The Great Dystopian Mass Culling to Come

February 21, 2013 5 Comments

"Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses."

“Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses.”

You are now living in a dystopian science fiction movie

By: Jay

As I watch the classic science fiction films and read the novels, particularly the dystopian genre, it becomes evident that each one has its own piece of the puzzle for the coming future nightmare.  From 2001: A Space Odyssey to Soylent Green to 1984 to THX1138, these works of art give us insight into the coming zeitgeist.  The reality of a global technocratic slave state is not an idea most are willing to consider.  After all, here in Amerika, the” land of the free and the home of the brave,” we have groceries full of food, vidi screens with plenty of games, sex and football, and plenty of paper Federal Reserve Notes.  Art has the power to function prophetically, capturing the truth of what is to come as it emerges from deep within the collective unconscious, and so I will give my thesis and prediction of the dystopian art.

But is this really how we live?  Are we really “free’?  What does it mean to be “free”?  In my estimation, the freedom most people are fooled into thinking they have is one of total relativism and moral ambivalence.  “Freedom,” somehow through Overton Window incrementalism, became synonymous with total relativism and meaninglessness.  But relativism and meaninglessness lead to nihilism and self-destruction.  This is the end result of not being able to use basic logic and reasoning.  The so-called “left” is a mass collective of mindless drones that work harder than anyone to ensure their own enslavement and annihilation.   When Lenin came to power, he executed the Czarists and  royals.  When Stalin came to power, he eliminated all the Leninists and Trotskyists.  When they were eliminated, Stalin then purged his own officers.  The watchers were watching the watchers, and it all imploded.  Now, our slave state has acquiesced to the same Sovietization, and will be run by the mindless left, all of whom are too foolish to understand that the regime they support is the very one that will destroy them.

While eugenics is a difficult issue for some, the left should understand that their adoption of eugenics and Fabian socialism is ultimately meant to kill them.  The “Wise Men” that run the Western establishment are not leftists, and in fact hate their drone underlings with a passion, and when the great culling arrives, after the opposition is attacked with the zombie “leftist” hordes, the system will turn against its henchman minion class. This is exactly what happened in the Soviet system, and all those hateful, godless professors out there should take note.  The “academic class” (I thought there were no class distinctions?) is not the class that will go into the future: they are slaves to a few thousand internationalists. Read more of this post

Filed under Books/Literature, Conspiracy, Culture, Economics, Esoteric/Speculation, Film Review/Analysis, History, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology/Sociology, Religion, Uncategorized, Video Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Big Trouble in Little China (1986) – Esoteric Analysis

March 25, 2012 3 Comments

"Have ya paid yer dues?"
"Yeah, the check's in the mail!"

By: Jay

 Big Trouble in Little China is another one of those goofy 80s films that you’re presently assuring yourself has no deeper relevance. You’re smugly saying, “Oh come on Jay, seriously? Another 80s esoteric analysis of something completely silly, like BTILC?” Well, dear reader, let me assure you of your error, and further promise to deliver juicy esoteric tidbits to sate your hunger as you journey on. Consider the opening scene that Fox mandated be added (where Egg Shen recounts the adventures of Jack Burton).  The actor is Jerry Hardin who played “Deep Throat” early on in the X-Files. Interestingly, the ambiguous government agent played here is similar to Deep Throat. What is also interesting is the obelisk on the desk behind him, initiating the viewer into what will be an occult journey.

Egg Shen reveals that the tale ahead will be one of Chinese “sorcery and black magic.” As proof, Egg Shen offers typical 80s blue lightning, of the Force variety. According to IMDB, the Chinese script in the beginning title sequence reads, “Evil spirits make a big scene in little spiritual state,” meaning the film will feature the primeval ancient religious tradition of the higher aeons or gods incarnating themselves in lower, visible, solid forms. This is almost universal in ancient cultures, from Greece and Rome, to China, and lends credence to the view that polytheism and monotheism come from a single religious tradition, as described in Genesis 1-12.

Note also that Egg Shen conceives of the usage of good and evil magic by both sides. Magic, in this view, may be used by the dark side and the light side, in what the dualistic scheme of most world religions views as the ultimate template for all reality. Eastern religions in particular have this dualistic focus, with the binary opposition never being transcended in this life, apart from “enlightenment” that results in some kind of dissolution or absolving into “pure being,” “thusness” or “nirvana,” or some state of being beyond the present world, which is often identified as “evil” and the domain of the fallen spirits and demons. The problem with this type of worldview is that it is self-defeating and contradictory. It claims to seek transcendence of the material and of all binary opposition, but its answer is to seek it in absolute impersonality. Since particularity and form in this world are the sources of “evil,” all particulars must dissolve. The result is monism and collectivism, and the history of eastern cultures demonstrates this enslavement clearly. Read more of this post

Filed under Comedy, Comedy Videos, Conspiracy, Culture, Esoteric/Speculation, Film Review/Analysis, Philosophy, Psychology/Sociology, Religion, Video Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Some Problems for the Ontological Argument: Metaphysical, Epistemic and Theological

May 7, 2011 5 Comments

 

The great chain of being.

By: Jay

(c) copyright 

The ontological argument of Anselm of Canterbury has long since captivated the minds of many philosophers and apologists. Not long after Anselm published his Proslogion, his devotional apologetic was criticized by Gaunilo, yet Anselm’s argument was taken up by many of the West’s most prominent thinkers, such as Descartes and Leibniz, both giving their own versions. One of the strongest arguments against Anselm would be Immanuel Kant’s, who centered his objection around the notion that “being” is not a predicate.1 The purpose of this paper will be to analyze other problems, particularly theological, metaphysical and epistemological problems in the classical Anselmian formulation.

Anselm’s argument simply stated is as follows:

And certainly this being so truly exists that it cannot even be thought not to exist. For something can be thought to exist that cannot be thought not to exist, and this is greater than that which cannot be thought not to exist. Hence, if that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-thought can be thought not to exist, then that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-thought is not the same as that-than-which-nothing-greater-can-be-thought, which is absurd. Something-than-which-a-greater-cannot-be-thought exists so truly then, that it cannot be even thought not to exist. And you, Lord our God, are this being.2

 

Plantinga gives the form of the argument as follows, arguing it is best formulated as a reductio ad absurdum argument:

 

  1. God exists in the understanding, but not in reality. (assumption for reductio)

  2. Existence in reality is greater than existence in the understanding alone. (premise)

  3. A being having all of God’s properties plus existence in reality can be conceived. (premise)

  4. A being having all of God’s properties plus existence in reality is greater than God. (from 1 and 2)

  5. A being greater than God cannot be conceived. (3,4)

  6. It is false that a being greater than God can be conceived. (by definition of ‘God.’)

  7. Hence it is false that God exists in the understanding but not in reality. (1-6 reductio ad absurdum).3 Read more of this post

Filed under Apologetics, Bible, Books/Literature, History, Philosophy, Religion, Theology Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Justin Martyr, Huxley and the Perennial Philosophy

July 11, 2010 4 Comments

By: Jay

Justin’s Hortatory Address is interesting. In it we see an apologetic for a convert from Greek philosophy and religion to early Roman Christianity. What is more interesting is the appeal to the so-called perennial philosophy as an apologetic defense against Greek polytheism. Many fathers cite the tradition that Pythagoras, Plato, Orpheus and Sibyl relate a tradition that comes from Egypt, not as paganism, but from Moses.  Indeed, this is very plausible, though discarded by moderns. The reason it’s discarded is that it presupposes the veracity of the biblical texts, particularly the Law and prophets, which were the first to be attacked by Luther’s reformation sons and daughters through higher criticism, through Satanically-inspired men like Julius Wellhausen.

Justin refers interestingly to The Timaeus as well, which I recently read, where an Egyptian priest relates to Solon, who then relates to Socrates, the ancient tradition of creation that is somewhat monotheistic. So we see that the ancient occult lineage of polytheism at places intertwines with the true monotheistic lineage as maintained by the prophets of the true God, but most strikingly, what emerges is that the Egyptian and Greek lineage of this “tradition” clearly become corrupted and introduce polytheism. The Timaeus does just this, introducing demiurges and co-creator gods along with God. Many scholars retrace this Egyptian period to Rameses II and the Hyksos, which may have been the period when Joseph ruled in Egypt.  This also raises interesting questions about Egyptian monotheism and the resurrection. It makes sense that, given the presence of the Jews in Egypt, the Egyptians would have adapted some of their doctrines, especially if Moses and Joseph had been among them and taught the doctrine of the one, true and pure religion. Read more of this post

Filed under Apologetics, Bible, Conspiracy, Culture, Esoteric/Speculation, History, Philosophy, Religion, Theology Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers