Fractional Reserve Fiat Banking

Gold is the initial deposit, while paper notes function as the representative medium of exchange that can be expanded or contracted.

Gold is the initial deposit, while paper notes function as the representative medium of exchange that can be expanded or contracted.

By: Jay

Dr. Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown.  Quigley was the chronicler of the elite “Anglo-American Establishment,” as he titled it, having access to their provate records and archives.  His large tome Tragedy & Hope occupies an important place in the history of ideas, functioning as a modern history for insiders.  Though the book was published in 1966 with some controversy, it was republished in 1974, reportedly being given to CIA section chiefs as an explanation of why certain actions and operations were being carried out.

In other words, it might have occurred to some section chiefs in the 1970s, “Why are we funding both right wing and socialist movements?”  The answer is in Quigley’s Tragedy & Hope: The goal has never been some set ideology, but a world government under the auspices of “Democratic capitalism.” While Quigley’s book is a great insight, it is important to recognize that the book is an establishment apologia, written from the perspective of a classical Western progressive.  For Quigley, the track the West had taken the last several hundred years was both good and bad, but largely good, as he proposes the thesis that western-progressive-democratic-capitalist-scientism was a great, noble and ultimately quasi-Christian development that would usher in a world federation of the best hoped possibilities.

In this regard, Quigley was way off, if not openly deceptive, and terribly ignorant in terms of religion. This is evident to any knowledgable theologian, but for the more practically minded “officials” for whom the book was written, it probably served its purpose.  Dr. Quigley naively seems to think that the Anglo-American establishment truly wants the best for humanity, but his book never mentions the cryptocracy.  For him, the assumptions are the same as the rest of post-enlightenment western liberalism: men are basically good, and seek the betterment of mankind when properly educated.  Of course, the 20th century alone should be enough to convince anyone with half a brain that humans are self-seeking and self-destructive.  In his first few chapters he even sets the stage for modern history being developed on the basis of 19th century notions of the non-existence of evil.  Read more of this post

Casino Royale (2006) – 9/11 Connections and Esoteric Analysis

Lesser known Casino Royale poster.

Lesser known Casino Royale poster.

By: Jay

The reboot of Bond with Casino Royale in 2006 marked a new era for the now second biggest film legacy in history (now surpassed by Harry Potter).  Bond was revamped in a new, slick way, beginning with the first of Ian Fleming’s stories, Casino Royale.  The film differs slightly from the novel, but only in details.  However, the esoteric associations and “conspiratorial” elements have changed, coming more into line with an overall archetypal narrative that is evident in the three newest Bonds.  Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace, and Skyfall, are replete with alchemical and death-burial-resurrection motifs.  This differs from the novels, which are more simplistic, although the novel Casino Royale does mention Manichaean dualism.

Casino Royale is about Bond’s transformation from a standard agent into a heartless killer.  The film begins with a flashback to Bond attaining “00″ status, meaning he has killed twice.  In a way, the entrance into Bond’s full-fledged assassin status functions as his initiation.  Indeed, the three films function as a process of Bond’s own psyche being alchemically “purified” to let go of all his attachments, attaining what might be called in the Greek ascetic tradition, apatheia.  The dross of Bond’s desire for a woman to complete him is his weakness in Casino Royale.  Bond has killed twice and made “00,” but he still desires emotional fulfillment in the opposite sex.  But in M’s mind, Bond must learn a crucial lesson: he cannot trust anyone, not even her.

Thus, Bond’s “00″ status was attained through the ritual sacrifice of two criminals, leading to the confrontation of Bond’s own internal weakness: his shade, embodied in LeChiffre, and ultimately in Vesper Lynd.  In this way, we see yet another link between the world of secret intelligence work and the religio-mystical-esoteric as has often been mentioned in my essays: Not only do both traffic in hermetic information, both are structured hierarchically to include grades and degrees that one ascends after various tests, trials, and sacrifices.  Just as a hierophant was once a neophyte, so too must Bond ascend from the role of agent to “00,” reporting to his “Mum,” the enigmatic and matronly M, played by Dame Judi Dench.  If anyone doubts this, recall that Ian Fleming was steeped in esoterism and comparative religion, as well as running numerous intelligence operati0ns for the British Naval Psy Op division.  Ian MacIntyre in For Your Eyes Only and Philip Gardiner in The Bond Code delve into these issue in more depth for those interested.

Following the introductory montage of Bond and a lot of playing cards, LeChiffre is shown funding “freedom fighters” in Uganda.  Presumably these are communistic freedom fighters, as the history of such movements in Africa and Latin America were associated with Soviet support.  This does fit with the novel’s picture of LeChiffre, since LeChiffre worked for SMERSH, the Soviet anti-spy agency.  I wrote concerning LeChiffre in my Casino Royale novel analysis:

Mads Mikkelsen plays LeChiffre, with the bleeding left eye.

Mads Mikkelsen plays LeChiffre, with the bleeding left eye.

“In the beginning, however, Bond is not after SMERSH, but a wealthy, disfigured rogue who stuck out on his own and created a “fifth column” from SMERSH, named LeChiffre.  LeChiffre translates as “the cypher,” letting us know more is at work here.  LeChiffre, according to Bond writer Ian MacIntyre, was based on British Satanist/occultist Aleister Crowley. Read more of this post

The Process of Your Philosophical Awakening (Audio)

So what is beyond the realm of “conspiracy”? Is that the bottom of the rabbit hole? Does it go deeper? What about religion? Is there a connection between awakening to things like the “new world order” and deeper issues like religion? Is philosophy useful, or just the playground of nerds? How do contemporary politics and issues lead one out of the maze and psychological prison of relativism and being programmed by the system, up to the contemplation of existence and reality itself, and ultimately, God? In this discussion, I outline my views on these questions, explaining how questioning reality and how the world works leads to the biggest questions of all, and why this is beneficial. Most people don’t attempt to relate or connect the questions of philosophy and conspiracy, so come together, let’s reason, and let’s walk out of the cave of appearances into the real world of sunlight.

 

JaysAnalysis Interviews Comedian Chris Crofton

A picture of the comedian, Chris Crofton.

A picture of the comedian, Chris Crofton.

Jay’s Analysis was fortunate enough to interview Nashville comedian Christ Crofton. In this laffy interview, Chris sounds off on a host of issues, including the Obama administration and its track record, American idiocracy and indifference, the NSA spying, the ongoing state of war, Bill Hicks, East Nashville hipsterism, standup comedy, and his own best and worst experiences as a professional comedian.

Chris Crofton is aptly called “a comic’s comic.” He has done standup in clubs nationwide and opened for comic greats, Louie CK and Bob Odenkirk, as well as appearing in Harmony Korine’s “Trash Humpers.” Chris presently hosts the Chris Crofton Show.

Check out The Chris Crofton Show here.

To download the MP3,

Right Click and “Save As”

Check out Jay’s Analysis’ other interviews here.

Bilderberg Group’s Transhumanist Corporate Communism

Bilderberg 2013 will meet at the Grove Hotel in Watford, UK

Bilderberg 2013 will meet at the Grove Hotel in Watford, UK

By: Jay

The elusive, secretive Bilderberger Group is set to meet this week in Watford, England with plans to reportedly hand the “baton” of leadership on to Google.  I recall back in 1999 first reading about the Bilderberg Group on an obscure conspiracy site now long gone.   At that time, if you mentioned the Bilderberg Group or other leftist elite combines, you were considered insane.  Indeed, even a few years ago, major news and so-called “conservative” news refused to mention Bilderberg, with neo-con talkmongers cowering to what they falsely consider capitalism.  While it may be considered a good sign that Bilderberg is now appearing in mainstream news due to sites like Drudge and Infowars forcing the elite entity into public view, Bilderberg is still able to hide behind a mask of so-called capitalism.

