beneficial effects of its blood on the progeny of mixed marriages.  Ilyich himself rated their revolutionary qualities highly, their ‘tenacity’ in the struggle, as he put it, contrasting it with the more sluggish and unstable character of the Russians.  He often pointed out that the great attributes of organization and the strength of the revolutionary bodies in the south and west of Russia arose precisely from the fact that 50% of their members were of that nationality.”[i]           Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers