“Our Destiny: Digital Nomads in a Virtual Void”

Slavegrid

David Richards
Infowars.com

November 12, 2010

Britain is a surreal place to be living right now.

The infamous Ministry of Defense trend report for 2007-35 projects the British middle classes ‘becoming revolutionary, taking on the role of Marx’s proletariat.’

I should be seeing the start of the ferment.

Our living standards are being attacked: people are losing their jobs, there is fast inflation, taxes are increasing and every year hordes of young people leave university to few job opportunities.

And yet there is virtually no anger at all. The conversation between people is as trivial and inane as ever.

Most social life in my town of 25,000 people is found in cafes and pubs. Primarily young mothers and housewives inhabit the cafes, while the pubs, charging £3 a pint, are now too expensive for most people to visit regularly.

Everyone else is locked indoors.

The streets are surprisingly subdued. I often take long walks lasting many hours and encounter few other souls. It is eerily quiet.

Even on a Friday night in Coventry, a City of 300,000 people nearby, the high street is surprisingly lifeless. The young are not out mixing and causing trouble as they should be.

When experiencing this shocking lack of activity and desire for life, you may wonder: Where is everyone?

Floating in cyber space.

They are at home gorging on limitless free TV shows, movies, songs and social networking. Their leisure time is spent engrossed in a fantastical ‘second life’.

Television is a tremendous tool of distraction. Internet is even more dangerous. It is a black hole of amusement that swallows people’s lives and destroys whole cultures.

It is why few will panic as Rome burns. Read more of this post

TSA Disrobe and Grope Kids and Elderly; Illegals & Awlaki Roam Free

Elderly white Al-Qaeda operatives discovered!

By: Jay

In a flurry of media attention directed at the absurd invasions of privacy by the TSA, scores of such abuses are now coming to the fore. The mass media has been forced to report on the issue, but will people now begin to realize the glaring contradictions in the Great and Holy Bureaucracy? By that, I am referring to the sick joke that is “terrorism,” amnesty and open borders.

The same establishment that actively works to give complete amnesty to illegals, provides assistance and aid through sanctuary cities, voter registration, college tuition, and various other exemptions, turns around and surveils, harasses and grabs the crotches and breasts of every American citizen who doesn’t want to be radiated in a huge naked body scanner. Nothing better exposes the fraud of the war on terror than this fact: if the bureaucracy was truly concerned about terrorists coming in and out of the country, there would be secured borders.

On top of all that, it is now known that Anwar al Awlaki dined at the Pentagon soon after the 9/11 attacks, as Fox reports. So let that sink in. The top man in Al-Qaeda is invited to the Pentagon–the mastermind responsible for all the recent airport mail “bombs,” Times Square Bombing, Fort Hood, and so forth was invited to, and dined at, the Pentagon after 9/11. And who is the focus of the searching and groping and DNA swabs at the airports? Young girls and elderly men. Even greater absurdity is the fact that no one is profiled, since that would not properly be multi-cultural, yet if Arabs really were the great threat, profiling would obviously make sense.

Instead, as the MIAC and Homeland Security reports showed, the focus of the massive domestic “security” apparatus is veterans, gun owners and conservatives–especially the evil “Ron Paul” types. So the focus is admittedly nothing to do with terrorists. It doesn’t just stop at old men and young girls: it also extends to young children–the dreaded three year-old Al-Qaeda operatives. There is absolutely no evidence or reason to suspect that American citizen’s children are a security threat, but that is not the real reason. A key factor that is ignored by the mainstream media is the psychological effect of such procedures, which are used to cull the populace into a herd mindset: that we are dehumanized cattle to be herded about as goons with badges get off on feeling everyone up. Read more of this post

Rove Says “Dem Apocalypse” Tuesday. Not Good Enough

Janus, the Roman god; otherwise known as the Neo-con/Democrat hybrid

By: Jay

Karl Rove writes in the Wall Street Journal that Tuesday will see an “apocalypse” of the Democratic Party. While that may be the case with regard to the standard party politics, it’s not good enough for the country. If we simply shove in a gaggle of neo-cons, all we will get is more of the same, minus slightly different rhetoric. If Gingrich runs for president in 2012, it will be more of the same, since Gingrich supports carbon taxes. And insert there as well Palin, Romney or Petraeus. Carbon tax is, of course, one of the key pillars of the present globalist-minded Washington establishment, and it has been totally discredited. And by establishment, I mean the mainline left and “right.” Gingrich is not a conservative, and Palin isn’t good enough. Many of the candidates presently running aren’t really conservative, either, but many are. Rand Paul represents the best among the candidates, as well as Sharron Angle, and it’s here that we can begin to see a step in the right direction.

Proof that they are legitimate is in the pudding – who does the mainline media go after relentlessly? Paul and Angle. While we are in the midst of depression, more proposed banker bailouts, more proposed government takeovers and nanny state control, do we really think a pile of neo-connery will save us? We shouldn’t. Most of the neo-con establishment backtracks and waffles as often as the Democrats they have stage play battles with. 

So what is the future trend? Like it or not, the future trend is the popularity of Ron Paul.  At CPAC this year, Paul annihilated Romney. Romney had, the prior year, edged out Paul, and a year later, Paul blows away Romney. If Republican Partiers want to survive, they should understand that it won’t work to shuffle in the same old hacks. In fact, if we get a new crop of neo-cons, it will signal a future apocalypse of the Republican Party. Perhaps this is a good thing. Like it or not, the trend is Ron Paul. 

The political zeitgeist is one of awakening, and the so-called conservatives are taking baby steps towards the right positions, but we must beware of falling into tribalism and drifting off to sleep, assuming our football team has beat the other team. That’s not good enough. A crop of neo-cons isn’t good enough. People are tired of the same old hacks–it’s like political Groundhog Day.  More quantitative easing, more inflation, more regulations, more big brother, and more bailouts only signal further destruction of the economy, and what is crucial to understand is that this destruction is by design, not by “inefficiency” and not by “stupidity.” This is the line the mainstream outlets continually sell, but it’s just not the case. Former chief economist of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, who leaked the facts in 2000 that this monetary apocalypse plan was by design, and it’s the same globalist banker crew that was among that ilk. This is what the neo-cons won’t talk about, and even Gary North at LewRockwell seems to be unaware of the fact that it was known to be an implosion by design.  Until we identify the real problem, solutions cannot be given. Thus, the future is not more neo-cons, but real conservatives.  Another influx of neo-cons will only wake people up further.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 158 other followers