When a football star goes to a strip club, it’s the top news story for a week: when the heads of international banking, government and industry meet in private with future candidates like Bill Clinton or Barack Obama, it’s a media blackout, replete with scoffs and mockery when Bilderberg is mentioned.  What generally occurs when large secretive cabals are exposed to the spotlight of public scrutiny is that the entity takes on a less formative role, continuing to function as a kind of debating society, while larger power plays are made at newer, secretive meetings.  As longtime Bilderberg researcher Daniel Estulin has shown in his excellent The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, and in recent interviews, Bilderberg nowadays is now more of an errand gopher meeting of the global elite, while still retaining an important function. Read more of this post

Science Confirms We Fringe: Who Runs the World?

Look, see how the globe is become a pretty shiny ball of progress through innernetz!

Look, see how the globe is become a pretty shiny ball of progress through innernetz!

But the “elite” TED speaker still can’t use the “C” word (not cunt)

By: Jay

First, watch the TEDtalk lecture at the bottom, “James Glattfelder: Who Runs the World?”  If you recall, this study mentioned in the below lecture was going around the web, especially on “conspiracy” sites, a year or so ago.  What the study shows is the relationship between the ownership of shareholders and corporate networks.  Now, while you think we live in a “free market” system under capitalism, the study shows we absolutely do not.  In fact, this interpretation of the data is the siren song we fringe thinkers and researchers have been saying for years.  The speaker is right that perhaps the international data in relations to systems analysis has not been analyzed before, but his conclusions are old hat to us in the reality community.

The conclusion is that the transnationalist entities are linked and basically run the world.  The influence of the shareholders amounts to running the planet through maintaining the controlling shares of the top companies.  146 top players thus can control half the world’s wealth and resources.  To point this out is not “communism,” since I have shown numerous times that “communism” and “socialism” are not real movements, though the anti-establishment energy they channel is very real.  Communism and socialism are control mechanisms to divert anti-establishment furor into movements controlled by the transnationalist/globalist interests the TED talk speaker mentions at the bottom.  The speaker also fails to mention that all these top “TNCs” are behind the speakers who frequently appear on TED talks, like Bill Gates and Al Gore.

But keep in mind, they are not capitalists.  Capitalism always takes the blame for the machinations of entities that want to stamp it out.  These entities are not, strictly speaking, socialist, either.  Gore and Gates, for example, are billionaire monopoly capitalists that openly intend on imposing a Fabian technocratic socialism for the masses, while ensuring privatization for those at the top.  For the bottom 99%, regulations, laws, rules and bureaucratic red tape are marshaled to shut down any and all competition, while those at the top are above any and all laws.  In essence, we are under the worst system imaginable for 99% of the globe.  99% of the populace still cannot figure out that their whole spectrum of existence has been weaponized to rid them from the face of the earth.  Even the TED talk pseudo elites are unable to figure out the British model of divide and conquer eugenics that still runs the world.  I have tried and tried and tried to hammer this home to friends and readers, yet few have caught on and prefer the Matrix.

The corporations the speaker mentions are actually the source of the modern Green Movement, originally an “anti-capitalist” strand of communism that descends from Marx and Engels who were the first to write about the supposed “alienation” of man from nature through technology and private ownership of property.  A connection can also be made here to Darwin, since Marxism was based partly on partly Darwinism, yet minus the Anglo racial superiority.  The “alienation” of man from a state of pure nature and equalitarianism was supposed to be reconciled through the proletarian revolution, leading to the stage of universal state communism prior to libertarian freedom through the withering away of the state (in classical Marxism).  However, in our day all of this has morphed into the monstrosity we see today: corporate socialism, or fascism.  There are no longer any nation sates, only subsidiaries of the Tyrell Corporation and the Umbrella Corporation. Read more of this post

JaysAnalysis Interviews Dooms Chapel Horror Director John Holt

It is, in fact, coming...

It is, in fact, coming…

I was able to track down The Dooms Chapel Horror director, John Holt for an interview, since he was filming locally.  In the interview, we discuss the evolution from the short film to the production, his own ideas and tastes, as well as my own pitch to create a horror film about the life of Stanley Kubrick – as a werewolf.  Fun interview!

To Download the Interview

Right Click and “Save As”

Follow The Dooms Chapel Horror on Facebook here

On Twitter here

Check out JaysAnalysis’ other interviews here!

The Apotheosis of the Stupid

Your local manager.

Your local manager.

By: Jay

An educated person in America operates under the duress of a constant and perpetual disconnect.  I don’t mean a person who was pilched for $70k for a slip of paper from some socialist state school, or even a framed slip from some “elite” private school, since the educational format is essentially standardized in this country.  I mean people who have an education.  Foreign bloggers and writers that peruse my site often show wonderment, commenting that “if this guy was in another country, he would be hailed as a great thinker.”  But alas, I am in the midst of a land (o lakes) that is hell-bent on a plaid-speed (to quote Spaceballs) path to disintegration and self-destruction.  For me, the most shocking revelation of my experience in higher education was the realization that stupidity is the path to sainthood in modernity.  People who learn how to learn, or later in life attempt to learn a classical formulation of education, replete with critical thinking, are the new devils.

IQ is supposed to be an indicator of future potential and success, but what happens when IQ becomes a threat?  It has long been said that only intelligence can recognize intelligence, so when the mass populace is dumbed down, the cumulative effect upon the literati is even worse.  My controversial thesis as you may guess, is that this is by design.  It was not designed by the hordes of hobgoblin heifers that haunt the gaunt halls of public education, but by social engineers decades ago, who egalitarian theories are already long debunked.  Somehow, total lies became the norm, and when one discusses these issues with a baby-boomer, the only reaction is disdain and the canned “grow up and get a job” line.  Well, growing  up presumably means understanding the system and acting accordingly, which none of the boomers seem able to do.  But reality has a funny way of coming back to attack you, like a thief in the night, and the baby boomers’ denials of reality are now beginning to come to full fruition.  Read more of this post

Romanian Writer Ninel Ganea Interviews Jay’s Analysis, Pt 3

The centralized control grid of monopoly capitalism.

The centralized control grid of monopoly capitalism.

Romanian writer, philosopher, and member of the Von Mises Institute, Ninel Ganea interviewed me concerning my own thoughts surrounding a variety of issues.  Ninel runs Karamazov.ro  and is posting the interview in 3 installments.  Below is part 3.

Part 1 here

Part 2 here

What is the philosophical/economical/esoteric argument for reduction of the population? We see all the powers that be (Club of Rome, for example) obsessed with this issue.

For those who adhere to the “left-hand path” as they term it, it is the natural order of things. In that perspective, at least for those that are high level occultists, the goal of esoterism is godhood, and the path to godhood necessarily involves the destruction of those that are in opposition. It is all viewed in alchemical terms, so the forces of chaos, disorder and destruction are viewed as a kind of technology that leads to progress. One can see this in the revolutionary notion of necessary evil where something like the French Revolution was a good, since the bloodshed and chaos led to the outbreak of other revolutions and “progress.”

Alchemically, the idea is that the Great Work had progressed through destruction, and the Great Work is the deification of man through the long process of history. In this view, technology and transhumanism are the means to that godhood that will be the purification of base metals into gold: immortality through Promethean, rationalist means instead of through God. On another level, some of those occultists would see the death of the masses as a fulfillment of the Crowleyan dictum, “the slaves shall serve.” Or, the slaves shall die, actually. The masses, in this view, are sacrificed because they are precisely what holds back progress. Their sacrifice must be accomplished so that the elite may leap forward. Darwin, Marx and Mao all had the same idea that destruction is a form of creation. Incidentally, this is what Graham Greene says in The Destroyers, as quoted by Donnie in Donnie Darko.

Do you see any fracture between traditional monarchies and the modern political regimes? How do you rate Prince Charles conservative tendencies in this context?

The revolutions from 1789 onwards effectively wiped out the outward face of the monarchs, with the British monarchy retaining its somewhat public power, and without a doubt the Queen of England and her house retain a lot of power, despite many people mistakenly thinking they are mere figureheads. I think the revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries were a mixed bag: are we really better off going into a technocratic slave state than having monarchies? I also suspect that the royal houses are still very powerful, but from behind the scenes.

Queen Beatrix and Bilderberg is a good example, but a lot of people are unaware that the European black nobility are powerful and do have elite meetings in Malta, for example, though I don’t want to really delve into the generally goofy Jesuit/Malta conspiracies. If one is interested, histories of MI6 sometimes discuss Malta and its use in this regard. As to what degree the monarchs, royal families and black nobility intersect with modern republics and political regimes, I am probably not well educated enough on the topic to speak knowledgeably. Much of what Fritz Springmeier has written in Bloodlines of the Illuminati does tend to be verified. Read more of this post

Romanian Writer Ninel Ganea Interviews Jay’s Analysis, Pt 2

Adam and Eve become empiricists.

Adam and Eve become empiricists.

Romanian writer, philosopher, and member of the Von Mises Institute, Ninel Ganea interviewed me concerning my own thoughts surrounding a variety of issues.  Ninel runs Karamazov.ro  and is posting the interview in 3 installments.  Below is part 2.

Part 1 here

Part 3 here

You mentioned somewhere you were in between Orthodox Judaism and Eastern Christianity. Can you tell us what some of the strong and the weak points in these traditions?

These are complicated issues, but being raised with an interest in church and having a long interest in biblical theology, the Torah, prophets and wisdom literature had a profound effect on me. In my long religious trek, I basically got the point where I felt that there could be a divide with the Law and the New Testament. I’m the kind of person that is willing to question my own assumptions constantly, so I was willing to take a look at Judaism, especially since there is a close connect between the Kabbalistic view of the sephiroth and the Eastern Orthodox view of the divine energies. They are essentially describing the same things.

I branched out into reading Maimonides and modern Jewish writers, as well as looking at comparative liturgies. I also and found a lot of challenging material in Dr. Philip Sherrard, Maximos Confessor and Fr. John Romanides that led me to again look at the issue of Neo-platonism and the Trinity. The question that arose for me was, is this all derived from Hellenism? I’m not saying I have the answer to all that, I’m just saying what arose in my mind. At what point is the New Testament a radical departure from the Torah? How much continuity is there, really? I basically took these matters on for myself.

More recently, I’ve reexamined a lot of St. Maximos Confessor’s works, which have a lot of parallels with the kabbalists in regard to the macrocosm-mircocosm view he takes of the Incarnation. There is a strong argument to be made here for his view of the necessity of the logoi being unified in the Logos. This would actually solve a lot of philosophical and theological issues. There is a really good scholarly article by Stephen Clark on this titled “Maximus Confessor: Logos and Logoi,” that gets into this issue. I certainly think the Eastern view makes more sense than the Latin view, especially in terms of eschatology.

How do you explain the still living presence of the philosophy of empiricism although it has been discredited many times?

My university advisor used to comment on that frequently. I had several courses that dealt with phenomenology and Husserl is said to have lamented that naïve empiricism can never be killed. It seems to be immortal like a vampire, no matter how many times you kill it. The sophists existed in Plato’s time, and they exist still, and will continue. The reason for this in my analysis is simply the fall of man. Relativism is the end result of empiricism, which is ultimately what Adam and Even opted for in Genesis. Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 160 other followers