Jay’s Analysis Featured with Richard Hoagland and Jordan Maxwell

I’ll be sitting in on a round table Skype discussion Thursday evening, 7 p.m. PT, with well-known veteran conspiracy researchers Richard Hoagland and Jordan Maxwell, whom you’ve probably heard on Coast to Coast or seen on The History Channel.  We’ll be discussing the new papacy, the background to the resignation of Benedict and the events I described in my article, as well as possible deeper, darker intents by the modern, controlled Vatican.  I assume the discussion will be uploaded to YouTube to be posted here soon thereafter.

pope-show-banner

See the Project Camelot link here for more details.

Exclusive Report: Geo-politics and Recent Vatican Intrigues

The principal geo-political text under analysis, The Keys of This Blood

The principal geo-political text under analysis, The Keys of This Blood

By: Jay

Update: Rome’s Chief Exorcist Confirms This Analysis

With the recent shakeups in the arena of Catholicism and with several people messaging me asking for my perspective on what was happening, I thought I would give an analytical report based on my research and several years spent in Catholic circles of all flavors: traditionalist, liberal, etc.  Given that history, and given my own proclivities for comparative religion and the underground “scoop” (if you will) as it pertains to these groups, I feel competent to give a report.  I will not be taking a particular theological stance here: my focus will be primarily geo-political, especially since I recently finished Malachi Martin’s lengthy geo-political tome, The Keys of This Blood.  Another reason this is very relevant revolves around my own personal interest in the Cold War the last year.  With an ever-expanding library of such materials, I’ve decided to try to take a decade or so of Catholic research and combine it with recent forays into Sovietism, and condense it into this article.

Malachi Martin is a dubious figure.  Facts on his history can be researched on one’s own, but suffice to say I do view him as a consummate insider into Vatican affairs, particularly as relates to Vatican II, since he was a peritus of Cardinal Bea, a leading “liberal” at the Council, as well as being a personal friend of John XXIII and Paul VI (Martin, that is).  Martin was, at the time of the council, very clearly a theological liberal, positing several things in his early book The Encounter that are manifestly, from a classical Catholic perspective, modernist, as well as what might be considered “process theology.”  So my approach is not going to be flawed by what is often the uneducated stance taken by so many “traditionalists,” who cite Martin as some sort of “prophet” who was working to fight the changes in the institution. On the contrary, a thorough reading of his works (and I’ve read several of them), leads to the opposite conclusion.

Why, then, does Martin’s book matter?  Because it is a geo-political treatise that shows a clear insight into modern intrigues that most analysts overlook, miss, or are completely ignorant of.  In intelligence, media, and research analysis, this area is often garbled because of mass ignorance of Catholic theology and history.  I am not ignorant of Catholic theology and history.  I am also not a complete newbie when it comes to political intrigue and news analysis, so I intend in this article to highlight areas that are utterly missing in mainstream and alternative news perspectives.  Martin’s book matters because it offers predictions in 1990 (when it was written) that have since come true.  This alone shows the book has relevance, regardless of Martin’s dubious motives or questionable actions.

Aside from that, the book is full of spot-on geo-political analyses that match up with other well-known researchers and analysts that have been highlighted here and elsewhere.  For example, readers will notice that I have cited Joel Skousen’s analyses of strategic threats and the continuance of the threat of communism and Sovietism.  The chief thesis in that regard being that international communism did not suddenly disappear with the “fall of the Wall,” but instead took on an underground, covert stance.  It has continued to operate out of Moscow and other centers of Europe with the intention still of destroying the West.  One of those chief enemies in the West, from this perspective, is the Roman Catholic institution.  For worldwide atheistic communism or socialism or secular humanism to have the final victory, the West must be dismantled. Read more of this post

The Great Dystopian Mass Culling to Come

"Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses."

“Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses.”

You are now living in a dystopian science fiction movie

By: Jay

As I watch the classic science fiction films and read the novels, particularly the dystopian genre, it becomes evident that each one has its own piece of the puzzle for the coming future nightmare.  From 2001: A Space Odyssey to Soylent Green to 1984 to THX1138, these works of art give us insight into the coming zeitgeist.  The reality of a global technocratic slave state is not an idea most are willing to consider.  After all, here in Amerika, the” land of the free and the home of the brave,” we have groceries full of food, vidi screens with plenty of games, sex and football, and plenty of paper Federal Reserve Notes.  Art has the power to function prophetically, capturing the truth of what is to come as it emerges from deep within the collective unconscious, and so I will give my thesis and prediction of the dystopian art.

But is this really how we live?  Are we really “free’?  What does it mean to be “free”?  In my estimation, the freedom most people are fooled into thinking they have is one of total relativism and moral ambivalence.  “Freedom,” somehow through Overton Window incrementalism, became synonymous with total relativism and meaninglessness.  But relativism and meaninglessness lead to nihilism and self-destruction.  This is the end result of not being able to use basic logic and reasoning.  The so-called “left” is a mass collective of mindless drones that work harder than anyone to ensure their own enslavement and annihilation.   When Lenin came to power, he executed the Czarists and  royals.  When Stalin came to power, he eliminated all the Leninists and Trotskyists.  When they were eliminated, Stalin then purged his own officers.  The watchers were watching the watchers, and it all imploded.  Now, our slave state has acquiesced to the same Sovietization, and will be run by the mindless left, all of whom are too foolish to understand that the regime they support is the very one that will destroy them.

While eugenics is a difficult issue for some, the left should understand that their adoption of eugenics and Fabian socialism is ultimately meant to kill them.  The “Wise Men” that run the Western establishment are not leftists, and in fact hate their drone underlings with a passion, and when the great culling arrives, after the opposition is attacked with the zombie “leftist” hordes, the system will turn against its henchman minion class. This is exactly what happened in the Soviet system, and all those hateful, godless professors out there should take note.  The “academic class” (I thought there were no class distinctions?) is not the class that will go into the future: they are slaves to a few thousand internationalists. Read more of this post

Eyes Wide Shut (1999) – Esoteric Analysis

Mirror image film poster showing Nicole’s ‘open’ eye in the midst of sex: the characters’ inner pysches and problems are about to be mirrored in the ‘real’ world, as they realize they have been blind and ‘profane.’

By: Jay

Eyes Wide Shut is a film that failed to live to the expectations of many. It was supposed to be an edgy thriller that made statements about upper echelon decadence, while also utilizing the real world sex life of Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman as a kind of doorway bridging the gap between reality and fantasy – something that does come up in other Kubrick films, such as 2001: A Space Odyssey.  In this Kubrick film, however, we have a statement about who runs the “show.”  The show is both the film itself, as well as reality, and Kubrick wants viewers to realize that reality is run by our present showmasters of the videodrome. The viewer is supposed to reflect upon the decadence of the Eastern elite establishment, but also notice that viewing the film itself is homage to present social hypocrisy, since the film is a wannabe voyeuristic step into the sex lives of others. In this regard, it functions as an initiation. None of the other analysts and commenters have really noticed this. Virtually every review I have read sees it as some elaborate “MKULTRA/Illuminati” mind control thing (as is supposedly everything on those sites), while other reviews from professors and academia see it as a social or psychological commentary.

I think it has elements of all this, but the real goal is, I believe, an initiation process. The viewer is at the film because he or she is curious about Hollywood secrets and elite lives. Think of all the silly gossip magazines we have.  The “average Joe” went to see the film for a glimpse of Nicole Kidman, and Kubrick wants the viewer to see the hypocrisy in such an action, given that most people will “judge” the film’s secret society cult. Eyes Wide Shut, then, is a descriptor of the audience, as well as the characters in the film, who don’t really understand the socio-political power base that runs things. The power base is not, according to Kubrick’s film, the average politician or wealthy doctor or lawyer in New York.  Indeed, this is precisely Kidman and Cruise’s characters’ status: they are unwitting inductees. Thus throughout the film, the viewers eyes are wide shut to the reality of the power structure, just as Kidman and Cruise’s characters are, until the end, when they have their eyes “opened,” as they both say at the end. Let us proceed.

The opening scene shows us Mrs. Harford (Nicole Kidman) between two pillars. This is the doorway to the initiation, in other words. The two pillars figure prominently in Freemasonry as the entranceway to the divine, as borrowed from Solomon’s temple:

Nicole stands between two pillars – Jachin and Boaz, setting the initiatory tone for the film.

The two pillars of Freemasonry borrowed from Solomon’s Temple, indicating the doorway to the “mysteries”

The viewer is being told from the beginning that they are to undergo an initiation into how the “mysteries” and the secret societies work, particularly from a sociological perspective.  The Harfords, we discover, are having marital troubles related to sexual frustrations. It is also significant that it is Christmas time, when the initiatory procedure takes place, as a kind of anti-traditional religious/anti-Christian statement. It is also important to remember that all details in a Kubrick film are significant – the placement of everything is meaningful and deliberate.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers