Western Support for Communism: CFR, OSS, Soviets and Asia

Communist and fascist posters evidence the same propaganda tactics.

Communist and fascist posters evidence the same propaganda tactics.

Full Spectrum Dominance in the Anglo-American Great Game

By: Jay

It is often stated in “conspiracy circles” so-called that the Western elites help train and put Mao in power.  Is this true?  Can we find documented evidence for the claim? If so, it would put a lot of modern “conservative” and “libertarian” analyses in perspective.  In my experience, the so-called “conspiracy” sites and alternative media outlets are far more reliable (for all their shortcomings), as anyone with any sense knows, than the mainstream media, that retarded organ of Government, Inc.  Those that want to live in the Matrix can stay in the Matrix.

For those who want to know the real world, several factors are worth analyzing in regard to this question.  First, the CIA (preceded by the OSS) was set up as a result of the National Security Act of 1947 under Franklin D. Roosevelt, springing in part from the Pratt House in New York (future home of the Council on Foreign Relations), itself modelled from the British Secret Intelligence Service.  Likewise, the over-arching institutions that control and run the intelligence agencies in the West, like the Council on Foreign Relations, were modelled on the Oxford Round Table Groups and the Royal Institute for International Affairs.  Indeed, the Pratt House’s British counterpart was the Chatham House.  We read from the Council on Foreign Relation’s site as follows:

‘The Council’s home on East 65th Street, so grand when acquired after the Wall Street crash, was proving hopelessly inadequate for these expansions. In 1944 the widow of Harold Irving Pratt, a director of Standard Oil of New Jersey and a faithful Council member since 1923, donated the family’s four-story mansion, at the southwest corner of 68th Street and Park Avenue, for the Council’s use. (In keeping with a prevailing reverse snobbery, the address and front door were on the side street, not the more showy avenue.) John D. Rockefeller, Jr., led a slate of 200 members and companies who volunteered funds to convert the gracious residence into offices, meeting rooms, and an institutional library. When the Council moved into its new quarters in April 1945, Secretary of State Edward Stettinius, a member since 1938, came to New York, “to bear witness [he said], as every Secretary of State during the past quarter of a century, to the great services and influence of this organization in spreading knowledge and understanding of the issues of United States foreign policy.”

In regard to the Pratt House and OSS one should note the prominent position of Allen Dulles in moving from the OSS to the CFR.  Also important is the transition of US foreign policy from “isolationist” or perhaps non-interventionist, to openly imperial engine for the Anglo-American establishment: Read more of this post

The Great Dystopian Mass Culling to Come

"Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses."

“Blessings of the State, Blessings of the Masses.”

You are now living in a dystopian science fiction movie

By: Jay

As I watch the classic science fiction films and read the novels, particularly the dystopian genre, it becomes evident that each one has its own piece of the puzzle for the coming future nightmare.  From 2001: A Space Odyssey to Soylent Green to 1984 to THX1138, these works of art give us insight into the coming zeitgeist.  The reality of a global technocratic slave state is not an idea most are willing to consider.  After all, here in Amerika, the” land of the free and the home of the brave,” we have groceries full of food, vidi screens with plenty of games, sex and football, and plenty of paper Federal Reserve Notes.  Art has the power to function prophetically, capturing the truth of what is to come as it emerges from deep within the collective unconscious, and so I will give my thesis and prediction of the dystopian art.

But is this really how we live?  Are we really “free’?  What does it mean to be “free”?  In my estimation, the freedom most people are fooled into thinking they have is one of total relativism and moral ambivalence.  “Freedom,” somehow through Overton Window incrementalism, became synonymous with total relativism and meaninglessness.  But relativism and meaninglessness lead to nihilism and self-destruction.  This is the end result of not being able to use basic logic and reasoning.  The so-called “left” is a mass collective of mindless drones that work harder than anyone to ensure their own enslavement and annihilation.   When Lenin came to power, he executed the Czarists and  royals.  When Stalin came to power, he eliminated all the Leninists and Trotskyists.  When they were eliminated, Stalin then purged his own officers.  The watchers were watching the watchers, and it all imploded.  Now, our slave state has acquiesced to the same Sovietization, and will be run by the mindless left, all of whom are too foolish to understand that the regime they support is the very one that will destroy them.

While eugenics is a difficult issue for some, the left should understand that their adoption of eugenics and Fabian socialism is ultimately meant to kill them.  The “Wise Men” that run the Western establishment are not leftists, and in fact hate their drone underlings with a passion, and when the great culling arrives, after the opposition is attacked with the zombie “leftist” hordes, the system will turn against its henchman minion class. This is exactly what happened in the Soviet system, and all those hateful, godless professors out there should take note.  The “academic class” (I thought there were no class distinctions?) is not the class that will go into the future: they are slaves to a few thousand internationalists. Read more of this post

Jay’s Analysis Vindicated by Veteran CIA Analyst

Algierian and Mali intrigues.

Algierian and Mali intrigues.

By: Jay

A few weeks ago I wrote about how the events in Libya, Mail and Algiers were engineered false flags, citing recent works I had read like Mark Curtis’ Secret Affairs and Stephen Dorril’s MI6 that provide ample scholarly evidence for staged crises and the manipulation of various Middle Eastern intrigues by various intelligence agencies.  Since I still get a good bit of criticism and opposition, I am citing this as an instance of vindication. In that article, I wrote:

“We are now seeing the manifestation of the black budget above as the biometric ID tracking and the special/black operations.  Libya, Mali and now Algiers are the present targets of the proxy wars, false flag terror and now the intelligence-run hostage crisis that is currently plastering the news media.  This is the Anglo establishment moving their forces into Russian controlled areas through proxy wars.  The key to these operations is intelligence and media propaganda that attempts to give rise to justified invasion.  Researchers and analysts have known for several years these operations were in the works for Africa by Africom.  This also gives justification for the implementation of biometric ID tracking, since the auspice is tracking “bad guys.”

In a recent talk given at the Brookings Institute, 30 year CIA veteran Bruce Riedel spoke about the DSR and the use of “false flags” and other tactics in controlling Al Qaeda and its shoot offs: Read more of this post

Close Encounters of the Third kind – Esoteric Analysis

Film poster with pyramidal image of road leading to the light at the top.

Film poster with pyramidal image of road leading to the light at the top.

By: Jay

Spielberg is in several senses, a master.  His 80s films constitute part of the very essence of what it was to grow up as a child of the 80s like myself.  Those of you who did have a keen sense for that 80s “feel” – a decade when it seemed simpler.  Reagan was a good guy leading the free West against a godless empire of commies and atheists, while yuppies could found businesses, and Jacko burned his curls at Pepsi-funded mega-concerts.  In the midst of this milder pop culture was a series of Spielberg and Lucas films, from Star Wars to Indiana Jones to Back to the Future that made the 80s even more enjoyable.  I recently did an analysis of Raiders of the Lost Ark, noting the esoteric elements found within, and this time we are going to look at that late 70s (1977) gateway to the 80s that was Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

One crucial element I’ve noticed in both E.T. and Close Encounters is a deeper esoteric theme that has been overlooked in all the analyses I’ve seen so far: the nature of symbols, language and communication.  This will become clearer as we progress.  As the film begins, we are shown mysterious ships that appear in the desert, the French scientist and the cartographer interview an old Mongolian man who says of the UFOs that “the sun came out and sang.”  There was a direct connection between the entities and music or sound, and they are directly connected with the sun.   Simultaneously, across the globe in India Hindu pilgrims and yogis had gathered to sing to the entities during the daylight, “Ah yah, Ah yah ye.”  This is close to the Tetragrammaton, the sacred Name of God in Scripture: Spielberg may be making a direct connection to the entities and the biblical notion of God as Lord Zbaoth, Lord of Hosts. In this instance, however, the “hosts” appear to be closer to the gods, possibly as demons or angelic.  Note also that over the old man is the Star of David, a symbol that would be very familiar to Spielberg.

Simulacrum.

Simulacrum.

When the “aliens” arrive at Barry’s house, what happens is more in line with supernatural phenomena surrounding the multitudinous accounts of possession.  Strange occurences like electrical disturbances and electronics going haywire mark their arrival, and it’s worth noting that the police cars, airplane and trucks go haywire, running in circles.  Immediately following the Barry scene, we are shown Roy and his son doing fractions over the family train set.  Roy, we notice, has this fascination with models and miniature versions of things.  In symbology or semiotics (which is key to unlocking Close Encounters and E.T.), the connection of a smaller image, icon or model with the thing itself is simulacra.

"33"

“33″

In semiotics, particularly in Plato’s Sophist, simulacrum is intended to fool the viewer into thinking the copy is the real thing.  The copy takes on a life of its own, yet viewed in scale it would clearly appear that the copy is not real.  This is a perfect analogy for the nature of film itself, as well as the role of the director.  The writer and/or film director is creating a simulacra of the real world with models and pictures, piecing and placing them together in a certain way, just as Roy does with the model train and city he has built. One may think of the simulated beings in Blade Runner or the simulated world of The Matrix here. Spielberg has mastered this art of simulation, and is presenting a simulated reality world – that of UFO-invaded America that is intended to produce a certain effect in the population.  Can this be taken to a larger scale, to which Spielberg and the director himself is a “toy” of the larger, galactic forces or entities of the cosmos?  Are we a Greek scale of being, being “played” and “directed” by the celestial hierarchy? Read more of this post

How the World Really Works, Pt. 1: The MI6 Model

The present book under anaklysis.

The present book under analysis.

By: Jay

For those who enjoy the subject matter in my analysis, Stephen Dorril’s MI6 is often referenced, recommended and cited as a prime example of real-world intrigue.  It’s functions as a window into how the West has operated geo-politically the last one hundred years, during the two great wars, the Cold War, and into the modern era of the “war on terrorism” so-called.  The book was published in 2002, so it’s also not that out of date, and since its publication, Mark Curtis’ 2010 Secret Affairs has also been published vindicating much of Dorril’s analysis.  Dorril’s book can be seen as a lengthier, massive version of the material in Curtis’ book, with Secret Affairs focusing on the West’s utilization of radical Islam.  Curtis is also a former LSE graduate and Royal Institute research fellow.  Dorril is also a professor and intelligence researcher, as well as a BBC consultant.  The point being, neither of these authors are “conspiratorial” in their approach.  While both might be said to be probably somewhat “left” in their analysis, the presentation in both are attempts at factual analysis.

The purpose of this article?  To shut the mouths of the countless idiots and lazy intellectuals that sit back offering endless criticism and don’t read or know about any of this.  Do I really care? No, but it’s fun to make mincemeat of the pseudo-intellectuals that sit back as armchair philosophers and critics that don’t read jack shit about jack shit, but feel the need to correct me in every possible way.  You see, it’s “bad” to read books on a multitude of subjects – it’s bad to be interested in geo-politics.  What you’re supposed to do is get married, get screwed over by your fat wife, then get screwed by some vulturous corporation after 40 years of servile servitude, and then proceed to your early grave through orderly euthanasia by the stategod, should you be allowed to live that long, after all your cancer-causing vaccines, Soviet-fluoridated water and GMO foods.  I’ll gladly take the gadfly mantle of “failure” by this ridiculous “society.”  When this all converts to the automatic technocratic technocracy, what some boomer thinks in 2012 will be on no one’s mind, other than for a good laugh.  To other detractors and critics who complain that this blog is not written for a mass audience, no it isn’t.  This is supposed to be the “real world” isn’t it?  Grow up and read a book. Read more of this post

On Evil, Intrigue and the Left

Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

By: Jay

It is often the case that detractors, opponents and skeptics will themselves latch onto a catchphrase or cliché statement about “how the world really works” in order to debunk the claims of anyone who challenges the mainstream account of events.  For them, “conspiracy theorists” will read everything as a conspiracy.  Ironically, the forebears of modern leftists were themselves the ones who asked questions about the status quo of their day, but as one learns in the study of paradigms and worldviews, the new opinions become the new dogmas.  As Foucault correctly explained, the modern world did not rid itself of hierarchy, “shepherds” and authority: it merely exchanged the old ones for a new.

Not all truths are to be told to all men, and not all people are sufficiently mature to deal with the harsh realities of realpolitik.  The fact remains that men are easily duped and fooled.  The system knows this, and thus statecraft is based largely on psychology and social engineering.  Guided by pragmatism, this idea is ancient, but Machiavelli is a great example.  For Machiavelli, statecraft was precisely the ability to manage intrigue.  And the reality is, it is much more this than ideology that guides men and nations.  In his Art of War, Machiavelli writes of the corruption of the military industrial complex of his day:

“But because military institutions have become completely corrupt and far removed from the ancient ways, these sinister opinions have arisen which make the military hated and intercourse with those who train them avoided. And I, judging, by what I have seen and read, that it is not impossible to restore its ancient ways and return some form of past virtue to it, have decided not to let this leisure time of mine pass without doing something, to write what I know of the art of war, to the satisfaction of those who are lovers of the ancient deeds. And although it requires courage to treat of those matters of which others have made a profession, none the less, I do not believe that it is a mistake to occupy a position with words, which may, with greater presumption, have been occupied with deeds; for the errors which I should make in writing can be corrected without injury to anyone, but those which are made with deeds cannot be found out except by the ruin of the Commanders.” Read more of this post

Cultural Marxism, Modern Art and Hipsterism

Sadly, Bauhaus was not just a band, but a hideous communist architecture style that likely bombarded your senses when you were in college.

Sadly, Bauhaus was not just a band, but a hideous communist architecture style that likely bombarded your senses when you were in college.

By: Jay

It is a frequently misunderstood notion that “modern” and “abstract” art was an organic development that arose from grassroots battles against “oppression” and the “folk art” of the lower classes. In fact, ugly, degenerate art arose from Soviet and communist circles as a means to attack aesthetic beauty. I often remark that “Bauhaus” architecture is communist to the surprise of listeners, but the facts are, “modern art” is almost wholly a communist and Soviet invention of weaponized culture.

To understand this, one must look at the Frankfurt School of Marxism, tasked primarily with social engineering and destroying culture. Weaponized culture was a key tool for destroying the West’s social values and social structure. This is also true of the modern transformations of “art” into its own internal nihilist critique of meaning itself, with hipsterism. Hipsterism could accurately be called the full blossoming of Theodore Adorno’s critical theory, particularly in terms of music. Adorno writes:

What radical music perceives is the untransfigured suffering of man…. The seismographic registration of traumatic shock becomes, at the same time, the technical structural law of music. It forbids continuity and development. Musical language is polarized according to its extreme; towards gestures of shock resembling bodily convulsions on the one hand, and on the other towards a crystalline standstill of a human being whom anxiety causes to freeze in her tracks…. Modern music sees absolute oblivion as its goal. It is the surviving message of despair from the shipwrecked.”

So modern music is geared towards the breakdown of order, beauty, form and meaning, waging a war on all the elements with the intent of disorienting man’s psyche and breaking down his worldview.  In fact Adorno describes it as an attempt at actually causing mania: Read more of this post

Jay’s Analysis Tops Reddit’s Hot Philosophy Trend

A big thanks to readers out there who prompted Jay’s Analysis to top the philosophy trends section for almost two days, consistently beating out Peter Singer and David Chamlers, two of the world’s top philosophers.  Reddit’s philosophy trend has 109,000 followers and garnered a lot of attention for the article I wrote last year, “Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Dostoyevsky Versus the Enlightenment Mythos.”

The Reddit trend brought almost 10,000 viewers in a 24-48 hour span.

The Reddit trend brought almost 10,000 viewers in a 24-48 hour span: a high number for a phiolosophy article.

Spread the word!

World War Z Secrets Leaked

Apocalypticism, Republiconmunism and Race-specific Bio-Weapons

All aboard!  Here's your passport to republican utopia!

All aboard! Here’s your passport to republican utopia!

By: Jay

For a long time I’ve held back on my actual thoughts on things, but nowadays I could care less. The actual operation of the entire society has become so absurd, backward, and irrational that it is now comical. For those aware, it is quite evident there is a long term plan to re-engineer and reorganize the western world in particular. The modern world is under the delusion that it has been freed from the prison of “superstition” and “dogma”: Altar and throne have been overthrown and now the “New Man” can arise from the ash heap of millennia of “dark ages” and oppression. Modernity has given us medicine and personal computers, right? Indeed, so onwards towards the great utopia! But is this so?  Why do the day-to-day lives of those of use in modernity seem like everything but the great utopia?  The previous millennia has seen a multitude of millenialist demagogues hellbent on establishing the “Great Society,” yet the he awakening public is becoming aware of the sense that modern utopia is really another form of enslavement, as even Zbigniew Brzezinski has noted on multiple occasions.

But what if the uprising of the masses is not really a good thing? Mass uprisings bring forth the reordering of society under a new hierarchy: not the elimination of hierarchy. Marshalling of the masses for political means has ever been the tool of petty tyrants, demagogues and gainsayers, as well as powerful larger interests. To understand the gigantic farce of the modern world’s beliefs about itself, it is to the ancient world that we must turn. This is a point you will almost never hear mentioned, so grab your pen and paper and get ready for notes. Following upon the French Revolution, most of the western world supposedly rejected monarchy and religion in favor of Enlightenment Republicanism. Obviously this doesn’t mean Sarah Palin and George Bush. By “republicanism” is meant the idea of a republic, and the idea of a republic cannot be divorced from Plato, and an analysis of the Republic should be given, but before that, the stream (or sewer) of millennial sects and movements must be explained.

Prior to the French Revolutionary Jacobins and so-called “illuminists,” came the medieval heretical sects of the Bogomils and Cathari that represented the most significant challenges to papal power. While never an organized front, the sectarians were able to wrest various sections of Europe from Roman primacy, while the compliment in the East could be seen as Islam, representing similarly a gnostic challenge to the Imperial Orthodoxy of Byzantium (such is the origin of Bogomilism, which birthed the western gnostic movements).

Also concurrent with these movements were the Catholic orders that had similar trends, like the Franciscans and pseduo-millennialists like Joachim of Fiore. The Joachimites and some Franciscans foresaw an era of mass pouring out of “the Spirit,” ushering in a “golden age” of humanity living righteously. In fact, Benedict XVI has even written concerning these connections in Joachim as follows:

“Ratzinger dug deep in his research. And he discovered that in Bonaventure, there is a strong connection with the vision of Joachim of Fiore, the Franciscan who had prophesied the imminent advent of a third age after those of the Father and the Son, an age of the Spirit, with a renewed and entirely “spiritual” Church, poor, reconciled with Greeks and Jews, in a world restored to peace.”

I think there is a clear conduit from this to modern revolutionary movements. The Thomas Muntzer rebellion should also be mentioned as important currents of modern socialism, inasmuch as Muntzer attempted to practice perfect and total communism. It is also important that these centers of rebellion were France, Germania and Hungary: future centers of radical communism and “illuminism.” Renaissance humanism and the Reformation gave birth to the revolutionary movements of Illuminism and socialism, yet there are two crucial factors seldom mentioned in treatments of this subject that undergird all these trends: Plato and millennialism. Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers